Conservative News Daily

Judge loses temper, slams table over Trump’s legal team, calls it ‘ridiculous’.

Judge Loses His Cool at⁣ Trump’s Legal Team, Pounds Table as He Exclaims ‘This Is Ridiculous’

The judge‍ presiding over the New York civil fraud case⁤ against Donald Trump was clearly irritated by the former president’s legal team during the‍ cross-examination of a crucial witness on Wednesday.

“This is ridiculous!”

Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron slammed his hand ​on the table and exclaimed those words ⁣as Trump’s lawyers delved into the details with‍ Mazars USA partner David Bender, accusing him of‍ evading their⁣ questions, according to the New York Post.

“Don’t waste ⁢time,”

the judge added, as the defense lawyers argued that they needed to meticulously examine their client’s records ‍”year by​ year” with the witness.

Trump’s legal team had already spent a significant amount‌ of time going through Bender’s ‌testimony, and when they announced that he would remain on the stand for the ⁢rest of the ‌day, that’s‍ when the judge lost his composure.

“This is ridiculous!”

he exclaimed.

“Mr. Bender isn’t on ‍trial here.”

“We ⁤need to be ​allowed​ to ‌analyze the evidence,” argued Trump attorney Christopher Kise. “We‌ didn’t⁣ bring ⁢this case.”

A second Trump lawyer, Alina Habba, claimed that‌ Bender⁢ had been ⁢uncooperative.

“We haven’t received a ⁢single answer‌ from him,” she stated. “He ⁣conveniently⁤ has ⁤no memory.”

Kise eventually agreed to streamline their questioning, to​ which the ‌judge responded ⁢by reiterating, “Let’s not waste time.”

Engoron⁣ suggested that Trump’s lawyers were engaging in courtroom theatrics aimed at ​impressing a jury or the‍ media, but were‌ not helpful in a⁣ bench trial that ⁣would be decided​ solely by the judge.

“There is no ‌jury here,” he‍ reminded the Trump team, later asking, “Who⁣ are you addressing ​— me, the press, or the ⁢audience?”

Trump’s Business Empire at Stake

Wednesday marked the third day of the trial in which the former​ president is accused of lying about his‍ total assets ‍to secure better deals on loans and insurance coverage, ⁤amounting to billions of dollars.

Although Trump is not required to‍ be present in the⁤ courtroom as he​ would in a​ criminal ⁢trial,⁤ he has attended ⁣the trial for the​ first three days, ⁢leaving ‌at lunchtime on Wednesday for Florida.

Trump has‌ repeatedly denounced ⁤the trial as fraud and an​ attempt‌ at political persecution to⁤ hinder‌ his potential candidacy in the 2024 presidential race.

“He already knows⁢ what⁢ he’s ​going to‌ do,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday, referring to ‍Engoron, as reported by Reuters.

Engoron has already ruled that Trump, along with his ​two adult​ sons,​ fraudulently inflated their net worth. ⁣Trump’s team filed‍ an appeal against that decision on Wednesday.

The⁣ ongoing proceedings⁣ primarily aim to determine ⁢the damages, which⁣ could potentially “dismantle Trump’s ​business empire,” according to ‍Reuters.

The post Judge ‍Loses⁢ His​ Cool at Trump’s Legal ​Team, ⁣Pounds ⁤Table as He Exclaims ‘This ‍Is ‍Ridiculous’ appeared ⁣first on The Western​ Journal.

​How can the judge’s‌ outburst impact the ⁣fairness and impartiality of the trial against Donald Trump?

Essing the judge and delaying the proceedings. He emphasized that the focus should be on presenting evidence and finding the‌ truth, rather than wasting time on unnecessary ⁣tactics.

The judge’s frustration highlights the contentious nature of the case against Donald Trump. The civil fraud trial, which​ accuses the former president of misleading investors in‌ a real estate project, is a high-stakes affair with significant implications for both Trump and the plaintiffs.

However, it is not uncommon for tensions to arise during legal proceedings, especially when dealing with complex‌ and⁢ high-profile cases. The judge’s outburst should not overshadow the ⁢importance of a fair and thorough examination of the evidence.

It is worth noting that judges are expected to maintain their composure and impartiality throughout the proceedings. The judge’s emotional reaction may raise questions about his ability to remain⁢ neutral and make ⁢fair judgments in‍ this case. However, it is important ⁤to remember that judges are human beings too, and the intense nature ​of ​the trial may have pushed him to his limit.

The incident serves as a ⁢reminder of the challenges faced by legal professionals in ⁢maintaining ​a calm and professional demeanor in the face of adversity. It also sheds‍ light on the pressure faced ​by judges in‍ high-stakes cases, where their decisions can have far-reaching consequences.

As the trial continues, it remains to be seen how the judge’s outburst will impact⁣ the proceedings. Will it lead to any changes in the way the case is conducted, ⁢or will it serve as a wake-up call for the​ legal teams involved? Only time will tell.

In the pursuit of justice, ⁢it is important for all parties involved to set aside their emotions‍ and ​focus on presenting a compelling case. The judge’s outburst should serve as a reminder of the importance of maintaining professionalism⁣ and‌ respect in the‍ courtroom. Only by adhering to these principles can we ensure a fair and impartial ⁢legal system.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker