Liberal Media Scream: PBS twists Trump press pool diversity as ‘sinister’ – Washington Examiner
The article discusses criticism directed at PBS regarding its portrayal of the Trump administration’s press pool changes. Recently,White House Press secretary Karoline Leavitt opted to select who participates in the daily press pool,arguing that the existing arrangement favored legacy media outlets and excluded newer,conservative ones. PBS’s Amna Nawaz described this decision as an “attack on the press,” wiht Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart labeling the situation as ”sinister.” The article contrasts PBS’s reaction with the lack of scrutiny toward similar actions taken by previous administrations, such as Biden revoking press passes for conservative outlets. the author argues that Trump’s adjustments are aimed at increasing media diversity, rather than limiting press access, and assesses the mainstream media’s outrage as exaggerated.
Liberal Media Scream: PBS twists Trump press pool diversity as ‘sinister’
Here’s another reason for all the PBS and NPR critics to call for federal tax dollar defunding. Instead of cheering the expansion of media allowed into the White House press pool, PBS declared it a “sinister” move to censor the press.
This week’s Liberal Media Scream features the outlet’s twisted view of White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s decision to take charge of choosing who is in the daily pool that covers White House events for the rest of the press when there isn’t enough room for all, such as the near-daily back-and-forths President Donald Trump hosts in the Oval Office.
She made the decision because she believed that the White House Correspondents’ Association was being too selective by favoring legacy media and barring new-age social media and conservative outlets.
Karoline Leavitt just destroyed Howard Kurtz over the decision to stop relying on the White House Correspondents Association for press pools.
She tells him WHCA had a monetized monopoly on press coverage that began over 100 years ago before radio existed.pic.twitter.com/pgBxtegVuy
— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) March 2, 2025
The old guard protested, though, in its first week of operation, the new pool remained heavy with legacy media. One exception was the Associated Press, which Trump’s team omitted because the news service won’t recognize the president’s executive order renaming the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, as the government has.
In our example, PBS NewsHour co-anchor Amna Nawaz called the White House move an attack on the press, prompting contributor and Washington Post columnist Jonathan Capehart to chirp that “we are in more sinister territory” with Trump and the media.
Of course neither talked up former President Joe Biden’s move to take away the press passes of over 400 mainly conservative outlets or former President Barack Obama’s seizing of phone records from AP or others in his dragnet for leakers.
From Friday’s PBS News Hour:
AMNA NAWAZ: His continued attacks on the press, blocking the AP’s access from some White House coverage as well. You saw him take control of the White House, take control of the press pool that covers the president full time, makes sure everyone else knows what’s happening with the president. Peter Baker, of course, longtime Russia correspondent, said it reminded him of the Kremlin press pool takeover. And I just want to get your takes on where that sort of attack on the press stands and whether we’re in much more sinister territory now.
JONATHAN CAPEHART: I do think we are in more sinister territory because you’ve got to look at what’s happening with AP, in light of his lawsuits against CBS, against ABC, threats, threatening the licenses of other broadcast entities. This is all part of a pattern of roughing up anyone he views as not either insufficiently loyal or people who have wronged him. And he looks at the press as an entity that has wronged him.
SEE THE LATEST POLITICAL NEWS AND BUZZ FROM WASHINGTON SECRETS
Brent Baker, the Steven P.J. Wood senior fellow and vice president for research and publications at the Media Research Center, explained our pick: “Imagine that. President Trump sees ‘the press as an entity that has wronged him.’ And he’s fighting back, which really upsets the legacy media despite the fact that nothing he has done has blocked the public from full access. It’s hardly ‘sinister’ just because the White House is allowing a more ideological diverse group of outlets to get access instead of just a few privileged and entitled journalists.”
Rating: Three out of five screams.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
PBS will probably not be around much longer. Unless of course some leftist wants to fund it. Maybe Soros.