Musk and the DOGE Team Sit Down for an Interview: ‘This Is a Revolution’

The article discusses an interview in which Elon Musk expresses revolutionary views about the potential impact of his initiatives,particularly in government,drawing parallels to the american Revolution. Musk suggests that the changes he envisions could substantially improve the state of America, making it more efficient and solvent. He criticizes those who oppose such reforms, labeling them as fraudsters who complain out of a sense of false indignation. The piece highlights the echo of revolutionary sentiments from the Founding Fathers, suggesting that modern-day initiatives, like the cryptocurrency DOGE, represent a form of rebellion against perceived government tyranny. The author connects these ideas to historical criticisms of british governance and laments the modern concentration of wealth,hinting at a systemic issue that resonates with the revolutionary ideals of freedom and justice. the narrative intertwines historical reflection with contemporary political discourse.


As they say on social media, inject this directly into my veins.

In fact, if President Donald Trump achieves nothing besides what his friend and ally Elon Musk described in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier on Thursday, then Trump will have earned his rightful place in the Pantheon of American legends, and every patriotic American should personally volunteer his or her time to help carve Trump’s likeness onto Mount Rushmore.

Indeed, speaking of legends, Musk spoke in revolutionary terms that would have made the Founding Fathers proud.

Owner of the social media platform X and head of Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, Musk sounded like an ungovernable rebel in a tricorn hat from a more heroic era.

“Well, this is a revolution,” Musk said in a clip posted to X. “And I think it might be the biggest revolution in government since the original Revolution.”

Again, straight into my veins. Now.

“But at the end of the day America’s gonna be in much better shape,” he continued. “America will be solvent. The critical programs that people depend upon will work. And it’s gonna be a fantastic future.”

Then, Musk correctly identified the loudest of all counterrevolutionaries.

“You know, one of the things I learned at PayPal,” he said, “was the — you know who complains the loudest? And with the most amount of fake righteous indignation? The fraudsters.”

Indeed, fraud on an incomprehensible scale has made the Washington, D.C., suburbs America’s wealthiest counties. Only theft can explain the concentration of wealth in an area that produces nothing of value.

Readers who would like to watch the entire 38-minute interview may do so in the YouTube video below.

Of all the discoveries I made during 20 years of studying, researching, and teaching Early American History, nothing struck me with such illuminating force as the realization that the Founding Fathers protested and then actively resisted British imperial overreach not because they hated monarchy — at least not at first — but because they recognized that the most alarming threat to their freedom came from nameless and faceless tyrants in the imperial government.

In fact, if it helps, think of those tyrants as members of the 18th-century British deep state.

“There seems to be a direct and formal design on foot, to enslave all America,” John Adams wrote in 1765.

Nine years later, the malice of British officialdom, reflected in the pattern of their behavior, led Thomas Jefferson to the same conclusion.

“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day,” Jefferson wrote in 1774, “but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate and systematical plan of reducing us to slavery.”

Note the phrases “seems to be a direct and formal design” and “pursued unalterably through every change of ministers.” Who were those scoundrels that seemed to direct affairs in London? And did well-connected collaborators assist them from inside colonial governments? Either way, those tyrants did not answer to the Americans whose lives and resources they presumed to command.

If that sounds familiar, then you understand why DOGE exists.

Trump, of course, has already drawn comparisons to George Washington.

Now Musk, it seems, has adopted the perspective of Adams, Jefferson, and other learned men of their era who burned with indignation not against their fellow British subjects, and by 1774 not even against King George III, but against the nameless and faceless government officials whose tyranny necessitated a real revolution.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker