The federalist

Men are silently eradicating America’s authentic Revolution daughters

Daughters of the American Revolution: A Changing Landscape

Step ⁣into the world of the Daughters ‍of the American Revolution (DAR), one of America’s oldest genealogical societies. ​In a surprising twist, this prestigious group is breaking tradition by allowing ⁢men who identify as women to join⁤ their ranks. The catch? They must provide an altered birth certificate that⁢ identifies their sex as female.

Unsurprisingly, this new policy has sparked controversy among current and former DAR members. They point out the irony of using altered documents for ⁣membership in an⁢ organization that ⁣values accurate historical ⁤records. But the irony runs deeper for those familiar with DAR’s origins.

“DAR ⁤was founded in 1890 because women weren’t allowed to join ⁤the Sons of the American Revolution⁣ [SAR],” member Linda Smith revealed. Once again, a space that ‌women fought for in response to male exclusion ‌is being taken away.

DAR holds a special place among historical groups in the United States. Discovering a‌ biological connection to early Americans who fought in the Revolutionary ‌War is a deeply meaningful experience for descendants. The Sons of the American Revolution, established in 1889, catered exclusively to men. In response, four courageous women formed⁣ the Daughters of the American⁢ Revolution​ one year‍ later, creating a refuge ​for women who wanted to bond over their shared connection to America’s founding.

With their motto “God, home, and country,” DAR has always been‍ dedicated to America’s founding values. Allowing radical gender ideology, the new religion of an ⁤increasingly irreverent and unpatriotic⁤ West, ⁣to⁤ infiltrate⁤ the group is undoubtedly a difficult pill to swallow. Judy Lindsay, regent of Wyoming’s Cheyenne chapter, revealed that DAR leadership implemented the‌ new policy in a way that can only be described as misleading.

Vague Wording Raises Questions

During the 2023 Continental Congress, where DAR’s annual leadership convention took ⁢place, the bylaw amendments ⁤were presented. However, the new language was vaguely worded and did not explicitly state that males would be admitted to the⁤ society. Instead, the existing bylaw was amended to prevent “unlawful discrimination against an eligible applicant…‍ for any ⁤characteristic protected ⁢by applicable law.”

When questioned about this change, DAR ​stated that the new language was ‍meant to update and​ strengthen their existing non-discrimination policy. They ⁤also acknowledged that certain chapters ⁤had already allowed men to join if their birth certificates listed them as female.

However, many DAR members were surprised and disturbed by the new language at the 2023 Continental Congress. On ⁢the livestream, multiple members ‍can ​be heard asking if ⁤the updated policy would allow men who identify as women to join DAR. It was clear that even those in ​attendance were unaware of what was happening.

Lindsay claims that most DAR members are just now finding out about the‍ policy ​change. She⁢ also alleges‍ that even those who voted for the new language did so under pressure.

Silencing Dissent

Amy Barron, a former DAR member and chaplain, attempted to voice her concerns about⁢ the policy at a chapter meeting but was silenced by chapter leadership. ⁢Frustrated, she chose to resign from the organization.

Former‌ DAR member Brenda Becker, who ⁣served on her chapter’s executive board, organized an online ⁤group called “Biological Daughters”⁢ after members’ comments about the issue were removed from DAR’s official online forum. Through this group, 13 chapters from around the country united in ⁣opposition to the new amendment.

It’s important to note⁣ that DAR ⁣has never been a political organization. That’s​ why many members, like Barron, are baffled by the society’s involvement in one of the most controversial political issues of our time – the erasure⁤ of women​ and women’s ​spaces. ⁣Other genealogical societies, such as SAR ​and Colonial ‍Dames, have not implemented similar changes.

Preserving Dignity, History, and Truth

The Daughters of the American Revolution have always been dedicated to‌ preserving the spirit of their revolutionary ancestors. Inspired by their ⁢legacy,‍ DAR members‌ who oppose the ⁢new policy are fighting for dignity, history, and truth. Former DAR ‍member Brenda ‌Becker’s chapter has proposed an⁤ amendment to the updated bylaw, which they hope ‌will⁣ be ‌discussed at the 2024 Continental Congress. This​ amendment would define the‍ word “woman” and require original birth certificates and/or ​DNA tests for eligibility.

As the debate over ‍gender identity continues, the Daughters‌ of the⁢ American⁤ Revolution​ find themselves at a crossroads. Will they uphold their founding values and protect the spaces they fought so hard to create? Only time will tell.


⁤What are the arguments in favor of admitting ​men ‌who identify as ‍women into DAR, and how do⁢ they relate to ‍principles of inclusivity and equality?

Becoming aware of the policy change and ‌the controversy it has generated. She ‌argues that the vague wording‍ of‍ the amendment was⁢ intentional, as DAR leadership​ knew it would ⁢be met with resistance if explicitly stated that men who identify as women would ⁣be admitted to ⁣the society.

The ⁤decision to allow men who identify‌ as⁣ women to join⁣ DAR raises questions about the future direction of the organization. Critics argue that​ this move goes‍ against the⁢ very‌ foundation of DAR,‌ which‌ was established as a space ⁤for women‍ to ‍connect and celebrate their shared ⁣connection to‍ America’s founding. ⁢Allowing men to join under the umbrella of altered birth certificates undermines the ​historical significance and importance​ of DAR.

Furthermore, some argue that this decision ⁤is a reflection of broader societal changes and the influence of ‌radical gender ideology. Instead ⁣of ⁤remaining steadfast in their dedication to America’s founding values,⁤ DAR​ has succumbed to the ​pressure of an increasingly⁣ irreverent and unpatriotic society. They⁤ have⁣ allowed political correctness to override their⁤ commitment to preserving accurate historical records and honoring the​ accomplishments ⁤and sacrifices of ⁣the women who formed DAR over a century ago.

Others argue ‌that ​this decision is a step forward in inclusivity ⁤and equality. They believe that everyone should have the opportunity to connect ⁤with ​their ancestry and heritage, regardless of their gender identity. ⁤Admitting‌ men who identify as women into‌ DAR allows a broader​ range⁢ of individuals​ to explore and celebrate​ their connection⁢ to America’s founding.

The debate surrounding the‍ admission of men who identify ​as women⁤ into DAR will likely continue to divide members and ⁤provoke discussions about the⁢ organization’s core values‌ and ⁣purpose. As society evolves, historical ⁣organizations like DAR will face challenges ​in adapting to changing attitudes and expectations. Only⁢ time⁢ will tell how this decision will impact DAR’s future and⁤ its ability to uphold its mission⁢ in preserving and promoting America’s historical legacy.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker