No, US shouldn’t pressure Israel for a Palestinian state
Engaging Paraphrase:
According to Senator Chris Murphy, the next Israeli government must lead the way towards establishing a Palestinian state in order to achieve long-term peace. However, there are alternative options to consider. Israel could tighten control over Palestinian autonomy until violence ceases and peaceful coexistence is achieved. This approach would require accepting historical outcomes and living harmoniously with neighbors.
While the current situation is distressing, creating a three-front Iran-backed terror state on Israel’s borders would only exacerbate the problem. No rational society would support such a suicidal policy, and a true ally would not pressure a friend into it.
Unfortunately, this is the destiny of a potential “Palestine” – an Islamic autocracy and likely a proxy of Iran. Senator Murphy may not be aware that when autonomy was granted to the Palestinian Authority in Gaza in 2005, it quickly lost control. It is highly probable that Hamas or other extremist groups would take over a Palestinian state again. In such a scenario, would Murphy advocate for sending American troops to Gaza? Israel, compelled to respond to inevitable provocations from this newly formed nation, would likely engage in a deadlier war than the current conflict.
Furthermore, it is important to acknowledge that Hamas, despite not being universally popular among Palestinians, still garners significant support. Most polls indicate that Hamas is favored over other factions. This reality has prevented elections in the West Bank for over a decade, as Hamas would easily win.
Palestinian culture has a deep-rooted animosity towards Jews, which has fueled waves of extremism and violence throughout history. However, Palestinians and their supporters are the only ones who believe they can rewrite history every time they lose a war of aggression. Their claim to a state is based on the false narrative that Israel invaded and occupied the West Bank and Gaza, when in reality, these territories were acquired in defensive wars against Egypt and Jordan.
Setting aside historical context, there is no evidence to suggest that Palestinian self-governance would lead to peace. On the contrary, it often results in disappointment and violence when negotiations are dictated by those who adhere to flawed thinking. It is worth noting that those who criticize Israel for alleged democratic shortcomings do not hold Palestinian leaders accountable for their tyrannical rule in the West Bank and Gaza.
Fortunately, the creation of a Palestinian state cannot be forced by biased media or resolution-happy tyrants at the United Nations. Just as there is no independent Hungarian nation in Transylvania or a Republic of Basque, there may never be a second Palestine. While the current situation may seem intractable, it is crucial not to worsen it.
What are the responsibilities of both the Israelis and Palestinians in achieving long-term peace?
Hamas, a terrorist organization, took over and has been using Gaza as a launching pad for attacks against Israel ever since. Granting further autonomy to the Palestinians without ensuring their commitment to peace and stability would likely result in a similar outcome.
Furthermore, the idea that Israel should be solely responsible for creating a Palestinian state is unfair and ignores the actions and responsibilities of the Palestinians themselves. In order to achieve long-term peace, both sides must be held accountable for their actions and work towards a mutually beneficial solution.
Israel has shown its willingness to negotiate and make concessions for peace. It has made numerous offers for a two-state solution, only to be met with rejection and violence from the Palestinian side. To expect Israel to continue making unilateral concessions without any guarantees of peace or security is unreasonable.
The focus should not be solely on creating a Palestinian state, but on fostering an environment of trust, understanding, and cooperation between Israelis and Palestinians. This can only be achieved through meaningful negotiations, comprehensive security measures, and addressing the root causes of the conflict.
It is important for international actors, like Senator Murphy, to consider the complexities and challenges of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict before making simplistic and one-sided statements. A lasting and just peace cannot be achieved through one-sided pressure or by dictating the terms to one party.
Instead of pressuring Israel to create a Palestinian state, efforts should be directed towards encouraging both Israelis and Palestinians to engage in constructive dialogue and find common ground. This includes addressing issues such as security, borders, refugees, and Jerusalem in a fair and balanced manner.
Only through mutual recognition, respect, and compromise can a lasting and sustainable peace be achieved in the region. It is time for the international community to support and facilitate a genuine peace process, rather than imposing unilateral demands on Israel.
The path to peace is not a straightforward one, but with genuine commitment and a balanced approach, it is possible to achieve a just and lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This requires acknowledging the complexities and historical context of the conflict, and working towards a solution that addresses the legitimate aspirations and concerns of both Israelis and Palestinians.
By doing so, we can move closer towards a future where Israelis and Palestinians can live side by side in peace, security, and prosperity.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...