Nathan Wade’s lawyer to testify in Trump election case
OAN’s Abril Elfi
11:19 AM – Tuesday, February 27, 2024
Nathan Wade’s Divorce Attorney Summoned to Testify Again in Trump’s Georgia Election Case
On Monday, sources familiar with the case told reporters that Fulton County Judge Scott McAfee had ruled that Wade’s former law partner and divorce attorney, Terrence Bradley, is being asked to take the stand again in order to testify on topics not covered by the attorney-client privilege clause during the election case against Trump.
Willis’s disqualification from the case is being sought by former Trump staffer Michael Roman and several other co-defendants in the 45th president’s election case on the grounds that she profited financially from a “personal, romantic relationship” with Wade, whom she hired as a prosecutor for the case.
Although Willis and Wade acknowledged their personal relationship, they insisted that it “has never involved direct or indirect financial benefit to District Attorney Willis” and that it “does not amount to a disqualifying conflict of interest.”
The defense has argued that Bradley has evidence showing Wade and Willis’ relationship started before he was ever hired for the case, which contradicts testimonies told in court.
When Bradley had been asked a related question during a February 15th court hearing, he denied to answer, citing “attorney-client privilege.”
As the legal defense works to have Willis removed from the election case and to have the charges dropped, his return to the witness stand may result in important disclosures.
Bradley could be required to testify on Tuesday afternoon.
In August, Trump, Roman, and 17 others pleaded not guilty to all charges in the indictment for alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election in the state of Georgia.
Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts
The latest phone outage sparks concern over a national cyber-attack which could hit our nation sooner than we think.
Joe Biden could have a tough time winning Michigan’s primary, as Democrats could vote uncommitted.
Utah Senate Candidate Trent Staggs lays out his plan to drain the swamp and solidify the Republican Party around Donald Trump.
with Jack Hibbs
Bitcoin hit a two-year high on Tuesday, on track for its biggest two-day rally this year.
February 27, 2024 – 3:08 AM PST (Reuters) – Buoyed by the successful launch of U.S. bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), asset managers are lining…
Streaming subscriber growth in the U.S. is showing signs that the boom might be over for the industry.
Microsoft announced principles to foster innovation and competition as a market leader in AI.
rnrn
What evidence, if any, has Bradley presented that supports the claim of a personal relationship between Willis and Wade?
Required to reveal any evidence or information that supports the claim of a personal relationship between Willis and Wade and whether it had any financial implications. If Bradley can provide evidence that the relationship existed prior to Wade’s involvement in the case, it could potentially undermine the arguments made by Willis and Wade regarding the lack of a conflict of interest.
The disqualification of Willis and Wade from the case is a crucial aspect being pursued by Michael Roman and other co-defendants of former President Donald Trump. They argue that Willis had a financial interest in the case due to her alleged relationship with Wade, making her impartiality questionable. This underscores the importance of transparency and fairness in the legal system.
It is worth noting that both Willis and Wade acknowledge their personal relationship, but they have consistently maintained that it did not involve any financial benefits for Willis. They contend that their relationship does not pose a conflict of interest that would disqualify them from the case. However, the defense team asserts that Bradley possesses evidence contradicting these claims, suggesting that there might be more at play than initially disclosed.
During a previous court hearing on February 15th, Bradley invoked attorney-client privilege when asked about the relationship, refusing to provide a direct answer. However, with his expected return to the witness stand, there is anticipation that Bradley might reveal significant information that sheds light on the alleged personal relationship and its potential impact on the case.
The outcome of Bradley’s testimony could have significant implications for the election case against Trump. If evidence of a pre-existing relationship between Willis and Wade is presented, it could weaken the credibility of their defenses and bolster the arguments for disqualification and dropping of charges. Conversely, if Bradley fails to produce substantial evidence, it may bolster the claims made by Willis and Wade regarding the absence of a conflict of interest.
As this high-profile case unfolds, it is vital to uphold the principles of fairness, transparency, and impartiality in the legal process. The examination of Bradley’s testimony will provide a clearer understanding of the alleged personal relationship and its potential influence on the case. It is imperative that all parties involved, including the defense, prosecution, and the court, assess this information objectively and without bias to ensure justice is served.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...