The epoch times

Labor unions spend $25B on undisclosed political campaigns: Analysis.

Unreported Labor⁤ Union Political Spending in 2022 Closer⁣ to $25 Billion, Analysis Shows

Journalists reporting on union ​political activities typically cite the figure of $54⁤ million as the measure of labor ‌campaign and⁢ candidate‍ advocacy spending in 2022, but the actual total is closer to $25 billion, according to a new analysis ⁤of mandatory expenditure ‌reports by worker organizations.

The ⁣$54 million represents⁢ the total derived from union reports to the⁢ Federal Election Commission (FEC) for political action committees (PAC) spending during the ‌2022 campaign⁢ cycle.

But the analysis by the National Institute⁢ for Labor Relations ‌Research⁢ (NILRR) of unions’ LM-2 reports to the Department of Labor, as well⁤ as additional unreported spending by the labor groups, reveals much more.

Related Stories

The LM-2 documents cover overall spending by labor unions, which during the 2021-2022​ period reached $50 billion. Democratic candidates, causes, and committees typically receive more than 90 percent of all labor⁤ union political spending.

“The ​vast majority of what unions spend⁣ to influence elections and​ policymaking is not reported to ⁤the federal government as ‌political activities. Some expenditures are improperly labeled as ‘grants’ or ‘general overhead.’ Others are tucked‌ away⁣ in⁤ the ‌budgets of smaller union affiliates that aren’t required to file full financial⁤ disclosures,” according to⁣ the‌ NILRR report.

“However, the bulk of unreported political power is wielded by government union officials. They’re ⁢armed with the monopoly power to negotiate salaries, pensions,⁣ and hiring practices for‌ entire swaths of federal, state, ⁢and local government workers. This makes monopoly bargaining in the⁣ public sector, by its very nature, political,” the report said.

“Public sector unions exist solely to change government employment⁢ policies. They ⁢have legal ⁤leverage over‍ the policy ​process that other political ⁤groups do not have. Consequently, ‍the money spent staffing, organizing, and promoting government sector unions has more of a direct impact on politics ​than whatever⁤ other groups spend to persuade voters,” the report continued.

“When we take into account all the inherently political money spent⁤ by public sector unions, Big Labor’s true total political spending ‌for the 2021-2022 political cycle​ was over $25 billion,” according to ‌the report.

(Left to right) AFL-CIO and AFGE National VA Council, Eric ⁢Jenkins is joined by former Army Capt. Debra Gipson, National MEB/PEB Representative,​ The American Legion, Gerardo Avila and Assistant National ⁢Legislative Director, Disabled American Veterans, Paul Raymond Varela during a House Veterans Affairs Committee, Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs Subcommittee hearing‌ on ‘Defined Expectations: Evaluating VA’s Performance in​ the Service Member ⁢Transition Process’ in the Cannon House Office Building, May 29, 2014, ⁣in Washington. ​(Rod Lamkey/Getty ⁣Images)

Spokesmen for the American Federation of Government⁤ Employees (AFGE), the largest federal employee union, and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), which represents non-federal public employees, did not respond to The Epoch Times’ requests for comment on the NILRR analysis.

The Virginia-based NILRR is ‍associated ‌with the National Right to Work Committee, which advocates on behalf of state-level Right-to-Work laws that protect individuals’ right to keep ⁤their jobs without having to pay union dues as a ‌condition of ⁤employment. Twenty-six states ‌currently have Right to Work laws. Only 10.1 percent⁢ of all U.S. ‍workers are union members, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). ⁤
Mark Mix, president of​ the National Right to Work Committee in Springfield, Va. (Courtesy of⁣ the National Right to Work Committee)

In⁤ addition to the impact of public sector unions,‌ the major reason so much labor political spending goes unreported on official documents like⁢ FEC and LM-2 reports is labeling ​by union‌ officials of such expenditures with names of non-political categories such as “Representation,” ⁢“Contributions, ‍Gifts, and Grants,”‍ “General Overhead,” and “Union Administration,” according to NILRR.

Among the examples of such mislabeled spending‍ cited by the ‌report are the $12,675,000 in grants given by the National Education Association (NEA) to the State Engagement Fund, a Left-of-Center ⁢”dark money” advocacy.

Similarly, ‌”the AFL-CIO‍ gave a total of $8,446,314 to Working America, ⁢a union-affiliated ‌501(C)(4) advocacy⁣ group that ‘makes sure that the priorities of working ⁤people, their families and ‍communities are heard from our state houses to the White House, from our city councils and school boards to the halls of Congress,'” the ⁤NILRR report said.

And the United Brotherhood ⁤of Carpenters and ⁢Joiners of America gave $8 million to the Strategic Victory Fund, ‍another Left-of-Center 501(C)(4) tha


" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker