Judicial Watch deems Trump’s gag order as illegal and irrational.
OAN’s Daniel Baldwin
9:07 AM – Tuesday, October 31, 2023
A Washington, D.C. federal judge has reinstated a gag order on former President Donald Trump, leaving legal experts puzzled.
“The idea that President Trump will face intense scrutiny and criminal enforcement while running a presidential campaign is mind-boggling,” said Chris Farrell, director of investigations at Judicial Watch, in an interview with One America News. “It’s not only unlawful, but illogical.”
After temporarily lifting the gag order at the request of the Trump legal team, Judge Tanya Chutkan reinstated it, arguing that “the right to a fair trial is not [Trump’s] alone, but also belongs to the government and the public.”
Farrell emphasized that despite Trump’s financial resources, he is at a disadvantage as the government has unlimited power and resources.
“When the government decides to criminally prosecute someone, as they are doing now with the case titled ‘United States of America vs. Donald Trump,’ it’s a tremendous weight and power brought against an individual,” Farrell explained. “The entire United States of America, the Justice Department, unlimited resources, lawyers, investigators, and control over the legal process are being used against one person.”
Farrell argues that Chutkan’s reasoning regarding the government’s right to a fair trial goes against the United States Constitution.
“The opening line of the Constitution is ‘we the people,’ not ’us the government,'” Farrell stated. “The government doesn’t have superior rights over individual citizens in a case like this. The fair trial guarantee is for the individual person.”
Chutkan claimed that a Truth Social post made by Trump would have violated the gag order. Trump had responded to a news report by criticizing those who would take a deal, which Chutkan argued would “almost certainly violate the Order under any reasonable definition of targeting.”
Farrell questions the ban on Trump’s statements, asking what kind of magical powers Chutkan imagines he possesses.
“Just because he speaks out, expresses frustration, or disagrees with something, what kind of magical secret powers does Judge Chutkan think Trump has?” Farrell questioned. “It’s unfair to silence him.”
Farrell believes that the gag order will allow Trump’s opponents to control the narrative and leak damaging stories about him.
“Smith and his staff are like a sieve,” Farrell explained. “They provide information to these so-called journalists who simply take down dictation and print it. It’s like state-run media, reminiscent of the old days of the Soviet Union.”
“Judge Chutkan is a government attorney who wears a black robe,” Farrell continued. “She draws her paycheck from the United States Treasury, just like Jack Smith does. The only difference is she wears a black robe. That’s the unpleasant truth.”
Stay informed! Subscribe to receive breaking news directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here.
It’s a busy week for Trump as a Colorado case could potentially remove him from the ballot through the 14th Amendment, while Judge Chutkan revives his gag order.
On this day in 1967, the voice of Tennessee icon Dolly Parton was heard by Americans, propelling the country music singer from obscurity to global acclaim.
A federal judge has re-imposed a gag order on the 45th President Donald Trump, ending a temporary suspension.
Following a mass shooting that left 18 people dead and 13 injured, the residents of Lewiston, Maine gather for a Halloween event.
China’s most popular social media platforms have announced new regulations requiring “self-media” accounts with over 500,000 followers to display real-name information.
Intel’s stock rose over 9% on Friday, signaling a rebound in the personal computer market after a prolonged slump.
Amazon.com saw a 7% increase in its stock on Friday as it competes with Microsoft for a larger share of the booming artificial intelligence market.
Malaysia’s communications regulator will issue a warning to social media firms TikTok and Meta for allegedly blocking pro-Palestinian content on their platforms.
rnrn
What are the concerns about the gag order enabling Trump’s opponents to control the narrative and selectively leak damaging stories, and how does this relate to the principles of transparency and fairness in a legal case
Title: Former President Trump Faces Reinstated Gag Order: A Legal Conundrum
Introduction:
In a surprising turn of events, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. has reinstated a gag order on former President Donald Trump. Legal experts are left puzzled by this decision, questioning its legality and logic. This article explores the implications of the gag order and the arguments put forth by both sides.
The Gag Order:
The recent reinstatement of the gag order on Donald Trump has sparked controversy and confusion among legal experts. While Judge Tanya Chutkan temporarily lifted the order at the request of Trump’s legal team, she later reversed her decision. In doing so, she argued that the right to a fair trial extends not only to Trump but also to the government and the public.
The Uneven Playing Field:
One key argument against the gag order is the perceived imbalance of power. Chris Farrell, director of investigations at Judicial Watch, highlighted that Trump, despite his financial resources, is at a significant disadvantage against a government with unlimited power and resources. Farrell emphasized that the government’s immense weight and power are being used against one individual, which goes against the principles enshrined in the United States Constitution.
Rights of the Individual vs. the Government:
Farrell further challenges Chutkan’s reasoning, emphasizing that the opening line of the Constitution is “we the people” and not “us the government.” He argues that the government does not have superior rights over individual citizens in a case like this. The fair trial guarantee is intended for the protection of the individual person, not the government’s interests.
The Ban on Trump’s Statements:
Chutkan claimed that a social media post made by Trump could have violated the gag order. In response, Trump had criticized those who would take a deal in reference to a news report. Farrell questions the basis for such a ban, highlighting that it stifles Trump’s right to express frustration and disagreement. He further asks what “magical powers” Chutkan believes Trump possesses that would warrant silencing him.
Controlling the Narrative:
Farrell raises concerns about the gag order enabling Trump’s opponents to control the narrative and leak damaging stories about him. He asserts that information from the government’s side tends to be selectively shared with journalists who merely serve as conduits for the narrative. This state of affairs is likened to state-run media, reminiscent of the old days of the Soviet Union.
Conclusion:
The reinstatement of the gag order on former President Donald Trump has sparked considerable debate within the legal community. Legal experts question the legality and logic behind the decision, highlighting concerns about the imbalance of power and violations of constitutional rights. As this case continues to unfold, it remains crucial to uphold the principles of transparency, fairness, and the protection of individual rights.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...