A memo from the Justice Project, exclusively given to the Washington Examiner, argues the GOP candidate’s legal challenge is based on a “hope that extreme partisanship in state courts will eliminate votes” that were already certified in various other contests, including wins by President Donald Trump and Gov. Josh Stein (D-NC).

“Griffin’s case looks even worse after his filing this week, which exposed missed deadlines and demonstrable errors in his legal team’s submissions,” Andrew Bates, former Biden White House senior deputy press secretary and adviser to the Justice Project, said in the memo.

“He is now demanding an egregious double standard: that North Carolina overturn an election multiple recounts affirm he lost by retroactively changing existing law in order to reject legally-cast military ballots — based on his sloppy, improperly-filed legal briefs,” Bates added.

The Justice Project describes itself as a “nonpartisan organization dedicated to upholding the rule of law and the independence of American courts.” The memo is being sent to veterans and legal organizations and “center-right individuals and groups,” the Washington Examiner learned.

Griffin’s arguments have centered on the legality of the registration of the 60,000 voters, saying they did not provide photo identification, in violation of state law, or did not have a driver’s license or Social Security number on file. In his latest state court filing, Griffin argued the state elections board defied last week’s state Supreme Court ruling, and he called for further orders tossing out “never resident” votes.

The memo accuses Griffin’s campaign of targeting military and overseas ballots in predominantly Democratic counties, pointing to a ProPublica report showing Griffin previously voted using the method.

“Imagine the Republican reaction if, after losing an election and two recounts, a Democratic candidate sued to throw out military ballots in 4 Republican-leaning counties on the grounds that those voters followed federal law,” the memo says.

Bates also pointed to various Republican officials who have called on Griffin to give up his legal fight and concede the election to Riggs. Some of the GOP officials he lists include former Gov. Pat McCrory (R-NC) and state Supreme Court Justice Richard Dietz.

Dietz’s opinion from last week, in which he called for a “decisive rejection of this sort of post hoc judicial tampering in election results,” is referred to in the memo.

He also compared Griffin’s tactics to those used by Trump during his unsuccessful election challenges following his 2020 election loss.

“Not only is Griffin’s legal strategy copied from the campaign whose election denial led to an unprecedented violent assault on the Capitol, it’s also running into a similar problem: the facts,” Bates said.

The memo concludes by citing reports that cast doubt on several of Griffin’s claims of illegal or ineligible voters. It also concludes that the most recent recount tally showing the Republican losing to the incumbent proves voters were “right about this sore loser.”

“Taken together, the loser of last year’s N.C. Supreme Court race thinks taking power is more important than the sacred right of servicemen and women to participate in elections — and that manufactured technicalities are enough to disenfranchise those Americans, but that the actual rules should not apply to him,” it says.

NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT PAUSES VOTER ELIGIBILITY REVIEW IN TIGHT CONTEST

“Revealingly, this may be the only time in American history that a judicial candidate is whining in court about voters not breaking the law. That double standard, and the incompetence with which it has been demonstrated, proves that North Carolina was right about this sore loser,” the memo concludes.

The balance of the high court is not at risk of changing with this election, but Republicans could further solidify their majority if Griffin wins the contest. The high court, not counting Riggs’s seat, has a 5-1 Republican majority. A Riggs victory would keep the court at a 5-2 GOP advantage, while a Griffin victory would increase the Republican advantage to 6-1.