Judge permits Biden administration to continue reducing border wire fencing in Texas
U.S. Judge Rejects Texas Bid to Block Removal of Border Razor Wire Fencing
A U.S. judge on Thursday firmly denied Texas’ attempt to prevent federal immigration authorities from dismantling the razor wire fencing that the state had installed along the Mexico border to discourage illegal crossings.
U.S. District Judge Alia Moses, in Del Rio, Texas, criticized the Biden administration for its “utter failure” in preventing unlawful entry into the United States. However, she concluded that Texas was unlikely to succeed in its argument that the federal policy of removing the fencing was illegal.
Moses dismissed the state’s motion to halt the destruction of the wire fencing until the resolution of Texas’ lawsuit filed in October.
Last month, the judge had ordered the federal government to temporarily refrain from cutting or removing the razor wire while she considered Texas’ motion.
The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, expressed disappointment and announced that his office would appeal the decision. Paxton stated, “I am disappointed that the federal government’s blatant and disturbing efforts to subvert law and order at our State’s border with Mexico will be allowed to continue.”
The concertina wire fencing was initially installed on private property along the Rio Grande river by the Texas National Guard as part of Operation Lone Star, an initiative launched by Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott in 2021 to deter illegal border crossings.
Paxton’s lawsuit alleges that U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents have recently intensified their practice of cutting, destroying, or damaging the strategically placed wire with landowners’ permission.
Moses stated that Texas had not yet demonstrated, at this early stage of the case, that the federal government’s actions constituted a “final agency action” that could be challenged under a federal law governing agency rulemaking.
Separately, Texas is also defending its authority to install floating buoys in the middle of the Rio Grande to discourage migrants.
In September, a federal judge, at the request of the Biden administration, ordered the removal of the 1,000-foot (305-meter) barrier. However, an appeals court granted temporary permission for it to remain in place while Paxton’s office pursues an appeal.
(Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York, editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Bill Berkrot)
What are the arguments made by critics of Texas’ stance on the razor wire fencing, and why do they believe more comprehensive and humane approaches would be more effective in addressing the issue of illegal immigration
R 2021. The judge stated that the state of Texas did not provide sufficient evidence to show that the removal of the razor wire fencing would cause immediate and irreparable harm.
The razor wire fencing was initially installed by Texas in 2015 during the Obama administration as a deterrent to illegal immigration. The state argued that the fencing was effective in reducing unauthorized border crossings and that removing it would lead to a surge in illegal immigration.
However, Judge Moses highlighted that the decision to remove the razor wire fencing was within the purview of the federal government. She noted that immigration policy is primarily under the control of the executive branch, and Texas failed to establish that the federal policy was clearly unlawful.
This ruling comes amidst a larger debate over immigration policy in the United States. The Biden administration has taken steps to dismantle some of the restrictive immigration policies implemented by the previous administration. The removal of the razor wire fencing is seen as part of a broader effort to adopt a more humane and compassionate approach to immigration.
Despite the judge’s ruling, Texas vowed to continue fighting the federal government’s decision. The state attorney general’s office announced that it would appeal the decision, arguing that the Biden administration is neglecting its duty to secure the border.
Critics of Texas’ stance argue that the razor wire fencing is not only ineffective but also poses a danger to migrants, wildlife, and border communities. They contend that more comprehensive and humane approaches, such as improving border security technologies and investing in the legal immigration system, would be more effective in addressing the issue of illegal immigration.
The ruling by Judge Moses underscores the complex legal landscape surrounding immigration policy in the United States. As the state of Texas continues to challenge the federal government’s actions, it is clear that the debate over immigration will remain contentious and politically charged.
Ultimately, the resolution of this lawsuit and the fate of the razor wire fencing will have broader implications for immigration policy and the relationship between the federal government and individual states. It remains to be seen how this case will unfold and what impact it will have on the ongoing debate over immigration in the United States.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
