Judge denies motion to suppress evidence in Delphi murder suspect’s home search despite claims of improper acquisition

Judge Refuses to Throw Out Evidence in​ Delphi Murder Case

The​ judge presiding over the trial of a man accused of ⁣killing‌ two teenagers in Delphi, Indiana, has denied a motion to exclude ‍evidence obtained from a search of the suspect’s home.

Attorneys for Richard Allen, ⁤51, argued that the search warrant used by the police was‌ based on misleading information and ‌failed to establish a connection between the⁣ evidence sought⁣ and the crime. However, Judge Fran Gull, who Allen’s lawyers attempted to have removed from the case, ruled that⁣ the evidence collected from the​ search would be admissible.

Allen’s recently reinstated attorneys, Andrew Baldwin and Bradley ‌Rozzi, claimed that the ⁣search‌ was illegal. Nevertheless, Judge Gull determined that the probable cause affidavit contained‌ sufficient information to justify the⁣ search and that it did ⁤not contain ⁤false statements or omissions.

“The court finds that the ‌affidavit for the search warrant was valid, making the search itself legal under Indiana law and Fourth Amendment ‍case law,” stated Judge Gull in her ruling.

Prosecutors have highlighted an unfired bullet found at the crime scene as a key ‍piece​ of evidence linking Allen to the murders of Abby Williams⁤ and Libby German. They assert that this bullet matches a Sig Sauer Model P226 discovered during⁢ the search of Allen’s home.

However, Stephen Gutowski,‌ a certified firearms instructor and reporter, cautions against accepting this ‍claim at face value.

“The forensic techniques ‌used‌ to match ‌specific guns to specific bullets have faced significant scrutiny‍ in recent years,” Gutowski explained. “Therefore, it is important to approach claims like this with skepticism. The idea that‌ a mark on a casing can be definitively linked to a specific gun’s extractor seems doubtful to me.”

Gutowski further noted that while it is possible for an extractor on a particular model of gun to leave a unique ‍marking on an unspent round, the Sig Sauer P226 is a widely popular firearm, making it unlikely that‍ the extractors on each pistol​ would leave⁢ a distinguishable mark.

CLICK HERE TO⁢ GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

How does the inclusion of the evidence obtained from Allen’s home impact the Delphi murder case

The search warrant was valid and the evidence gathered could be admitted in court.

The case involves the⁣ brutal ⁤murders of 14-year-old Liberty ⁣German and 13-year-old Abigail Williams, who‍ were found dead near a hiking trail in Delphi in February 2017. The tragic incident shocked the ⁣small town and gained national attention. Despite intense public interest and widespread coverage, the‌ case remained unsolved for more than ‌two years.

In April 2019, Richard Allen was arrested and charged with the murder of the two ‌girls. During ⁢the investigation, police⁤ obtained a search warrant for Allen’s home, where they claimed to find evidence linking him to the crime. However, the defense ⁢team argued that the search warrant was flawed and the evidence⁣ gathered should be deemed inadmissible.

In court, Allen’s attorneys contended‌ that the information used to obtain the search warrant was misleading and did not establish a connection between Allen ‌and the crime. They argued that the warrant was essentially a fishing expedition, lacking probable⁢ cause and violating⁤ their client’s Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.

The ‍defense further ​claimed that the police failed to demonstrate ​a sufficient​ nexus between the evidence sought and the crime committed. According to them, the evidence found in Allen’s home, such as cellphones, computers, and clothing, could not definitively prove his⁤ involvement in the‍ murders.

Despite the vigorous arguments put forth by Allen’s lawyers, ⁣Judge Fran Gull ruled against the defense motion to exclude the evidence. In her decision, Judge Gull stated⁣ that the search ​warrant was‍ properly obtained and based on sufficient probable cause. She concluded that the evidence seized during the search⁤ was relevant to the investigation and⁣ could be presented to the jury.

This ruling is a significant development in⁣ the Delphi murder case, as the evidence obtained from Allen’s home could play a crucial role in proving his guilt or innocence. The inclusion of this evidence in the ⁣trial ensures that all relevant information is ⁣considered ⁢by the ​jury, allowing for a fair and ‌thorough⁤ assessment of the case.

The trial proceedings​ will continue, with the evidence obtained⁣ from Allen’s home now admissible ​in court. The decision by Judge Gull highlights the importance of following⁢ proper legal procedures​ and ensuring⁢ that ‍search warrants‍ are ⁢obtained based⁢ on sufficient probable cause.

As the Delphi murder case continues to unfold, the search for justice for Liberty German and Abigail Williams remains⁤ a top priority. The denial of the defense motion to exclude evidence from the trial brings hope to the families ⁢of the victims and the community of Delphi.

It is ⁤important to remember that the accused, Richard Allen, is innocent until proven guilty. ⁢The trial will offer an opportunity for both the⁢ defense and the prosecution to present their case and for ​the jury to make ⁣an impartial decision based on the evidence presented.

Regardless of the trial’s outcome, the tragedy of the Delphi murders has had a lasting impact on the ​community and serves as⁤ a ​reminder of the​ need for justice, both for the ⁢victims and their families and for the broader society.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases