Montana judge supports youth activists in groundbreaking climate trial.
Judge Rules in Favor of Young Activists in Landmark Climate Change Trial
In a groundbreaking decision, a judge in Montana has sided with 16 young activists in the nation’s first climate change trial. The judge ruled that state agencies violated the plaintiffs’ right to a clean environment, as guaranteed by the state’s Constitution, by promoting the use of fossil fuels.
The trial, which lasted two weeks, saw attorneys for the plaintiffs present compelling evidence linking elevated greenhouse gases in the atmosphere to more frequent and extreme weather events. The young activists, ranging in age from 5 to 22, argued that these climate changes were negatively impacting their ability to lead clean and healthy lives in Montana.
The plaintiffs highlighted the detrimental effects of climate change on their mental and physical health, including the choking smoke from wildfires and the drying out of rivers that sustain agriculture, fish, wildlife, and recreation.
Related Stories
Native Americans who testified for the plaintiffs also emphasized how climate change was impacting their ceremonies and traditional food sources.
District Court Judge Kathy Seeley, in her ruling, acknowledged the plaintiffs’ legal standing and the “past and ongoing injuries” they have suffered due to the state’s inaction on greenhouse gases and climate change. She emphasized that every additional ton of greenhouse gas emissions exacerbates the plaintiffs’ injuries and poses a risk of irreversible climate damage.
Judge Seeley further stated that the injuries suffered by the young activists would worsen over time unless science-based measures are taken to address climate change. She affirmed that the plaintiffs have proven their concrete and distinguishable injuries, setting a new precedent for future climate change cases.
The judge also declared the state’s policy for evaluating fossil fuel permits, which does not consider greenhouse gas emissions, as unconstitutional. Montana’s significant per capita emissions and historical contribution to greenhouse gas emissions were highlighted as well.
Efforts by Montana’s governor, attorney general, and Republican supermajorities to prevent the lawsuit from going to court were unsuccessful. The state’s reliance on the production of oil, gas, and coal posed challenges to the case.
Julia Olson, executive director of advocacy group Our Children’s Trust, hailed the Montana ruling as a “game-changer” in climate change legislation. She emphasized that this is the first time a court has ruled on the merits of a case, affirming that the government violated children’s rights by promoting fossil fuels.
Kian Tanner, one of the plaintiffs, expressed his satisfaction with the ruling, stating that it demonstrates that the voices of the youth are being heard. He believes that this decision sets a precedent not only for the United States but for the world.
The young activists did not seek monetary compensation through their lawsuit. However, it is now up to the Montana Legislature to determine how to bring the state’s policies into compliance. The state has 60 days to decide whether to appeal the decision to the Montana Supreme Court.
Only a few states, including Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and New York, have taken significant steps to address climate change. The Montana ruling serves as a powerful reminder of the urgent need for action to protect our environment and future generations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...