The latest “Twitter Files” Technology Giant Reveals His Embrace for Intel Community

The first “Twitter Files” We explored the evolution of the tech giant from resistance to acceptance of the intel community in 2023. 

Elon Musk’s eleventh installment. “Twitter Files,” Matt Taibbi, Substack’s writer, reported on the “PR crisis” Twitter was under attack in 2017 by Democrats who slammed the tech giant for failing to investigate Russian influence on its platform. Facebook had been public with removing suspicious foreign accounts after the 2016 presidential election. 

Twitter was launched amid pressure “Russia Task Force” It was necessary to determine whether the Kremlin maintained such a foothold on this platform, even after several accounts thought to be linked to Russia were suspended.

“First round of RU investigation… 15 high risk accounts, 3 of which have connections with Russia, although 2 are RT,” Taibbi shared a memo from October 2017.

You can also read: “Finished with investigation… 2500 full manual account reviews, we think this is exhaustive… 32 suspicious accounts and only 17 of those are connected with Russia, only 2 of those have significant spend one of which is Russia Today…remaining <$10k in spend."

Taibbi mentioned a BuzzFeed News report that had flagged 45 “fake propaganda accounts” Twitter, which were eventually suspended, and “leaks” The media reported on Congress and the proposed legislation of lawmakers, which further pressured the tech company to act.

“This cycle – threatened legislation, wedded to scare headlines pushed by congressional/intel sources, followed by Twitter caving to moderation asks – would later be formalized in partnerships with federal law enforcement,” Taibbi wrote Tuesday.

TWITTER TAKEOVER OF 2022: ELON MUSK’S WILD RIDE SINCE BUYING THE SOCIAL MEDIA GIANT

He highlighted the difference between Twitter’s. “external” policy stated that it would remove content “in our soul discretion,” While its “internal guidance” Please read this “any user identified by the U.S. intelligence community as a state-sponsored entity conducting cyber operations against targets associated with U.S. or other elections… shall not be allowed to advertise on Twitter.”

“We will not be reverting to the status quo,” Colin Crowell, Twitter’s then-VP Public Policy, shared his thoughts with his colleagues.

Each installment “Twitter Files” The journalists shared the article in long Twitter threads that addressed various controversies. Taibbi’s first installment, published in December, went viral. “Twitter Files” Focusing on Twitter’s internal conversations leading to its censorship Hunter Biden laptop story During the 2020 presidential election, some officials struggled to explain how it was violating its constitution “hacked materials” policies.

Later, it was revealed that the first batch “Twitter Files” Jim Baker, who had previously been the FBI’s deputy general counsel and was involved with the Russia probe, was appointed to verify the authenticity of Musk’s tweets. Musk fired Baker shortly afterward.

Baker was caught by Taibbi’s reporting regarding the suppression story Hunter Biden and told his colleagues. “I support the conclusion that we need more facts to assess whether the materials were hacked” But there was more “it’s reasonable for us to assume that they may have been and that caution is warranted.”

Taibbi reported that Taibbi first reported. “Although several sources recalled hearing about a ‘general’ warning from federal law enforcement that summer about possible foreign hacks, there’s no evidence – that I’ve seen – of any government involvement in the laptop story.” It is unknown if Baker participated in the vetting process. “Twitter Files” Taibbi was able to draw this conclusion, and Baker may have omitted files that would show the federal government intervening in the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story on Twitter. 

Elon Musk fired Jim Baker as Twitter’s deputy general attorney after he revealed that he had reviewed the first batch Twitter Files without Musk’s permission.
(Ron Sachs/Consolidated News Pictures/Getty Images

The Free Press editor Bari Weiss has published the second edition. This article revealed Twitter’s current status. “blacklisting” Many prominent conservatives, such as Fox News host Dan Bongino, Turning Point USA’s Charlie Kirk, and Stanford University’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya were opposed to locking downs.

In internal communications, staff at Twitter also admit that the popular right-wing account Libs of TikTok has never violated their rules. “hateful conduct” Even though they were repeatedly punished for it, policy. 

TWITTER FILES PART 5 REVEAL STAFFERS WHO DIDN’T BELIEVE TRUMP VIOLATED ‘INCITEMENT’ POLICY

These revelations seem to contradict the claims of former Twitter CEO. Jack Dorsey In 2018, he told Congress that Twitter didn’t censor or shadowban conservatives. 

The third, fourth, and fifth installments are available in the “Twitter Files” Focused on the permanent suspension and riot at the Capitol by former President Trump in January 2021.

Taibbi reported that Twitter circulated tweets about election topics from various users prior to the 2020 election. “flagged” The FBI deemed it to be problematic. 

Elon Musk tapped independent journalists Matt Taibbi, and Bari Weiss to report on the matter. “Twitter Files.”
(Daniel Zuchnik/WireImage, Bari Weiss)

Independent writer Michael Shellenberger said that Dorsey was calling it in while he was away on vacation. His deputies were trying to deplatform Trump. Yoel Roth, Twitter’s former head for trust and safety, was particularly involved in efforts to censor tweets related to the 2020 election. In the weeks before the election, Roth was known to have met weekly with the FBI and Department of Homeland Security as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. 

Weiss spoke about the pressure Twitter management was feeling from its employees. But, the Free Press editor also said that many Twitter staffers who enforce policies were not convinced Trump’s tweets of Jan. 6 violated their rules.

Vijaya Gadde was the then-Twitter head legal chief who asked Trump about his tweets. “coded incitement to further violence.” The so-called “Red Alert” appears just moments later. “scaled enforcement team” It was suggested that, based on the way Twitter interprets Trump’s tweets it could be violating violence incitement laws. 

The sixth part of the “Twitter Files” Twitter’s close relationship with the FBI was highlighted. Taibbi said that the law enforcement agency was acting in a similar way to a criminal. “subsidiary” The communications revealed that the FBI systemically flagged Twitter users who sent tweets that were not included by the tech giant. “possible violative content” These are related to the election. 

As a response to “Twitter Files,” Fox News Digital was told by a spokesperson for FBI “The FBI regularly engages with private sector entities to provide information specific to identified foreign malign influence actors’ subversive, undeclared, covert, or criminal activities. Private sector entities independently make decisions about what, if any, action they take on their platforms and for their customers after the FBI has notified them.”

Major concerns have been raised by the FBI’s routine contact of Twitter users who would face punishment for their tweets.  

The FBI Headquarters Building is visible in Washington, U.S. Prorussian hackers claim to have hacked FBI’s website this week.
(REUTERS/Yuri Gripas)

Shellenberger, in part seven, framed Twitter’s coziness to the FBI within the context of Hunter Biden’s laptop story. He showed the FBI’s repeated requests for Twitter to share sensitive information of its users which Twitter refused to do, and the FBI’s repeated inquiries into Twitter’s foreign activity leading up the 2020 election. Twitter claimed that it had not. Just one day after the New York Post published its Hunter Biden story, which was quickly censored by the Post, Twitter received ten unidentified documents from the FBI via its secure Teleport channel. 

One email dated February 2021 shows that Twitter was paid over $3.4 Million by the FBI since October 2019. As Twitter’s policies allow for reimbursements in the event of information being produced as part a legal process, it is clear that Twitter received this email.

Roth even took part in the so-called “The” “Hack-and-Dump Working Group” The Aspen Institute collaborated with Hunter Biden to create a simulation of how Big Tech and the media should deal with something like the Hunter Biden notebook. 

Fox News reported that the FBI was not feigned amid criticism and made a statement to Fox News. “The correspondence between the FBI and Twitter show nothing more than examples of our traditional, longstanding and ongoing federal government and private sector engagements, which involve numerous companies over multiple sectors and industries. As evidenced in the correspondence, the FBI provides critical information to the private sector in an effort to allow them to protect themselves and their customers… It is unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the American public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Part eight was shared by Lee Fang (Intercept investigative reporter), and exposed Twitter’s support for the Pentagon’s foreign influence campaigns. This allowed the military to use covert account to spread propaganda overseas, despite this being against Twitter’s policies. Taibbi reported separately in the ninth installment on Twitter’s ongoing interactions with “OGAs” (Other government agency) 

The tenth batch Twitter Files was reported by David Zweig. It focused on COVID, and the platform’s attempts to enforce it. “misinformation” Reporting and policy “both the Trump and Biden administrations directly pressed Twitter executives to moderate the platform’s pandemic content according to their wishes.” Zweig highlighted a memo written by Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s Head of U.S. Public Policy, who claimed the Biden team was “very angry” Twitter is not responding to concerns “de-platform” Many accounts based upon meetings with the White House. Musk teased that there were. “much more” Twitter files to reveal COVID in 2023, and who the top scientists and doctors were “actively suppressed on Twitter,” Presumably because they were against the White House approved narrative. 

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases