Judge denies Trump’s delay request due to mother-in-law’s death

Donald Trump’s​ Mother-in-Law’s Death Fails to Delay Trial

A civil business fraud trial in New York involving former President Donald Trump will ⁢proceed as scheduled, despite‍ the recent passing of ‍his mother-in-law. The judge firmly rejected Trump’s attorney’s request to postpone closing arguments due to this personal tragedy.

In an email exchange,⁢ attorney Chris Kise brought up the matter while discussing ⁣Trump’s desire to deliver ‍his own closing argument. Kise informed the court of the sad⁣ news regarding the death of Melania Trump’s mother, ⁤Amalija Knavs, and ⁣requested a delay until January 29, 2024, to⁤ allow Trump to attend the proceedings.

However, Judge Arthur Engoron, presiding⁢ over the case brought by New York⁢ Attorney ‍General Letitia James, expressed his condolences but firmly⁢ denied the request for a postponement. Engoron emphasized the logistical challenges ​involved in ⁢rearranging schedules and resources for Trump’s appearance, ‍including the need to relocate another ongoing trial.

Despite the judge’s decision, Kise confirmed that Trump would‌ still be speaking the following day, disregarding Engoron’s demands for certain limitations ‍on his speech. Trump’s attorneys failed to meet the extended deadline for responding to these conditions, indicating their non-compliance.

Engoron, disappointed by the ⁣lack of cooperation,‍ stated that he assumed Trump would not agree to the imposed limits and,⁢ therefore, ⁣would not be delivering a ‌closing⁣ statement in court.

How did Judge Engoron respond ⁢to the​ request to postpone closing arguments in Donald Trump’s civil business fraud trial?

Donald Trump’s Mother-in-Law’s Death Fails to Delay ‌Trial

A⁤ civil business fraud trial involving‌ former President Donald Trump in New York will proceed as scheduled,‌ despite the recent passing ⁢of ​his mother-in-law. The judge firmly rejected Trump’s ‍attorney’s request to postpone closing arguments due to this personal‍ tragedy.

In an email‌ exchange, attorney Chris Kise brought ‌up the matter while discussing Trump’s desire to deliver his own closing argument. ⁤Kise informed the court ​of the sad news regarding the death of Melania Trump’s mother, Amalija Knavs, and requested a delay until January 29, 2024,‌ to allow Trump to ⁣attend the proceedings.

However, ​Judge Arthur Engoron, ​presiding over the case ‍brought by‌ New York Attorney General Letitia James, expressed his condolences but firmly​ denied the request for a postponement. Engoron emphasized ‍the logistical challenges involved in rearranging schedules and resources⁤ for Trump’s appearance, including the need to ​relocate another​ ongoing trial.

Despite the judge’s decision, Kise confirmed that Trump would still be speaking the following day, disregarding Engoron’s ‍demands for certain limitations on his speech. Trump’s attorneys failed to meet the extended deadline for responding to these​ conditions,⁤ indicating their non-compliance.

Engoron, disappointed by the lack of cooperation, stated that he assumed Trump would not‍ agree to the imposed‍ limits and, therefore, would not be delivering a closing statement in court.

This case has garnered significant⁢ attention due to Donald Trump’s involvement and his previous presidency. The trial revolves around allegations of​ civil business fraud, with the New York Attorney⁤ General’s‌ office leading the charge in investigating and prosecuting alleged misconduct.

While⁣ the passing of Melania Trump’s‍ mother is undoubtedly ⁤a personal tragedy‍ for the Trump family, the ‍court’s decision to ⁤continue with the trial as scheduled ⁣highlights the importance⁤ of adhering to legal procedures and ensuring a fair and just process. ⁤Judge Engoron’s emphasis on the practical challenges of rearranging schedules and resources ⁢further reinforces the ⁢court’s commitment to efficiency and timely resolution of cases.

The decision of ​Donald Trump’s attorneys to proceed‍ with Trump’s closing​ statement, despite the limitations imposed by the court, suggests⁢ a disregard for the court’s authority and its ⁢rules. This non-compliance can have serious ramifications and may impact the overall perception of the trial.

As the ‌trial continues, it remains to be seen⁣ how the judge’s⁢ denial of the postponement ‍request‍ and his subsequent assumption about Trump’s closing‌ statement will shape the outcome of the case. With Trump’s continued involvement, the spotlight remains on this ​trial, ‌adding ​to the already intense political landscape surrounding him.

In conclusion, despite the recent passing of ‍Melania Trump’s mother,⁢ the civil business ​fraud trial involving Donald Trump will proceed as scheduled.⁤ Judge Engoron rejected ⁤the request⁣ for a postponement, citing logistical challenges, and Trump’s attorneys ‍failed to⁣ comply with limitations ‍imposed on Trump’s closing statement. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to legal procedures and the ⁤consequences of non-compliance in a fair and just process. The trial’s outcome will continue to attract widespread attention⁢ due to Donald ‌Trump’s involvement and the political context surrounding him.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases