Washington Examiner

Montana leads 18 states in challenging Maryland’s gun law.

Montana Attorney General Challenges Maryland County’s “Unconstitutional” Gun-Free Zones

Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen (R-MT) has taken a stand against a‌ Maryland county law that he believes violates the Supreme Court’s‌ Second ⁢Amendment test. Knudsen, along with​ a group of ‌18 ‍attorneys general, filed an amicus brief in ​the U.S. ⁣Court of Appeals ⁣for the 4th Circuit, urging the court to side with plaintiffs who argue that the law creates “unconstitutional” ⁢gun-free buffer zones.

A Personal Passion for the Second Amendment

When⁢ asked about his involvement in the⁣ case, Knudsen expressed his personal connection to⁣ the Second Amendment. As​ an avid hunter, reloader, and‍ competitive ⁣shooter,​ he closely follows issues related to gun rights. He believes that⁣ if laws like⁣ the one in‍ Maryland go unchallenged, ​similar regulations could be attempted in other states.

Montana’s assistant solicitor general outlined in the brief that‌ the⁢ Montgomery County law prohibits ​the sale, transfer,​ or possession of firearms within ⁤100 yards​ of a place of ⁣public assembly. The definition of a “place of public assembly” includes various locations such ⁢as parks, places of⁣ worship, schools, libraries, recreational facilities, multipurpose exhibition facilities, and​ childcare facilities.

The plaintiffs in the case,​ supported by ⁣the 19⁣ states, argue that⁤ the law effectively prevents⁢ anyone besides designated security⁣ guards and active ‍police ‌officers from carrying a gun‌ for self-defense in public. They claim that⁣ it⁣ is practically impossible for permit⁤ holders to legally carry a ‍handgun ⁢within‍ Montgomery County.

The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision‍ in Bruen v. ‍New York Rifle & Pistol Association established that while governments can regulate​ the public carrying of guns, they cannot prohibit it for law-abiding citizens. The court ‌also⁣ acknowledged that ‌”sensitive ​places” can be designated ⁣as ‌gun-free zones, but did not provide ‍a⁤ clear⁣ definition of what qualifies as sensitive.

Montana’s‍ brief argues⁢ that the historical ⁤record does not support the notion that places of worship, parks, recreational facilities, multipurpose ⁣exhibition facilities, public libraries, and‍ buffer zones have traditionally been subject ⁤to firearm ⁤restrictions.⁣ The attorneys general of⁤ 18 other states have also signed the brief in support of challenging the ‌Maryland⁣ law.

The legal battle over Maryland’s gun ⁣laws extends beyond Montgomery​ County.‍ The state’s SB1 law, signed by Governor Wes Moore, has faced opposition from the National Rifle Association and other gun groups. These groups are challenging the law’s ‌increased concealed ‍carry ⁢permit ⁢fees ⁢and expansion ‍of “gun-free zones” in the ⁤state.

The response from ⁤Montgomery County’s⁤ counsel is expected by‌ September 19, and further proceedings ‌will⁢ follow.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker