Supreme Court challenges legality of Hunter Biden’s gun charges in Bruen ruling.
The Second Amendment Ruling and its Potential Impact on Hunter Biden’s Legal Case
The landmark Second Amendment ruling at the Supreme Court last summer, which was condemned by President Joe Biden, may now serve as a legal lifeline for his recently indicted son, Hunter Biden.
Hunter Biden was indicted on Thursday on charges related to a gun purchase in 2018, including the alleged illegal possession of the firearm. However, prosecutors may face challenges due to the 2022 high court decision in Bruen v. New York Rifle & Pistol Association. This ruling has been used to scrutinize numerous federal firearm regulations.
The Bruen Ruling and its Impact
The Bruen ruling, which saw a six-member Republican-appointed majority on the Supreme Court declare that gun regulations must align with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation, has resulted in the partial or complete unconstitutionality of several state and federal gun control laws.
While lower court rulings have not overturned the statute in question, they have called for charges brought under it to be dismissed. For example, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voided charges for marijuana users who possessed firearms, stating that disarming a sober citizen based solely on past drug usage is not justified.
Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, plans to challenge the charges based on the Bruen opinion. They argue that the charges are unconstitutional and that Hunter Biden did not violate the law.
The Potential Defense Strategy
Legal experts suggest that defense lawyers for Hunter Biden could argue that the third count, which bans gun ownership or transport by anyone addicted to a controlled substance, is unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. They could also argue that the statute is vague in its definition of a drug user, making it unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment.
If the third count is successfully voided, the question arises as to how that would affect the first two counts, which involve lying about drug use to obtain a weapon illegally and falsely claiming not to be addicted to any controlled substance on a federal firearm form.
The Impact of the Bruen Ruling on Hunter Biden’s Case
While the Bruen ruling may have an impact on the third count, legal experts are more reserved about its effect on the charges related to the Form 4473 violations. Similar appeals court decisions have held that false representations on the form, such as listing false street addresses, violate federal code.
It is worth noting that prosecutors rarely bring charges under the federal code that Hunter Biden is accused of violating. In fiscal 2019, there were 478 referrals for lying on Form 4473, but only 298 cases were filed.
Despite the ruling in Bruen, major gun rights groups, including Gun Owners of America and the National Rifle Association, are not coming to Hunter Biden’s defense. They argue that as long as President Biden continues to pursue gun control measures, his son should face the same scrutiny as other gun owners.
What does the Bruen ruling establish in terms of evaluating the constitutionality of gun control laws?
Under the National Firearms Act, holding that the law was unconstitutional under the Bruen ruling. This interpretation of the Second Amendment as protecting an individual right to possess firearms for self-defense has cast doubt on the constitutionality of various gun control measures.
Potential Impact on Hunter Biden’s Legal Case
Hunter Biden’s legal case involves allegations of illegal possession of a firearm, which could potentially be impacted by the Bruen ruling. If Hunter Biden’s defense team can argue that the gun control laws he allegedly violated are unconstitutional under the Bruen ruling, they may have a stronger case for dismissal or reduced charges.
However, it is important to note that the Bruen ruling does not automatically invalidate all gun control laws. It merely establishes a framework for evaluating the constitutionality of such laws based on historical tradition. Each case will still be subject to individual analysis and interpretation in light of this ruling.
Furthermore, the Bruen ruling may not be as relevant to Hunter Biden’s case if the specific gun control laws he allegedly violated do not conflict with the historical tradition of firearm regulation as outlined in the ruling. It will be up to the court to determine how the Bruen ruling applies to Hunter Biden’s case and whether it provides a strong legal argument for him.
The Debate and Implications
The Second Amendment has long been a subject of debate in the United States, with proponents arguing for an individual’s right to bear arms and opponents advocating for stricter gun control measures. The Bruen ruling has further fueled this debate and has the potential to reshape the landscape of gun control laws across the country.
While some view the Bruen ruling as a step towards safeguarding Second Amendment rights and ensuring Constitutional protections, others express concerns that it may weaken gun control measures designed to promote public safety. The impact of this ruling on Hunter Biden’s case is just one example of the broader implications it may have on legal battles and debates surrounding gun control.
Conclusion
The Second Amendment ruling in Bruen v. New York Rifle & Pistol Association has captured national attention and sparked legal discussions regarding the constitutionality of gun control laws. In the case of Hunter Biden, the ruling may potentially provide a legal lifeline, allowing his defense team to challenge the constitutionality of the gun control laws he allegedly violated. However, the ultimate outcome of his case will depend on the specific laws involved and how they align with the historical tradition of firearm regulation established by the Bruen ruling. This landmark decision highlights the ongoing debate surrounding the Second Amendment and its implications for gun control measures in the United States.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...