The daily wire

Streisand Effect’ Strikes: Singer’s Effort to Divert Attention from NY Post Fails

Barbra Streisirthat tried to ⁣distract her followers from The New York Post’s reporting on ⁣President Joe Biden by asserting that the publication ‌was‌ spreading lies about him. However, her attempt to ​suppress the visibility of these reports backfired ⁤and resulted in increased attention to The New York Post, a phenomenon known as the “Streisand Effect.” This term is named after Streisand herself, originating from her earlier attempt to suppress photographs of her Malibu mansion,⁣ which only led to more public interest and circulation ​of the ‌images. Social media ​users highlighted the irony of her recent actions on platforms such as Twitter, noting how she unintentionally drew more attention to the article she intended to downplay.


Singer and actress Barbra Streisand found herself at the mercy of a phenomenon named after her — The Streisand Effect — when she attempted to drive people away from The New York Post on Monday, prompting the exact opposite response.

It all began with a post on X in which the singer implored her hundreds of thousands of followers to ignore reporting from The Post because it included negative stories about President Joe Biden.

“The NY Post is printing lies about President Biden. No other media outlets should amplify its disinformation,” she said.

But then she fell victim to The Streisand Effect — which, as described by Grok, states that the amount of attention a thing gets is inversely proportional to the amount of attention you want it to get.

The Streisand effect is a phenomenon where attempts to hide or suppress information actually result in increased publicity and awareness of that information. It’s like trying to cover up a secret only to have it plastered all over the front page of a newspaper. The term was coined after American singer and actress Barbra Streisand tried to suppress photos of her Malibu mansion, which only led to more people seeking out and sharing those very photos. So, the lesson here is: sometimes the more you try to hide something, the more attention it gets.

“Barbara Streisand is apparently completely unaware of the ‘Streisand Effect.’ This is the most unintentionally hilarious thing I have seen lately …” one social media user pointed out via X, sharing Grok’s explanation.

“Literal Streisand effect,” conservative communications strategist Steve Guest remarked.

“Wow, she did the thing,” Washington Free Beacon reporter Chuck Ross added.

“‘Do not look at this thing I don’t want you to look at’ said Streisand! How can this be real? The writers are outdoing themselves in 2024!” conservative pundit Mary Katherine Ham posted.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

“The phenomenon of telling people to not share something only to have it spectacularly backfire is literally named after you,” Noam Blum pointed out.

“This is like watching Dr. Heimlich dislodge a blockage in a choking person’s airway,” podcaster Justin Young posted in response.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker