The epoch times

US-China Tech Investment Ban Shows Promise, but Progress is Slow: Experts

President Biden’s Executive Order Signals Potential Change in US-China Competition

According to experts, President Joe Biden’s recent Executive Order calling for the ban ​of ⁢certain investments in China’s tech sector could mark the beginning of significant change in the competition between the United States and China.

Eric Sayers, ⁣a nonresident fellow ​at the American Enterprise Institute think tank, believes ‌that it will take about a year for the administration to⁣ refine and ⁣implement the rules regarding investments in China’s artificial intelligence, ​quantum, and semiconductor ​sectors.

“The ‍pessimistic way to ‌look at this is the administration spent a year briefing everyone, consulting on this process, only to start a new consulting clock here,” Mr. Sayers said during an Aug.‌ 11 talk at the Center⁢ for a New American Security.

Despite the lengthy process, ‍Mr. Sayers sees this ‌as‍ a ‍positive step, as ‌it demonstrates an “expanded willingness” by the executive branch to prioritize finance ⁤and technology flows for the sake of national security.

Looking⁣ ahead, Mr. Sayers remains hopeful that the ​coming year will initiate an “iterative” process that will‌ lead to a resilient policy over the course of years and even decades.

Biden Order Targets Critical Technologies

President Biden’s executive​ order, signed on Aug. 9, declares a national emergency in response to the “unusual and extraordinary threat” posed by countries using U.S. investments ⁢to advance their military and intelligence capabilities.

The order ‍grants the Secretary​ of the Treasury the authority to prohibit investments in artificial intelligence (AI), quantum information technology, and semiconductor and microelectronics​ manufacturing if they​ are deemed to benefit a nation’s military modernization.

The Treasury has also released proposed rules and is ⁣seeking public comment on their implementation, which⁢ will undergo a ‌lengthy comment⁢ period before being formally‍ adopted within the‍ next ⁢year.

There ⁣has already been​ some debate‌ about the efficacy of the proposed​ rules and the potential for them to be watered down during the ⁤comment period. Additionally, the order’s‍ limited approach is likely to face criticism from both sides of​ the China debate, with some advocating for greater decoupling and others seeking more engagement.

Peter Harrell, a nonresident fellow at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,⁣ explains that the discussion around targeting⁤ outbound investments into China has been ongoing since 2018, when the ⁤Trump administration imposed⁣ tariffs in response⁤ to intellectual ​property ‌theft.

Mr. Harrell also notes that while the investment bans have a narrow scope, the requirements for federal notification ‌of certain ‌investments are broad. This ⁣will allow the government⁣ to gain a more comprehensive understanding of outbound U.S. investment flows.

Sarah Bauerle‌ Danzman, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank, believes that the​ proposed ⁢rules align the U.S.’ strategic‍ posture with those recognized by partners and‍ allies, ​paving the way for a more unified response to China.

US‍ Investments and Technology’s Impact on China’s Military

The rules ⁢will focus ⁤on preventing U.S. private equity and venture capital from flowing to Chinese entities that could enhance the regime’s military capabilities.

For years, U.S. tech companies and venture capital firms have⁣ invested in entities associated ⁣with the military wing⁤ of⁢ the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with little interference from the federal government.

In response, the ‍bipartisan House Select Committee on ​the CCP is launching investigations into several U.S. venture capital firms accused of funding China’s AI development and military modernization.

The regime’s theft of critical technologies, including those obtained from ⁤the United States, further underscores the need for ⁤measures to⁤ address this issue.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker