National Republican Club hosts authors critical of Israel
Capitol Hill Club to Host Controversial Authors Max Blumenthal and Miko Peled
L: Miko Peled (EPIC MASJID/YouTube) R: Max Blumenthal (Katie Halper/YouTube)
The Capitol Hill Club, a private Republican club in Washington, D.C., whose membership roster includes every Republican in Congress, is set to host an event featuring authors who have been critical of Israel and claim that the “Israel lobby” controls the government.
The event, titled “Where is the War in Gaza Going?”, will take place on Tuesday night and will showcase Max Blumenthal, a writer known for comparing Israel to Nazi Germany, and Miko Peled, an anti-Israel activist who has criticized “spheres of Jewish influence here in the U.S.”
According to the invitation, the speakers will provide “unique first-hand knowledge” of the “Israeli lobby and congressional cravenness.”
Blumenthal and Peled will also expose the alleged censorship that has silenced Palestinian viewpoints in the media, overshadowed by what they claim is Israeli propaganda.
The event’s sponsor from the Capitol Hill Club remains undisclosed. The club’s members include lobbyists, campaign staffers, political consultants, and lawmakers.
The event is organized by the Committee for the Republic, a group that hosts monthly speakers on challenges to the American Republic, including the military-industrial complex. Notably, the group’s board includes former Republican officials who are critical of Israel, such as ex-ambassador to Saudi Arabia Chas Freeman.
The Capitol Hill Club has declined to comment on the event.
Blumenthal, the son of former Clinton advisor Sidney Blumenthal, has a history of anti-Israel activism and has been associated with anti-American dictators. He has made controversial claims, including blaming the Israeli military for massacres of Israeli civilians and likening the Jewish state to Nazi Germany. His views have drawn criticism even from left-wing activists and publications.
Peled has also made controversial statements, referring to Israel as a “terrorist state” and an “apartheid regime.”
To what extent should the principles of freedom of speech and intellectual diversity outweigh concerns about providing a platform for authors who spread misinformation and promote controversial views about Israel
Ludes prominent politicians, journalists, and business leaders, has come under fire for its decision to host controversial authors Max Blumenthal and Miko Peled. Blumenthal and Peled are known for their strong criticisms of Israel and their support for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.
The decision to invite Blumenthal and Peled to speak at the Capitol Hill Club has sparked outrage among pro-Israel activists and lawmakers. Critics argue that hosting authors who promote anti-Israel sentiment goes against the long-standing bipartisan support for the U.S.-Israel relationship. They claim that it is inappropriate for a club with strong ties to the Republican Party to provide a platform for authors who propagate controversial views on a key ally.
Max Blumenthal, the editor of the left-wing publication The Grayzone, has been accused of spreading misinformation and biased reporting about Israel. He has been a vocal critic of Israel’s policies and has been accused of promoting anti-Semitism through his writings. Similarly, Miko Peled, an Israeli-American author, has been criticized for his controversial views on Israel, including claims that Zionism is akin to apartheid and that the Jewish state should be dismantled.
The event, titled “Can Pro-Israel Also Be Pro-Peace?”, has drawn criticism for its misleading title. Critics argue that it gives a platform to authors who are not interested in a balanced discussion but rather seek to undermine and discredit Israel. They claim that inviting authors with such extreme views only serves to fuel anti-Israel sentiment and create further divisions.
Supporters of Blumenthal and Peled argue that the event is an opportunity to hear alternative perspectives on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They argue that it is important to have open, honest discussions that challenge mainstream narratives and that authors like Blumenthal and Peled offer valuable insights that are often marginalized in mainstream discourse. They claim that stifling alternative viewpoints goes against the principles of freedom of speech and intellectual diversity.
The controversy surrounding the Capitol Hill Club’s decision to host Blumenthal and Peled highlights the ongoing debate around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of free speech in fostering dialogue. While some argue that providing a platform for controversial authors is a necessary part of democratic discourse, others believe that it undermines the bipartisan support for Israel and promotes harmful narratives. Ultimately, it is up to individual organizations and institutions to determine where they draw the line between promoting diverse perspectives and legitimizing harmful ideologies.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...