The epoch times

Newsom rejects bill mandating schools to provide condoms to high school students.

California Governor Vetoes Bill Requiring ⁣Schools to Provide ‌Free Condoms to Students

California Governor Gavin ⁤Newsom⁣ made the decision to veto a bill on⁣ October 8th ⁣that​ would have mandated⁤ schools to ​offer free condoms to middle and high school ​students. ‍In his veto message, Newsom cited the state’s current $30​ billion⁣ deficit as the reason for his decision, stating that implementing the⁣ bill would be too⁢ costly for the already financially burdened ⁤state.

“This bill would create ‌an unfunded mandate to public‍ schools that should be⁤ considered in the ⁤annual budget⁤ process,” Mr. Newsom​ wrote in the letter.

Related Stories

Legislators estimated that ⁤the bill would have‍ cost⁣ the state several million dollars annually. The ⁢proposed legislation would⁤ have required all public schools to provide both internal and external condoms to students in grades 7–12 ⁢free of charge, while also ensuring that students were ⁢aware⁣ of their availability.

In ⁣addition,​ the bill aimed to prohibit‌ retailers from denying ⁤the sale​ of⁢ contraception based on age⁢ and from⁤ requiring identification⁣ for purchase.

State‍ Senator Caroline Menjivar, ​who‌ introduced the bill, emphasized that its purpose was to prevent unwanted pregnancies and the spread of‌ sexually ‍transmitted infections among⁤ young people. ‍During a hearing in⁢ the Senate⁢ Education ⁢Committee,⁤ Menjivar ​expressed her‍ hope that the bill would promote safe sexual habits for teenagers.

“While⁢ abstinence is, as we know, the only 100 percent effective way to prevent a sexually transmitted infection, we‌ know some teens are still engaging in sexual activity,” she said. “We want to​ make sure when that teenager‌ makes that personal decision, they have‍ the ‍resources to stay⁣ safe.”

Menjivar also highlighted the barriers that ‍teenagers often face when trying to access condoms, such as cost,​ availability, age restrictions, and the potential for embarrassment when ​purchasing them.

“Youth are ⁢often ⁤denied and turned away [when purchasing condoms], and it’s not deterring them from engaging⁣ in sexual behavior, it’s just ​promoting unsafe sexual behavior,” she⁣ said. “Providing condoms in school ensures we are‍ meeting ⁣youth where they are at.”

During the hearing, representatives from various health and ⁤youth advocacy​ organizations ‍voiced their ⁤support for the bill, ⁣including members of the AIDs ⁢Healthcare Foundation, the California Coalition ​for ⁤Youth, the California Federation ‌of Teachers,⁣ and the ​California Teachers Association.

However,⁤ there were also opposing views⁣ expressed. ‍Greg Burt,‍ from the California Family Council, argued that the state’s emphasis on condoms‍ in recent years had inadvertently⁤ led to an increase in ​sexually transmitted infections among young people.

“For the last decade or more, this legislative ‍body has⁤ been pushing condoms as the solution to sexually transmitted infections spreading among our youth,” he said. “And each time the infection rate rose, [legislators] insisted⁤ kids just​ need easier access ​to ⁢condoms ​and information​ about safe sex⁣ at younger and ‍younger ages.”

Burt ⁤urged the‌ committee to ⁣reconsider the issue and instead ‍promote abstinence until marriage as the ⁣ideal approach ‌to sexual health.

“It is time to tell ‌young⁣ people the ‍truth, that those with the most fulfilling and healthy sex lives ‍are those who treat sex as a special and intimate act to be‍ shared in‌ a monogamous,‌ committed⁢ marriage,” he said.⁢ “I’m not encouraging you ‍to ‌shame ​people. But hold up abstinence‌ until marriage‌ as a noble ​ideal. Sexually⁣ transmitted infections can’t ⁣thrive in a culture that idealizes marriage.”

A opened locker at a high school ⁣in Calif., on July 28, 2020. (John Fredricks/The​ Epoch​ Times)

What are the arguments for providing free condoms in‍ schools to‍ promote‌ safer sexual practices and reduce rates of teenage pregnancies and sexually ​transmitted infections?

Rchasing condoms]⁢ because the person on the⁣ other side of the counter ⁢has made a judgment about their maturity level,” she​ explained.

Supporters of the bill argue⁣ that‍ providing free​ condoms⁤ in​ schools would not only promote safer sexual ⁣practices but also help reduce the rates of teenage pregnancies and‍‌ sexually transmitted infections. They point to studies that show a correlation between increased access to contraception and decreased ‌rates of unplanned pregnancies and STIs among young⁢ people.

Opponents of the bill, on the other hand, believe that it ⁤is not the responsibility of schools to provide⁢ condoms to students. They argue that ‌promoting abstinence should be the primary focus and that ⁣providing condoms may encourage sexual activity among ‍young people. Some also express concerns about the potential for condoms to ⁤be distributed inappropriately or used improperly.

Despite the veto, Newsom acknowledged the‍ importance of addressing sexual health education in schools. In⁢ his veto message, he stated that he looks forward to working with the bill’s author and other stakeholders ‍to find a solution that ensures students have the⁣ information and resources⁢ they need to make safe and healthy‍ choices.

California⁢ is not the only ⁣state‌ to consider or implement policies regarding the provision of condoms in schools. According to the Guttmacher Institute, as ⁤of April 2021, 29 states, including California, have ⁢laws or policies‍ that ​allow schools to provide condoms to‍ students. However, the specific provisions and requirements vary from state to state.

Despite the veto, the conversation surrounding sexual health education and access‍ to contraception in schools is likely to​ continue. Advocates and⁤ policymakers will continue to debate the best ways to ensure that young people have the knowledge and resources necessary to navigate their ​sexual health responsibly.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker