The epoch times

NH Secretary of State addresses Trump’s 14th Amendment challenge.

New ⁣Hampshire Secretary of State: No Legal Basis ​to ‌Keep Trump off 2024 Primary Ballot

New‌ Hampshire Secretary of State ​David Scanlan stated on Wednesday that there is ⁤no legal ⁣basis to disqualify former⁢ President ⁢Donald​ Trump from the 2024 primary ballot as he seeks‌ reelection,‍ based⁤ on the 14th⁤ Amendment.

“There is no mention in the New ‍Hampshire state statute that a candidate in a New Hampshire presidential primary can ‍be disqualified⁢ using the 14th‍ Amendment ⁢of the United States Constitution mentioning insurrection or rebellion,” he told news outlets‍ in a statement. “There ​is‌ nothing in⁣ the 14th Amendment that suggests ‍that exercising the provisions of ⁣that amendment ⁢should ‌take place ⁤during ⁤the delegate selection process held by the different states.”

The 14th ⁣Amendment, ratified after the Civil War, ​gave ‌equal protection under the law to ⁢all persons ⁤born or naturalized‌ in the⁣ United States. It added​ a section that⁤ allowed the federal government ⁤to ‌punish states that infringed on a ‌citizen’s right to vote, ⁣and a third section that ‍disqualified those⁤ who participated in the rebellion or insurrection against the nation​ to ⁣hold office, unless two-thirds of Congress made ⁢such an exception for​ the candidate.

Mr. Scanlan emphasized that‌ “nothing in our state statute​ gives the ⁤secretary of⁣ state the discretion ‍to entertain qualification issues ‍once a candidate swears under ⁤the penalty of perjury ​that they meet the qualifications to be president.” He added that once the ⁣candidate applies according to the proper procedures, their name “will appear on the ballot.”

He further expressed concerns ⁣about ⁣the potential chaos and confusion if some states disqualify a candidate while others allow ⁤their name on the ‌ballot, ‌stating, ‍”there’s going to be chaos, confusion, ⁣anger, and frustration.”

Mr.​ Scanlan clarified that the U.S. Supreme Court is the only​ authority that can make a determination on this matter, and any constitutional disqualification would have to apply “across the board” ⁤in⁣ all 50 states or not ⁤at all.

“At a time‍ when⁤ we need U.S.⁤ election officials to‍ ensure transparency and build confidence among voters around ​the country, the delegate selection process should not be the battleground to test ⁣this constitutional question,” he added.

New Hampshire GOP Chairman ⁣Chris Ager‌ told Fox News that ‌he considered the ⁣14th Amendment arguments “a complete waste of time”⁢ and that the party would ‌have intervened in any ⁤legal action⁢ brought ‌forth in the ​state.

“I’m ‌glad that we’ve put it to bed here in⁤ New Hampshire,”‌ he ‍ said.
Liberal groups have been trying to drum up ⁤support for the idea of ​ barring President Trump from reelection,⁢ arguing that his actions on⁤ Jan.‌ 6, 2021, constituted an insurrection ⁣or rebellion, which ⁢under the post-Civil⁣ War amendment would disqualify someone from holding office.

But secretaries ‍of state have not warmed to the idea, arguing this⁢ is not within their ⁣jurisdiction.

Late August, Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes said he could not remove ⁣President Trump’s name ‌from the ⁣ballot under state law, while also calling the law “stupid” because of its broad coverage.
Last week, Minnesota‌ Secretary​ of State Steve Simon similarly said on‍ NPR that‌ this⁣ was also not⁢ something he had the ‌authority to do, saying the ⁢state⁣ law⁢ instead allows ⁣”any individual” to bring ⁢forth a petition, after which ⁢a judge could rule ‍to strike a candidate from the ballot. Four days‍ later, a⁢ liberal group filed such a suit.
Earlier, such a petition was thrown out in Florida after an⁣ Obama-appointed judge said she lacked jurisdiction.
In Colorado, a petition is still pending. Meanwhile, legal experts are arguing for both sides​ of ‌the issue.

Debate in New Hampshire

In recent days,​ arguments over disqualifying President Trump ​in the early ‌primary state reached new heights.

A‌ New Hampshire attorney, Bryant Messner, had⁣ brought the idea ‌to Mr. Scanlan last ​month, leading to politicians voicing their​ support for or against ‍the ⁢idea. ⁤Mr. Scanlan maintained that it was a decision for the courts, ⁢but​ by​ Tuesday, Sept. 12, the Trump Campaign sent a letter ⁤to his office signed by 81 New Hampshire state officials and former U.S. Senator Bob Smith.

“There is no legal ‌basis for these claims to hold ​up in any ⁢legitimate court of law,” they wrote. “The opinions of those perpetuating this fraud against the will of⁢ the people are nothing more than a ⁤blatant attempt to affront democracy and disenfranchise⁢ all voters and⁣ the former President.”
They dismissed the 14th Amendment strategy as a political attack and “absurd conspiracy theory,” urging New Hampshire to live ⁤up to​ its historic‍ patriotism by invoking the ⁣1776 revolution.

‘Dangerous’ Precedent

The groups arguing that President Trump‍ participated in an “insurrection” point



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker