Election results nullified due to illegal votes found
Judge Orders New Election After Illegal Votes Discovered
In a dramatic turn of events, the presiding judge in the Caddo Parish sheriff election has called for a new election due to the incredibly close margin of victory. The race, which saw Democratic candidate Henry Whitehorn defeat Republican opponent John Nickelson by just one vote, has been marred by allegations of fraudulent voting and a flawed electoral process.
After a recount that added three votes to each candidate’s tally, Nickelson immediately challenged the results in a lawsuit. The case was eventually handed to retired justice E. Joseph Bleich, who ruled in Nickelson’s favor. Bleich declared the election results void and ordered another runoff election, citing the presence of at least 11 illegal votes that were cast and counted.
The ruling has sparked anger from Whitehorn’s camp, who argue that Nickelson failed to provide sufficient evidence of fraud. Whitehorn’s supporters believe that the judiciary should not have the power to decide elections and that the results should only be disturbed under extraordinary circumstances with compelling evidence.
The ruling has caught the attention of Republican activist Scott Presler, who sees it as an example of voter fraud influencing local elections. This case is likely to resonate with conservatives who still harbor concerns about the integrity of past elections.
According to a recent survey by Rasmussen Reports, a majority of likely voters believe that cheating in the 2024 election cycle is likely, further fueling the debate around election integrity.
Source: The Western Journal
What were the grounds on which the judge called for a new election in the Caddo Parish sheriff race?
Title: Judge Orders New Election After Illegal Votes Discovered
Introduction
In a surprising turn of events, a judge presiding over the Caddo Parish sheriff election has called for a new election due to the incredibly narrow margin of victory. The result, which saw Democratic candidate Henry Whitehorn defeating Republican opponent John Nickelson by just one vote, has been tainted by allegations of fraudulent voting and a flawed electoral process.
Legal Proceedings and Ruling
Following a recount that added three votes to both candidates’ tallies, Nickelson promptly contested the results through a lawsuit. The case was eventually assigned to retired justice E. Joseph Bleich, who declared in favor of Nickelson. Bleich deemed the election results null and void, ordering a runoff election due to the presence of at least 11 illegal votes that had been cast and counted.
Controversy and Opposition
The ruling has stirred up anger within Whitehorn’s camp, as they argue that Nickelson failed to provide sufficient evidence of fraud. Supporters of Whitehorn believe that the power to decide elections should not rest with the judiciary and that election results should only be disturbed under extraordinary circumstances accompanied by compelling evidence.
The Case’s Implications
The ruling has captured the attention of Republican activist Scott Presler, who views it as an example of voter fraud influencing local elections. This case is likely to resonate with conservatives who still harbor concerns regarding the integrity of past elections.
Furthermore, recent surveys conducted by Rasmussen Reports indicate that a majority of likely voters believe that cheating in the 2024 election cycle is likely. This fuels the ongoing debate surrounding the issue of election integrity.
Conclusion
The decision by the presiding judge to order a new election in the Caddo Parish sheriff race has brought to light the critical issue of fraudulent voting and its potential impact on the democratic process. The controversy surrounding this case highlights the need for comprehensive measures to ensure the integrity of future elections. As the nation continues to grapple with concerns surrounding election fraud, it is crucial for lawmakers and election officials to address these issues to restore public trust in our democratic system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...