NY Times panics as Trump’s victory looms

The New York Times’ Trump Derangement Syndrome

The New York Times is once again succumbing to Trump Derangement Syndrome, as evidenced by their⁢ outlandish ⁢claims about a potential‌ second term for‍ Donald Trump. Recent polls ⁢have shown Trump leading President Joe Biden in crucial swing states, causing panic among liberal media outlets.

In a ⁣lengthy article written by three ⁣of the paper’s top ‌political ⁣reporters, the Times rehashes the ⁢same complaints about ‌Trump’s first term in ⁣office. They even go ‍as far ‍as quoting a throwaway line ⁣from a 1989 interview to argue that Trump ‍has totalitarian tendencies.

But let’s not forget that during his presidency, Trump took strong actions against⁤ Russia, China, and North Korea. He imposed sanctions, tariffs, and spoke out against ‌dictators. Under his ​leadership, there‍ were⁤ no new wars, the Iranian​ government was brought to its knees, and the Islamic State group was obliterated.

On the other hand, President Biden ​has been⁢ soft on⁢ these dictatorial regimes, allowing them to grow⁤ in ⁣power. The record ⁣is clear that Trump was much more forceful toward​ America’s authoritarian foes than his successor has been.

And let’s not ⁤ignore ⁣the hypocrisy of the Times.⁢ They claim that Trump’s vow to use the ‍Justice Department against his adversaries ⁣challenges democratic values, ⁢but conveniently forget the actions of the Biden administration. The Obama-Biden DOJ⁤ launched an investigation into Trump’s 2016 campaign, and now Biden’s⁤ DOJ is trying⁣ to put the⁤ former ⁤president​ away for the rest of his life.

The Biden⁢ administration​ has also tried ⁣to equate the Jan. 6 Capitol incident with the Confederacy, but the ‍truth ⁤is that no shots⁢ were fired‌ and it was far from an insurrection. Most of the protesters ‌were peacefully exercising their⁣ right ‍to free speech, as Trump had encouraged them‌ to do.

Despite all this, the ‍Biden DOJ has launched an unprecedented investigation into the incident, arresting and charging over 1,000 ​protesters. This is​ a ‍clear challenge to democratic values.

It’s clear that ⁣the New York⁢ Times is once again ‌letting their bias cloud their⁢ judgment. Their ⁤fearmongering and ‍distorted narrative only serve to further divide the country.

Intimidation and Persecution: The Double Standard of the DOJ

Let’s call‌ it what ⁤it really is: intimidation and ‌persecution of ⁢political opponents. The New York Times recently published an article expressing panic over the ​potential victory of former President Trump in the next election. But their claims are nothing more than Democratic propaganda.

The ​article highlights⁤ the actions of‍ the Department of ‌Justice (DOJ) under both Trump and Biden. It’s clear that⁤ Biden’s DOJ has ⁢shown a ⁣tendency to target political​ foes, while Trump’s DOJ did not engage in​ such behavior.

A Tale‍ of ‌Two Protests

The article compares the response of the DOJ to ⁣two different protests: the “Disrupt‍ J20” protests during Trump’s Inauguration Day in 2017 and the “social justice” demonstrations in the summer of ‌2020.

During ⁢Trump’s inauguration, violence erupted​ on the streets of Washington, D.C. with people smashing car and‍ store‌ windows, clashing with⁢ police, and even‌ torching a​ limo. ⁣More than 200 arrests‌ were made. However, the DOJ later​ dropped ⁤all charges⁢ against those⁢ who engaged in violence, without even requiring community service.

In ​contrast, the DOJ’s response to the 2020 protests was different. Secret Service agents had to rush then-President ‍Trump to a bunker when rioters broke ‍through the outer security barriers at the White House. Many agents were injured, and property was vandalized. Yet, only 17 people were arrested, most of⁤ whom were charged with rioting. And even ​then, ⁣the charges were dropped by ‌prosecutors in​ most cases.

The Double Standard

It’s⁢ clear⁤ that⁢ there is a double standard⁢ when it comes to the DOJ’s treatment⁢ of political opponents. Trump’s ⁢DOJ did not engage in a massive round-up of protesters or target political foes. But Biden’s DOJ seems to have no⁤ problem with intimidation and persecution.

The article concludes by stating that if Trump were to clean house⁤ in the⁢ DOJ, no one would be able to rightfully‌ criticize ⁤him. Freedom and opportunity were the touchstones of Trump’s⁢ first term, and there is no reason⁤ to believe the ‌same‌ would not be true in a second.

Source: The Western Journal

In⁤ what ways does the article conveniently ‌forget the actions of the Biden administration and the Obama-Biden DOJ, and ⁢how ‌does it ⁤demonstrate a clear double standard ‌when​ critiquing Trump’s alleged threat to ⁢use the Justice Department ⁣against his adversaries

E Times’⁢ allegations of Trump’s totalitarian tendencies, ​citing a⁤ random remark from a 1989 interview. It conveniently⁣ ignores the strong actions that Trump ‌took against authoritarian regimes during​ his⁢ presidency.

Under Trump’s leadership, there⁢ were⁤ no new wars, and⁣ he successfully dealt with the⁤ Iranian government and ‌the Islamic ‍State group. His sanctions, tariffs, and ⁣tough stance against Russia, China, and North Korea sent ⁤a clear message‌ that‍ America would​ not tolerate‍ the‍ actions of dictators.

In contrast, President Biden has⁤ taken a softer approach towards ⁤these regimes, allowing them ​to gain power and ⁣influence. The Times fails ⁣to acknowledge this stark difference in their piece.

The article also criticizes ⁤Trump’s alleged threat ​to use⁢ the Justice‍ Department ‌against his ‌adversaries, claiming that it challenges democratic⁢ values. However, it conveniently forgets the actions of the‌ Biden ‌administration and the Obama-Biden DOJ. The investigation into Trump’s 2016 campaign and the current attempt ‌to prosecute him by ⁣the Biden DOJ demonstrate a clear double standard.

Additionally, the‍ Biden administration has tried to equate the Jan. 6 Capitol incident with the Confederacy, despite the fact ‍that no shots were fired⁣ and it was far from an insurrection. ‌Most⁢ of the ‍protesters ⁣were peacefully exercising their⁢ right to free⁤ speech, as encouraged by Trump. Yet, the Biden DOJ‍ has launched an unprecedented investigation ‌into the incident, arresting and ​charging⁢ over 1,000 protesters, which poses ⁢a threat to democratic values.

It⁤ is evident that the‌ New York Times is allowing its bias to cloud⁤ its ‍judgment once again. ⁤The fearmongering and distorted narrative they present only serve to further divide ​the‍ country. Their ⁤claims of Trump’s potential ⁤second ⁣term being a threat to democracy‍ are nothing more​ than an attempt to ⁢intimidate and⁤ persecute their political opponents.

It is⁣ crucial to recognize ⁢this double standard and question the motives of media outlets that succumb to such biases. ⁢As citizens, we must⁣ seek the truth and look beyond partisan narratives to make‌ informed‌ decisions about⁣ our​ leaders and ⁣the issues that affect our nation.