Michigan salon refuses service to transgender individuals following Supreme Court decision.

The Owner of a Hair Salon in Traverse City, Michigan, Sparks Controversy with Refusal to Serve Transgender Customers

The owner of Studio 8 Hair Lab, Christine Geiger, has recently made headlines after vowing to refuse service to transgender customers. In a now-deleted Facebook post, Geiger cited her First Amendment rights and expressed her belief that transgender individuals should seek services at a local pet groomer instead.

“You are not welcome at this salon. Period. Should you request to have a particular pronoun used please note we may simply refer to you as ‘hey you.'”

This controversial statement comes in the wake of a Supreme Court ruling on denying service to LGBT clients. The case, 303 Creative v. Elenis, saw a 6-3 decision in favor of a website designer who feared punishment under Colorado’s anti-discrimination law for refusing service to same-sex couples based on her Christian beliefs.

A Divisive Ruling

The Supreme Court’s ruling has sparked intense debate, with pro-LGBT advocacy groups criticizing the majority’s decision. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, leading the dissent, expressed concern over the court granting businesses the right to refuse service to protected classes.

“Today, the Court, for the first time in its history, grants a business open to the public a constitutional right to refuse to serve members of a protected class.”

Geiger’s initial Facebook post gained significant attention online before being deleted. However, she later clarified her position in a subsequent post, stating that she would not serve transgender individuals due to her unwillingness to cater to requests outside of what she perceives as normal.

“This stance was taken to ensure that clients have the best experience, and I am admitting that since I am not willing to play the pronoun game or cater to requests outside of what I perceive as normal, this probably isn’t the best option for that type of client.”

Geiger’s comments have not gone unnoticed by Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel, who has received several complaints related to the salon owner’s discriminatory statements. Nessel, a lesbian herself, has made it clear that the Supreme Court’s ruling will not impact LGBT individuals in the state and that Michigan’s recently amended Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act remains in effect.

Traverse City, where the salon is located, holds additional significance in relation to the LGBTQ+ community. It is the hometown of Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg’s family and his husband. Buttigieg, the first openly gay member of a president’s Cabinet, has been a prominent advocate for LGBTQ+ rights.

The Alliance Defending Freedom, representing Lorie Smith in the 303 Creative case, sees the Supreme Court’s decision as a victory for individuals from all walks of life. They argue that it protects the rights of an “LGBT graphic designer who doesn’t want to be forced to create art and promote messages that they disagree with.”

The ruling, however, is limited to creative tasks and duties that are strictly expressive. It does not grant individuals the right to discriminate against those with protected characteristics, such as members of the LGBT community.

Smith’s position is clear: she is willing to conduct business with individuals who have protected characteristics as long as the requested graphics and websites do not violate her beliefs.

*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases