IRS diversity training includes material from a trans academic advocating for the “death of whiteness
The IRS’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Training Sparks Controversy
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has come under fire for its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training, which featured content from a transgender professor advocating for the “death of whiteness.” The training, obtained by Judicial Watch, was part of a mandatory program for IRS investigators and included a section by Dafina Lazarus Stewart, a transgender professor at the University of Denver.
Stewart, who has focused her academic work on “whiteness,” called on other academics to “commit to the death of whiteness” in an academic journal article. The training materials also included questions that seemed to suggest that “whiteness” was a threat to other cultures.
This training is just one example of the Biden administration’s efforts to promote far-left ideology on race and gender. The administration has signed executive orders to institutionalize Critical Race Theory and radical gender ideology in federal agencies.
Stewart’s article, titled “‘Dead Honky’ – Against The Technologies of (White) Violence,” argues that “whiteness is itself a violence” and calls for Critical Race Theorists to “commit to the death of whiteness.” The article was published in the International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, which has also published articles advocating for the eradication of whiteness.
The IRS’s Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion, led by Chief Diversity Officer Carrie Holland, is responsible for implementing the DEI agenda. The previous Chief Diversity Officer, Valerie Gunter, made a salary of $200,000 a year, more than double the median household income.
This training is part of a larger trend of DEI initiatives being pushed throughout the federal government. The National Security Association (NSA) created a DEI glossary endorsing Critical Race Theory and gender ideology, and other agencies have funded projects promoting gender ideology.
While the Biden administration continues to push its ideological agenda, there are plans to dismantle the administrative state under a potential Trump presidency in 2024. Advocates for a policy called Schedule F aim to remove civil service employment protections from unelected bureaucrats, giving the president the power to fire those who obstruct his policy objectives.
Should the IRS prioritize its limited resources towards promoting a divisive social ideology or towards improving taxpayer services and reducing fraud
A professor of higher education at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.
Stewart’s section of the training, titled “Understanding Whiteness and Building an Authentic White Identity,” has sparked controversy and criticism for its divisive and potentially offensive content. In her presentation, Stewart argues that whiteness is a social construct that perpetuates inequality and suggests that individuals should aim for the “death of whiteness” in order to achieve a more equitable society.
Many believe that the inclusion of such extreme views in a mandatory training program for IRS investigators is inappropriate and raises concerns about bias within the agency. The IRS is responsible for enforcing tax laws and collecting revenue for the federal government, and its employees should be trained in a fair and unbiased manner.
Critics argue that introducing controversial and politically charged ideas into a training session for IRS investigators undermines the agency’s credibility and impartiality. It is essential that the IRS be seen as an objective institution that treats all taxpayers fairly and without any preference or bias. Including content that promotes the ”death of whiteness” may give the impression that the IRS is endorsing a particular political agenda, which undermines its ability to carry out its duties effectively.
Furthermore, opponents of the training argue that it is unnecessary and distracts from the IRS’s primary functions. Instead of focusing on enforcing tax laws and ensuring compliance, the agency seems to be devoting resources to promoting a divisive social ideology. Some believe that the IRS’s limited resources should be directed towards improving taxpayer services and reducing fraud, rather than engaging in controversial and potentially inflammatory training programs.
In response to the controversy, the IRS has defended its diversity, equity, and inclusion training as an important tool for creating a more inclusive work environment. The agency argues that it is committed to fostering a workplace culture that values diversity and ensures equal treatment for all employees.
However, it is important to note that diversity and inclusion training should aim to promote understanding, empathy, and respect among employees. While it is important to acknowledge and address issues of inequality and discrimination, it is equally crucial to do so in a manner that does not demonize or alienate any particular group.
In conclusion, the IRS’s diversity, equity, and inclusion training has ignited controversy due to the inclusion of divisive and potentially offensive content. This training, featuring a section by a transgender professor advocating for the “death of whiteness,” raises concerns about bias and the impartiality of the agency. The IRS should ensure that its training programs promote unity, respect, and fairness among employees, while also focusing on its core responsibilities of tax enforcement and taxpayer service.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...