Judge dismisses Green Bay’s ‘retaliatory’ disorderly conduct charge against election observer
Janet Angus bravely fought for election integrity, but the city of Green Bay didn’t take it lightly. The heavy-handed tactics from a leftist-led “Zuckbucks” city that spied on its own citizens didn’t come as a surprise to those familiar with Green Bay politics. However, the fact that city leaders were called out in court adds a new twist to the ongoing saga of local government corruption.
In a significant ruling, Brown County Circuit Court Judge Tammy Jo Hock dismissed a disorderly conduct conviction against Janet Angus, a respected businesswoman, attorney, and election integrity activist. The judge determined that the city failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the conviction and suggested that the citation was a retaliatory response to a complaint filed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission.
This ruling exposes the corrupt practices of Green Bay’s city government, led by far-left Mayor Eric Genrich, and highlights the attempts to silence conservative election observers. It serves as a reminder that while the left claims to protect election workers, they are the ones suppressing dissenting voices in cities like Green Bay.
The Keys to Green Bay’s Elections
Janet Angus has been a vigilant observer of Green Bay’s elections, particularly during the controversial 2020 presidential election cycle. Green Bay was one of the major recipients of “Zuckbucks” grants, which raised concerns about the integrity of the election process. The involvement of liberal activists and the suspicious relationships between the Center for Tech and Civic Life and local elections officials in cities like Green Bay further fueled doubts about the fairness of the elections.
Furthermore, the actions of Celestine Jeffreys, the City Clerk of Green Bay, have raised eyebrows. Jeffreys has had a tense relationship with election observers and has been accused of denying them proper access to the voting process. Her disregard for election laws was evident when she allowed a voter to return her husband’s ballot, despite the requirement that voters must return their own ballots unless they have a disability preventing them from doing so.
Shopping a Conviction
It is clear that the city of Green Bay targeted Janet Angus after the complaint was filed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission. The local district attorney declined to pursue a criminal case due to lack of evidence, but Assistant City Attorney Rachel Maes was determined to secure a conviction. However, the court found that Angus’ behavior did not warrant a disorderly conduct charge.
‘It’s Tyranny’
Janet Angus’s victory in court is a significant blow to the city of Green Bay and its attempts to suppress election integrity activists. Critics argue that Mayor Genrich and his allies have made life difficult for Angus and others who dare to challenge the status quo. The installation of surveillance cameras without public consent and the alleged spying on political opponents only further highlight the city’s tyrannical behavior. The Wisconsin Voter Alliance, along with Angus, is considering a counter suit against the city to hold them accountable.
rnrn
What tactics did the city government in Green Bay employ to silence conservative election observers and suppress dissenting voices?
S allocation of funds in Democrat strongholds like Green Bay raised questions about potential bias and manipulation in the election.
As an election integrity activist, Janet Angus took it upon herself to monitor and scrutinize the election process in Green Bay. She recognized the importance of upholding the integrity of elections, ensuring that every vote counted and that the process was transparent and free from interference.
However, her efforts were met with resistance from the city government, led by far-left Mayor Eric Genrich. The tactics employed by the city included spying on its own citizens and attempting to silence conservative election observers like Angus.
In a significant ruling, Judge Tammy Jo Hock of Brown County Circuit Court dismissed a disorderly conduct conviction against Janet Angus. The judge found that the city failed to provide sufficient evidence to support the conviction and suggested that it was a retaliatory response to Angus’s complaint filed with the Wisconsin Elections Commission.
This ruling sheds light on the corrupt practices within Green Bay’s city government. It exposes the attempts to suppress dissenting voices and silence conservative election observers. The involvement of Mayor Eric Genrich and his far-left leadership further highlights the partisan nature of these actions.
It is crucial to recognize that while the left often claims to protect election workers, they are, in fact, the ones suppressing dissenting voices and hindering election integrity efforts. In cities like Green Bay, the conservative viewpoint is often marginalized and silenced, leading to a lack of transparency and accountability.
The controversy surrounding the distribution of “Zuckbucks” grants adds another layer to the ongoing saga of local government corruption in Green Bay. The suspicious allocation of funds in Democrat strongholds raises concerns about potential bias and manipulation in the election process. The presence of liberal activists further complicates the issue and raises questions about their motives and intentions.
Janet Angus’s role as a vigilant observer of Green Bay’s elections highlights the importance of citizen engagement in ensuring the integrity of the democratic process. Her determination to hold the government accountable serves as an inspiration to others who value transparency and fairness in elections.
Moving forward, it is imperative for citizens to continue advocating for election integrity and fighting against corruption. Only by actively participating and monitoring the electoral process can we ensure that every vote counts and that the foundational principles of democracy are upheld. The Green Bay case serves as a reminder of the ongoing challenges and the importance of remaining vigilant in the face of corruption.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...