Mary Poppins’ new PG rating due to ‘discriminatory language’ sparks strong backlash: ‘Unfortunate situation
The Renowned Mary Poppins Film Receives Controversial Rating Change
The beloved and magical nanny, Mary Poppins, has recently faced a heated response as the iconic 1964 film has been reclassified with a PG rating. The British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) made this decision due to what they deemed as “discriminatory language” present in the movie.
According to reports, the BBFC ruled that certain content in the film is “unsuitable for young children.” Specifically, they found the use of the word “Hottentots” to be racially offensive. This term, historically used by Europeans to refer to nomadic Khoekhoe herders in South Africa, is mentioned twice in the film.
Once, Admiral Boom asks the Banks children if they are “going to fight the Hottentots,” and another time he exclaims that he is being “attacked by the Hottentots” as chimney sweepers dance on the roof, covered in chimney soot.
The BBFC explained their decision, stating that their research on racism and discrimination revealed that parents are concerned about exposing children to offensive language or behavior. They believe that content with clear condemnation is more suitable for a lower rating.
Prior to this change, the film had a U rating, indicating it was suitable for all audiences. However, the new PG rating has sparked criticism on social media.
“What a sad state of affairs,” expressed one user. “After 60 years, the UK age rating for the Mary Poppins movie has been raised because of ‘discriminatory language’.”
Another comment highlighted the misplaced priorities, stating, “People are dying in the streets, and some bright spark thinks we need protecting from Mary Poppins? This world terrifies me.”
Amidst the controversy, some users pointed out the inconsistency in societal standards, with one user remarking, “According to the left, children are fully capable of consenting to hormone replacement therapy and mastectomies. But watching Mary Poppins is a bridge too far.”
It is clear that the reclassification of the Mary Poppins film has ignited a passionate debate, raising questions about the balance between protecting children and preserving the cultural significance of beloved classics.
Read more:
What are the arguments for and against altering the rating of a film like Mary Poppins to remove derogatory racial slurs and offensive language?
Nsive and harmful. The BBFC stated that this term, which is considered a derogatory racial slur, goes against their guidelines for films that are suitable for general audiences. As a result, they decided to alter the film’s rating from a U (Universal) to a PG (Parental Guidance) rating, indicating that some material may not be suitable for young children.
Mary Poppins, based on the beloved children’s books by P.L. Travers, has been a staple in family entertainment since its release. The movie tells the story of a magical nanny who brings joy and order to the lives of the Banks family. With its catchy songs, memorable characters, and enchanting adventures, Mary Poppins has touched the hearts of millions of viewers over the years.
The controversy surrounding the film’s rating change stems from debates over historical context and cultural sensitivity. Some argue that altering the film’s rating is a necessary step in acknowledging and rectifying outdated and offensive representations of race. They believe that children should not be exposed to racial slurs and derogatory language, even within a historical context.
Others, however, contend that changing the film’s rating is an unnecessary censorship, and that it is important for children to learn about the historical context in which these offensive terms were used. They argue that by censoring or altering the film, the opportunity to educate children about the past is missed.
The reclassification of Mary Poppins raises questions about the responsibility of film classification boards in addressing the portrayal of sensitive issues in movies. While many can agree that racial slurs should not be condoned or promoted, the decision to change the rating of a beloved classic film poses challenges and debates within society. The ongoing conversation around how to handle offensive or outdated language in popular culture is an important one, as it forces us to confront uncomfortable aspects of our history.
It is crucial to note that the objective of the BBFC in reclassifying Mary Poppins is not to diminish the film’s value, but rather to create a more accurate representation of its content in relation to modern societal standards. The revised rating serves as a reminder that our understanding and interpretation of movies can evolve over time, especially when it comes to issues of race, representation, and inclusivity.
Ultimately, the controversy surrounding the change in rating for Mary Poppins serves as a reminder that cultural sensitivity and historical accuracy can often collide, and that it is essential to approach these discussions with careful consideration and thoughtful dialogue. As audiences continue to grapple with questions of representation and the impact of language, it is crucial for film classification boards, filmmakers, and society as a whole to engage in open and constructive conversations to ensure that cinematic experiences remain both enjoyable and educational for all viewers.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
