LA Fire Department’s DEI Obsession Comes to Light as Devastating Wildfire Rages

The text discusses the controversy surrounding‌ the ⁣Los ​Angeles ⁢Fire Department’s (LAFD) “racial ​equity plan” and its implications for fire⁤ safety ⁢and hiring practices. ⁣According to a conservative viewpoint articulated in the article,⁢ the plan emphasizes diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) ⁤at​ the expense of merit and ⁢competence, suggesting that it reflects⁣ a broader‌ trend on the political left towards undermining meritocracy.Prominent conservative figures, including ‌the ⁤actor james‍ Woods, express⁢ frustration that efforts to promote diversity have led to neglect ⁣of crucial priorities like firefighting capabilities, particularly amid recent wildfires in California.

The article highlights criticism of Fire Chief⁣ Kristin M. Crowley, ⁤noting that her bio prioritizes ⁤diversity initiatives over fire safety​ concerns. It also shares ​anecdotes, such as that of⁤ comedian Adam Carolla, who recounts⁤ being denied a⁣ chance to apply for a firefighter position due⁣ to race and ‌gender quotas. ​The text ​argues that by prioritizing identity over qualifications, the LAFD⁣ and similar⁤ organizations risk compromising⁤ their effectiveness, ultimately leading to‍ detrimental outcomes in⁢ emergency situations. ​The⁢ overarching message ⁤critiques⁤ the current DEI-focused policies as‍ perhaps⁢ harmful, advocating for a return to⁢ prioritizing competence in hiring and leadership decisions.


The woke left’s coordinated assault on merit stems from a nihilistic desire — metaphorically speaking — to watch the world burn.

Thus, ironically, the wildfires raging in southern California might represent that desire’s literal realization.

Wednesday on the social media platform X, “Libs of TikTok,” a prominent conservative account with more than 3.9 million followers, called attention to the Los Angeles Fire Department’s “racial equity plan,” part of the department’s broader obsession with diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that, by definition, de-emphasize job-related competence.

Libs of TikTok also posted a screen shot of an LAFD chart showing “Racial Equity Staff Breakdown and Metrics.”

Indeed, a closer look reveals a much bleaker picture.

For instance, the LAFD has touted Fire Chief Kristin M. Crowley as the department’s “first female and LGBTQ Fire Chief.” That essential bit of information appeared in the first paragraph of her bio.

The second paragraph then began with the boast that “Chief Crowley leads a diverse department.”

Moreover, to stress the irrelevant point already made, Crowley’s bio concluded with the assurance that “[c]reating, supporting, and promoting a culture that values diversity, inclusion, and equity while striving to meet and exceed the expectations of the communities” constitute the chief’s priorities.

Conservative actor James Woods, who lost his home to the wildfires, would have preferred different priorities.

“Refilling the water reservoirs would have been a welcome priority, too, but I guess she had too much on her plate promoting diversity,” Woods posted to X on Wednesday.

Of course, the DEI-related obsession in the LAFD long predates Crowley. Indeed, that obsession first manifested, there and elsewhere, in race- and sex-based hiring quotas.

In a 58-second clip posted to X on Wednesday, conservative comedian Adam Carolla recalled that as a younger man he sought employment at a North Hollywood fire station, only to learn that he had to wait seven years to apply because he was not black, Hispanic, or a woman.

The point, of course, has nothing to do with Carolla specifically. Nor would anyone suggest that additional white male firefighters, on account of their whiteness and maleness, would extinguish these fires.

The point, quite simply, has to do with priorities.

For instance, when you prioritize appointing a black woman to the Supreme Court, you necessarily de-emphasize a prospective jurist’s competence. Thus, you run the risk of appointing someone like Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson, who checks the race- and sex-related boxes but also does not understand the Constitution.

Conversely, if you seek the best judges without regard to irrelevant physical characteristics, the resulting pool will include — eventually and inevitably — people from all walks of life who do not look the same. In that case, because you prioritized merit, no one will have cause to quibble with your choices on DEI grounds.

The same holds true for the LAFD. Had Crowley (and others before her) prioritized merit, then the people of southern California would know that they have the most capable firefighters working to help them.

That, however, did not happen. Instead of putting out fires, they focused on “diversity.”

Thus, Woods and others have good reasons for outrage.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker