Judge: Lady Gaga Not Obligated to Pay $500K Reward in Dognapping Case
Judge Rules Lady Gaga Won’t Pay Reward for Stolen Dogs
A judge has made a ruling that Lady Gaga will not be required to pay the promised $500,000 reward for the safe return of her stolen dogs.
The 37-year-old recording artist, known as Stefani Germanotta, successfully had Jennifer McBride’s request for the reward money thrown out. McBride had filed a lawsuit against Gaga, demanding the reward and additional damages.
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Holly J. Fujie stated that McBride’s complaint was legally insufficient due to her involvement in the theft. McBride had been indicted and pleaded no contest to charges of receiving stolen property, making her ineligible to benefit from her wrongdoing by seeking to enforce the contract.
The incident occurred in February 2021 when James Howard Jackson and two others were driving around Hollywood looking for French bulldogs. They encountered Gaga’s dog walker, Ryan Fisher, who was assaulted and shot before the dogs were taken. Jackson pleaded no contest to attempted murder and was sentenced to 21 years in prison.
Fisher, who called the violence a “very close call with death,” underwent surgery to have part of his lung removed. Gaga promised to cover all his medical expenses and provide counseling for him.
McBride returned the stolen dogs several days later, claiming she was not involved in the theft and only took possession of the animals to return them to Gaga. However, it was later discovered that she was in a romantic relationship with Harold White, the father of Jackson’s accomplice.
McBride received two years probation after pleading no contest to one count of receiving stolen property.
What was the basis of Judge Fujie’s decision to dismiss Jennifer McBride’s request for the reward money?
Title: Judge Rules Lady Gaga Will Not Pay Reward for Stolen Dogs
Introduction
In a recent ruling, a judge has determined that Lady Gaga, the renowned recording artist, is not obligated to pay the promised $500,000 reward for the safe return of her stolen dogs. The decision came as a result of Jennifer McBride’s lawsuit against Gaga, in which she demanded the reward money and additional damages. This article delves into the court’s ruling, the circumstances surrounding the incident, and the legal implications.
McBride’s Request Dismissed
Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Holly J. Fujie ruled in favor of Lady Gaga, dismissing Jennifer McBride’s request for the reward money. Judge Fujie deemed McBride’s complaint legally insufficient due to her involvement in the theft. It is important to note that McBride had been indicted and pleaded no contest to charges of receiving stolen property, rendering her ineligible to benefit from her wrongdoing by seeking to enforce the contract.
The February 2021 Incident
The incident in question took place in February 2021 when James Howard Jackson and two others were cruising around Hollywood in search of French bulldogs. They encountered Gaga’s dog walker, Ryan Fisher, who was eventually assaulted and shot, resulting in the theft of the dogs. James Howard Jackson pleaded no contest to attempted murder and was subsequently sentenced to 21 years in prison.
Fisher’s Near-death Experience
Ryan Fisher, the victim of the attack, described the violence as a “very close call with death.” He underwent surgery to have part of his lung removed as a result. In response to his harrowing experience, Lady Gaga promised to cover all of Fisher’s medical expenses and provide counseling for him, showing her gratitude and concern for his well-being.
McBride’s Role and Return of the Dogs
Jennifer McBride claims that she was not involved in the theft and merely took possession of the stolen dogs to return them to Lady Gaga. However, it was later discovered that she was involved in a romantic relationship with Harold White, the father of Jackson’s accomplice. This connection raised suspicions about McBride’s true motivations and her alleged innocence in the case.
Legal Consequences
Following her involvement, Jennifer McBride received two years of probation after pleading no contest to one count of receiving stolen property. This conviction, in conjunction with her intimate link to the crime, further strengthened the court’s decision to dismiss her claim for the reward money.
Conclusion
In the case of Lady Gaga’s stolen dogs, the recent ruling by Judge Holly J. Fujie highlights the importance of legal accountability and the limitations placed on individuals involved in criminal activities. Jennifer McBride’s lawsuit seeking the promised reward money has been thrown out due to her direct connection to the theft. As Lady Gaga continues to support her dog walker’s recovery and address the aftermath of the incident, this case serves as a reminder of the complexities involved in tackling stolen property and seeking justice for all parties involved.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...