New York Man Charged After Trying To Help Woman Being Robbed By Homeless Man In Subway: Police
A Heroic Act in New York City Subway Station
A man in New York City has been charged with reckless endangerment after he bravely stepped in to help a woman who was being robbed at a subway station by a homeless man and fired several shots, according to police.
John Rote, 43, was charged with criminal possession of a firearm, criminal possession of a weapon, reckless endangerment, and menacing after he allegedly fired two shots in the direction of a mugger who had accosted a woman at 10:00 p.m. Tuesday night at a subway station in Manhattan, according to the New York Times.
New York officials strongly criticized Rote, condemning his actions as unacceptable.
“I want to be clear: we don’t tolerate this kind of conduct in NYC Transit, period,” said NYC Transit President Richard Davey. “Once again cameras recorded a perpetrator, and we are grateful the NYPD made an arrest within hours. Thank goodness nobody was hurt here – but what occurred was outrageous, reckless, and unacceptable.”
NEW: New York man John Rote has been arrested after he saved a woman from getting robbed by a homeless man in a Manhattan subway station.
The current state of New York City.
On Tuesday evening, Rote noticed that a woman was getting robbed and immediately jumped into action. The… pic.twitter.com/1vbhjowNpl
— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) November 9, 2023
Matthew Roesch, 49, allegedly accosted a woman while he was holding open an emergency gate. Police say that he then tried to take her purse which was when “another customer pulled out a gun and tried to intervene,” according to Davey.
“Roesch demands a dollar for letting her enter the subway illegally,” said NYPD Chief of Detectives Joseph Kenny. “Mr. Roesch begins to follow her, demanding money. She won’t give it to him. He says, ‘Give me a dollar, or I’m going to take your purse.’”
Rote then courageously told Roesch to “leave her alone” before firing a shot at Roesch’s feet, according to Kenny. Police say Rote told them that he threw his gun into the East River after the incident.
“He was concerned, asking if he hurt anybody,” said Kenny. “It was just an impulsive thing to do. He’s just stepping in, he thought he was trying to help this woman.”
Roesch now faces attempted robbery charges and was released under court-ordered supervision while Rote was held on $10,000 bail.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
According to NYPD Inspector Steven Hill, Roesch is known to pressure commuters to give him money and has been a “constant problem.”
One man who knows Rote told the New York Daily News that he is “a decent guy … He seems very mild-mannered. I don’t know whether he’s going to lose his job, but me personally, I think he shouldn’t. I think the [woman] should be thankful.”
The case echoes another incident from the New York City subway where former Marine Daniel Penny was charged after he restrained a homeless man on a subway who passengers say was acting erratically and threatening violence. The homeless man died and Penny faces charges of second-degree manslaughter and negligent homicide.
How do the charges against Rote raise questions about the concept of self-defense and the right to intervene in dangerous situations?
The heroic act took place on Tuesday evening in a subway station in Manhattan, where John Rote noticed a woman being robbed by a homeless man. Rote immediately sprang into action and fired two shots in the direction of the mugger, effectively scaring him off and saving the woman from harm. However, instead of being hailed as a hero, Rote was charged with criminal offenses.
The reaction from New York officials has been strongly critical of Rote’s actions, deeming them as unacceptable. NYC Transit President Richard Davey expressed his disapproval, stating, “we don’t tolerate this kind of conduct in NYC Transit, period.” He also praised the NYPD for their swift response and arrest, reaffirming that such reckless behavior would not be tolerated.
However, it is crucial to examine the events leading up to Rote’s intervention. The mugger, identified as Matthew Roesch, had accosted the woman while holding open an emergency gate and demanding money. When Roesch tried to take the woman’s purse, it was then that Rote, seeing the danger and feeling compelled to help, pulled out his gun and intervened, effectively scaring off the mugger.
It is unfortunate that Rote now faces charges for his actions, as he stepped in to protect a fellow citizen when she was in imminent danger. While it is true that firing a weapon in a public area poses risks, it is essential to consider the circumstances under which Rote made his decision. Rote’s intentions were to protect and prevent harm, and in that moment of crisis, he made a split-second decision to take action.
The incident raises questions about the concept of self-defense and the right to intervene in situations where others are in danger. While the use of firearms should be subject to legal restrictions and regulations, it is crucial to recognize the bravery and courage displayed by Rote in this particular circumstance. His actions highlight the fine line between citizen intervention and vigilantism, raising important discussions about the balance between personal responsibility and public safety.
As this case unfolds, it remains to be seen what legal consequences Rote may face. However, it is equally important to examine this incident as an opportunity to reassess existing policies and attitudes towards citizen intervention in dangerous situations. While the actions of John Rote may have been unconventional, they undoubtedly resulted in the protection of a vulnerable individual.
As a society, it is crucial to foster a safe environment where citizens can come to each other’s aid without fear of retribution. Brave acts like Rote’s should be acknowledged and celebrated, rather than met with criticism and legal actions. It is through these acts of heroism that we can create a culture that values the protection and well-being of all individuals.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...