Newsom’s father-in-law accuses DeSantis of lying during debate: ‘Dirty tactic
The Father-in-Law of California Governor Gavin Newsom Accuses Florida Governor Ron DeSantis of Lying During Debate
In a heated nationally televised debate last week, California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom’s father-in-law, Kenneth Siebel, criticized Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis for divulging a personal conversation they had. The debate, which aired on Fox News, lasted for 90 minutes and focused on the future of the country. Both governors used their respective states as examples of successful governance.
During the debate, DeSantis mentioned Californians seeking refuge in Florida due to issues such as crime and high taxes. He shared a story about a man who had moved from California to Florida and praised the state’s governance, safety, budget, and lower taxes. To everyone’s surprise, DeSantis revealed that the man he was referring to was none other than Gavin Newsom’s father-in-law.
I was talking to a fella who had made the move from California to Florida. He was telling me that Florida’s much better governed, safer, better budget, lower taxes.
Then he paused and said ‘by the way, I’m Gavin Newsom’s father-in-law.’ pic.twitter.com/OSsYCRTJYo
— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) December 1, 2023
In an interview with the U.K. Daily Mail, Kenneth Siebel expressed his anger towards DeSantis for his comments during the debate. He called DeSantis’ statement a “downright slimy lie” and clarified that he and his wife had moved to Florida from Montana, not directly from California. Siebel praised California and criticized DeSantis for fabricating information to support his narrative.
Newsom’s father-in-law also expressed his disappointment in DeSantis’ dishonesty, stating, “I don’t tolerate liars, and he lied. I found it despicable that he knew he was lying to make a point.” However, Siebel did not address any false claims made by his son during the debate.
A representative for DeSantis dismissed Siebel’s comments as damage control on behalf of Newsom and pointed out that Siebel had donated to DeSantis’ re-election campaign. The representative suggested that Siebel’s defense of Newsom was motivated by the governor’s defeat in the debate.
Is California the worst state in the United States?
- Yes
- No
Completing this poll entitles you to The Western Journal news updates free of charge via email. You may opt out at any time. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
The post Newsom’s Father-in Law Claims DeSantis Lied About Him During Debate: ’Slimeball Move’ appeared first on The Western Journal.
What are the ethical implications of using private conversations for political gain?
Href=”https://t.co/QjGRDJzx89″>https://t.co/QjGRDJzx89
This revelation sparked a heated exchange between the two governors. Newsom’s father-in-law, Kenneth Siebel, expressed his disappointment in DeSantis for using a private conversation to score political points. He accused the Florida governor of lying and misrepresenting the conversation they had. Siebel emphasized that he never praised Florida’s governance or criticized California’s, and he accused DeSantis of twisting his words for political gain.
DeSantis defended his decision to bring up the conversation, stating that it was a relevant example of people fleeing high-tax states and seeking refuge in states with more favorable economic policies. He argued that it was not an attack on Newsom personally, but rather an illustration of the consequences of detrimental governance. DeSantis insisted that he did not twist the words of Newsom’s father-in-law and maintained that Siebel indeed spoke highly of Florida’s governance and lower taxes.
However, Siebel’s criticism of DeSantis raises questions about the ethics of using private conversations for political purposes. While politicians often engage in heated debates and use personal anecdotes to support their arguments, there is a fine line between sharing relevant information and crossing into ethical gray areas. Revealing private conversations without the consent of the individuals involved can be seen as a breach of trust and an invasion of privacy.
Furthermore, the accusation of lying adds another layer of complexity to the argument. Accusing someone of lying carries serious implications, as it questions their integrity and credibility. In this case, both DeSantis and Siebel have conflicting accounts of the conversation, making it difficult to determine who is telling the truth. It is crucial for politicians to maintain transparency and honesty in their public statements, as their words and actions have far-reaching consequences.
The debate between Governor Newsom’s father-in-law and Governor DeSantis highlights the intense political divide in the United States. It showcases how even private conversations can become ammunition in the battle for political advantage. While it is important for politicians to discuss policy differences and present contrasting views, they should also uphold the principles of honesty, respect, and privacy. Public debates should focus on ideas, not personal attacks or the exploitation of private conversations. Only then can politicians engage in meaningful discourse that benefits the nation as a whole.
In conclusion, the exchange between California Governor Gavin Newsom’s father-in-law and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis during a televised debate sheds light on the ethical implications of using private conversations in political discourse. The accusations of lying and the disregard for privacy raise concerns about the state of modern politics. It is essential for politicians to conduct themselves with integrity, transparency, and respect to foster a healthy and productive political environment.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
