The Western Journal

Kamala Harris Campaign Panics, Drops Meltdown Message as Trump-Musk Interview Could Turn Tables on Her

The excerpt discusses Vice President Kamala Harris’s recent media ⁣attention,‌ suggesting she‍ has become​ a favored figure among‌ journalists despite her ‍lack of direct engagement in primary debates. The ‌writing highlights a contrast between her and other ⁣political⁣ figures, particularly Elon Musk and Donald ‍Trump, whose recent interaction attracted significant viewership.

Harris’s campaign responded to Musk’s actions, criticizing‌ him for ⁤providing a platform to Trump and arguing that he is spreading a “hateful agenda.” ⁣This ⁣response, described‍ as “unhinged,” reflects a sense of desperation within Harris’s camp to combat criticism and maintain a favorable image without directly addressing Trump ​or Musk publicly.

The text poses questions about ​Harris’s reluctance to engage ⁤in ⁤tough interviews, suggesting that she prefers‌ adulation over substantive debate. It critiques the campaign’s approach as ⁢lacking enough confidence to confront political adversaries head-on, raising ‌concerns over her qualifications⁤ for⁣ a presidential bid.

The piece concludes by calling into question whether this approach is appropriate for someone⁢ aspiring to⁢ the presidency, ​insinuating that ​genuine political discourse is necessary for⁢ successful​ leadership.


You would think that Vice President Kamala Harris isn’t wanting for attention right now.

To the surprise of many, she’s become the media’s darling since taking over the role as designated Democrat standard-bearer from President Joe Biden, despite the fact she didn’t run in a single primary or hasn’t answered a single question from them.

If you thought the cold shoulder would attract media criticism, you obviously don’t know our media. Uncomfortable with even broaching the issue of Joe Biden’s age, they now can breathe a sigh of relief at not having to ask anything of the woman who usurped him, showering her with all kinds of adulation.

However, the spotlight wasn’t on her or her campaign on Monday, but rather on Elon Musk and Donald Trump, the GOP nominee. Over 1.3 million listeners tuned in to the conversation, according to Reuters — which, in typical Reuters-ish fashion, called the affair “rambling.” (Conversations that take place over three hours do happen to touch on a wide range of subjects, in case you’ve never had one, but I digress.)

This was one day, however. Surely Harris could deal with one day of being out of the spotlight without going nuts, right?

Well, if that were the case, we wouldn’t be here talking about it. In an unhinged campaign sent out before the event, Harris’ people inveighed against Musk for hosting the event and called Trump “unhinged.” A bit of projection there, as you’ll quickly see.

“Right now, Elon Musk is interviewing Donald Trump live on Twitter (we’re not calling it ‘X’),” the began.

“It’s not enough that Musk has pledged to donate millions of dollars to help reelect Trump,” it continued.

“He’s using his purchased platform — one of the largest social media sites in the world — to spread Trump’s unhinged and hateful agenda to millions of users.”

“If that’s all you need to hear, chip in $25 now to help Kamala and Tim have the resources to respond to their lies.”

But, wait: Weren’t tech titans supposed to be able to moderate their walled gardens how they liked? That’s the line we heard when was cracking down on free speech. That’s the line we heard when Twitter — now X, we’re calling it that — was in different hands and taking a more censorious approach to information. And don’t Harris and running mate Tim Walz have plenty of tech titans in their corner to make sure they have the resources at hand to “respond to their lies” with lies of their own?

Well, yes. But those were and are all good things because those were liberal tech titans who were doing those sorts of things. Elon Musk lets people have freedom of speech on X, and we can’t have that.

“Musk has already ruined Twitter by allowing hate speech and disinformation to flood the platform,” the added. “Now, Musk is using his vast fortune and broad reach to try and control our democracy.”

Not that they provide any statistics to back this up. I forget: Do assertions like this count as disinformation, misinformation or malinformation? Enquiring minds want to know.

We’d hate to increase the “broad reach” of this “unhinged and hateful agenda” here. So, whatever you do, don’t click on this post, because it’s a recording of the conversation. Don’t give them air, people! Whatever you do!

Of course, there’s one problem with this: If Harris wants an evening on her own with Musk, she’s perfectly welcome to it. But don’t just take my word for it:

And while Musk may have a dog in this fight, it’s hardly like Harris giving an interview to Tucker Carlson.

Musk has an open mind and is, above all else, a consummate showman when it comes to social media. It’d be as fair an interview as Kamala could hope for from a slightly adversarial force. But she doesn’t want it. She doesn’t want an interview, period. She just wants praise and an easy time of it. And if she doesn’t get it, she’s going to stomp her feet until everyone else plays along, because she seems terrified of the alternative: actually having to win this election on the issues, not on positive press.

Is this a skill set that we want in our next president? Because that’s what she brings to the table, in case the didn’t clue you in.






" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker