Conservatives shouldn’t copy Richard Nixon
Reevaluating Nixon’s Legacy: A Lesson for Conservatives
Decades after his political handlers promised a “New Nixon,” some on the right are taking a closer look at the record of the 37th president. Recent articles in Politico and City Journal explore how 21st-century conservatives can learn from one of the most prominent Republicans of the 20th century.
However, these efforts fall short for one simple reason: Nixon’s “conservatism” was more about style than substance. While he projected a conservative image with his anti-communist stance and emphasis on law and order, Nixon’s domestic policies actually contributed to the growth of government power.
Big Government Ambitions
In his analysis, Christopher Rufo portrays Nixon as a counterrevolutionary who aimed to push back against the left’s advances. This included taming the national bureaucracy, dismantling radical groups, and challenging leftist dominance in the media and universities.
But Nixon’s failure to achieve his goals in these areas undermined his entire strategy. In reality, his governance aligned more with liberal tax-and-spend policies, as observed in a recent Wall Street Journal op-ed. Congress enacted fiscal stimulus packages, while the Federal Reserve implemented accommodative monetary policies, leading to inflationary consequences.
Expanding the Bureaucracy
Nixon’s expansion of federal authority and the permanent bureaucracy went beyond his ill-fated wage and price controls. His affirmative action policies and the creation of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission perpetuated identity politics. Additionally, his environmental regulations and the establishment of agencies like the EPA and OSHA allowed unelected bureaucrats to hinder economic growth in the name of “sustainability.”
Although Rufo mentions Nixon’s “New Federalism” plan, which aimed to devolve authority from Washington, most of the legislation enacted during his administration centralized power within the administrative state. Efforts to dismantle federal offices and defang the bureaucracy in his second term were ultimately unsuccessful due to the power accumulated in his first term.
Policies Matter
While Nixon may have rhetorically aligned himself with the working class and the “silent majority,” his domestic policies empowered the intellectual elites he claimed to disdain. This contradiction serves as a valuable lesson for conservatives: actions speak louder than words. To truly dismantle the administrative state, power in Washington itself must be dismantled.
In what ways did President Nixon’s administration demonstrate a disregard for privacy and limited government through government surveillance activities
Ions
One of the most glaring examples of Nixon’s expansion of government power was his establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1970. While it may seem odd to criticize an agency dedicated to protecting the environment, the creation of the EPA represents a significant growth in the federal bureaucracy. This move granted the government broad authority to regulate businesses and individuals in the name of environmental protection, leading to increased burdens on the economy and individual liberty. In addition to the EPA, Nixon also implemented wage and price controls in an effort to combat inflation. These controls were a clear departure from free-market principles, as they sought to artificially control prices rather than letting the market determine their value. While this may have been a politically popular move at the time, it ultimately proved to be ineffective and contributed to economic stagnation. Nixon’s economic policies were not the only area where his big government ambitions were evident. His administration also sought to expand government surveillance capabilities, culminating in the infamous Watergate scandal. The illegal wiretapping and surveillance activities conducted by Nixon’s operatives demonstrated a blatant disregard for the principles of privacy and limited government. So what can conservatives today learn from Nixon’s legacy? The lesson here is clear: style should not be mistaken for substance. It is not enough for a politician to adopt conservative rhetoric or present themselves as a champion of conservative values. True conservatism is defined by a commitment to limited government, individual liberty, and free markets. Conservatives must carefully evaluate the actions and policies of those who claim to share their ideals. Nixon’s presidency serves as a cautionary tale, reminding us to look beyond the surface level and critically assess whether a politician’s actions align with conservative principles. As we navigate the complex political landscape of the 21st century, it is crucial that conservatives remain vigilant in upholding these core principles. The temptation to compromise or support candidates who do not fully embrace conservative values may be tempting, but ultimately, it is the responsibility of conservatives to hold true to their principles and ensure a limited government that respects individual liberty and promotes free markets. Nixon’s legacy serves as a reminder that conservatism is more than just a label or a political strategy – it is a commitment to timeless principles. As conservatives reevaluate his presidency, they should heed the lessons of history and strive for leaders who truly embody conservative values. Only through a steadfast dedication to limited government, individual liberty, and free markets can conservatives achieve their goals and continue to shape the future of our nation.Lesson for Conservatives
Conclusion
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
