National Review’s baseless attack on Heritage Foundation is cowardly.
The Heritage Foundation is once again facing criticism for not aligning with the desires of establishment neocons when it comes to U.S. funding for Ukraine. This time, the think tank is under fire for the outrageous offense of being quoted in Russian media.
According to National Review’s Jim Geraghty, if America’s adversaries quote critics of the Biden administration, it automatically means those critics are wrong and their objections can be dismissed. In a recent column, Geraghty dedicated his time to making this absurd argument.
Here’s the background. In August, Heritage argued that the federal government should prioritize assisting Americans affected by natural disasters rather than funding the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. Heritage President Kevin Roberts wrote an op-ed criticizing the Biden administration’s attempt to sneak more Ukraine funding into a bill for disaster relief. Heritage also released a video stating that until Joe Biden presents a plan to end the war, Congress should not approve additional funding. These views are shared by a significant portion of Americans, as shown by a recent Gallup poll.
What really upset the establishment types, particularly at National Review, was Heritage’s mention that the total U.S. funding for Ukraine amounts to about $900 per American household. They launched a series of articles attempting to debunk this figure and downplay its significance.
In a recent article, Geraghty found a new reason to complain. He claimed that Heritage’s $900 talking point has been frequently quoted by Russian state media and Putin’s allies. However, being quoted by bad actors does not invalidate an argument. Geraghty’s assertion that being quoted by Russian state media means Heritage has strayed into giving Putin’s regime useful fodder is baseless.
Ironically, Geraghty himself has been quoted multiple times by the state-run Russian television news network RT. RT has also quoted or amplified National Review’s criticism of Biden and the Democrats numerous times. This proves nothing, just as the Russian media quoting Heritage proves nothing.
Geraghty’s guilt-by-association smear is a dishonest tactic to avoid engaging with the substance of Heritage’s argument. The debate is not about whether to oppose Putin, but whether funding a proxy war against Moscow through Ukraine is a wise use of limited resources without a clear strategy. Geraghty avoids this debate because he has nothing substantive to contribute.
If Geraghty wants to take a shower over something, it should be over his own cowardly tactics. Resorting to guilt by association is a disingenuous way to denigrate his opponents at Heritage. If I ever stooped to such tactics, I would hope someone would tell me to quit the writing business altogether.
rnrn
What concerns do many Americans share regarding the allocation of funding for Ukraine, and how should the Biden administration address these concerns
The fact that there is a growing opposition to continued funding for Ukraine.
However, this did not sit well with establishment neocons who advocate for increased funding to Ukraine in order to counter Russia. They believe that any criticism or skepticism towards providing more funds automatically aligns with America’s adversaries. This is a flawed and simplistic way of viewing the matter.
Jim Geraghty, in his recent column for National Review, argues that if Russia quotes critics of the Biden administration, then these critics must be dismissed and their objections invalidated. This is an absurd argument that undermines the importance of critical thinking and independent analysis.
The Heritage Foundation, being quoted in Russian media, does not diminish the validity of their arguments. It is crucial to recognize that Russian media often has its own agenda and is not a reliable source of information. The fact that Heritage’s views are being mentioned in Russian media does not make them wrong or irrelevant.
The argument put forth by Heritage is that the federal government should prioritize assistance for Americans affected by natural disasters rather than allocating funds to the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia. This is a valid point that deserves thoughtful consideration. It is not about being against Ukraine or favoring Russia, but rather about prioritizing the needs of American citizens.
Heritage President Kevin Roberts wrote an op-ed criticizing the Biden administration’s attempt to sneak more Ukraine funding into a bill for disaster relief. This is a concern shared by many Americans who believe that funding should be allocated appropriately and transparently. It is necessary for the Biden administration to present a clear plan to end the war before additional funding is approved.
It is important to note that these views are not isolated or extreme. A significant portion of Americans shares these concerns and believes that there should be a careful evaluation of the effectiveness of the funding provided to Ukraine.
Criticism and diverse viewpoints are essential for a healthy and robust democracy. Dismissing critics simply because they are quoted in Russian media is a dangerous trend that stifles open dialogue and intellectual discourse.
Instead of attacking the messenger, it is crucial to address the substance of the arguments put forth by the Heritage Foundation and other critics. Engaging in a thoughtful and informed debate will lead to better policy decisions and ultimately benefit the American people.
In conclusion, the Heritage Foundation is once again facing criticism for not aligning with the desires of establishment neocons when it comes to U.S. funding for Ukraine. However, being quoted in Russian media does not invalidate their arguments. It is essential to objectively evaluate the merits of their viewpoint and engage in meaningful debate rather than dismissing critics based on their perceived associations.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...