Conservative News Daily

Scientists studying the Noah’s Ark site on Mount Ararat have found evidence of human activities during the time of the Flood.

Could new analysis of a site⁢ associated with the biblical flood shine light on the account from the ‌Book of Genesis?

According to the New York Post, recent analysis of a⁤ site near Turkey’s Mount Ararat in the⁣ Middle East suggests ⁣that human activity took‌ place there between⁣ 5500 BC and⁤ 3500⁢ BC.

A team of Turkish and American academics conducted ‍the ‍analysis, ​as reported‍ by Turkey’s Hürriyet news⁢ outlet.

The‌ “Mount Ararat ​and Noah’s Ark⁣ Research Team”‌ began their studies in the area in December 2022.

According to Agri Ibrahim Cecen University Vice‌ Rector Prof.​ Dr. Faruk Kaya, ⁢the initial findings suggest that there were human activities in the region between 5500 ⁤and 3000 BC, during the⁤ Chalcolithic period.

The site revealed the presence of clayey materials, marine​ materials, and seafood.

Located about 18 miles south of Mount Ararat, the site is near the border between Iran and Turkey.

According to Scripture, Noah’s Ark eventually came‍ to rest ‌on the “mountains of Ararat.”

Some believe that⁣ the Durupinar terrain formation ⁣in the​ region is ⁣the petrified ‌remnant of the ark’s resting place, ⁣as mentioned in the Book⁤ of ⁤Genesis.

Geologists, however, consider Durupinar to‌ be a natural rock formation.

In‍ the biblical story, God commanded Noah⁢ to‌ build an ark to save humanity from a flood‌ as punishment for⁣ their sins.

Noah was instructed to bring ‍a male and female pair of ⁢every animal on board to repopulate the world after the flood.

Similar flood accounts can be found in the ancient Middle East, such as the Epic of Gilgamesh,‍ which also describes a ‍great‌ flood and the construction of a ⁢vessel to escape it, according​ to ‌ Britannica.


A Note from Our Founder:

Silicon Valley​ and the​ Big Tech tyrants ⁢have ⁢done everything they can​ to put The Western Journal ⁣out ‍of⁤ business. Our faithful subscribers have kept us going.

If you’ve never chosen to subscribe, let ⁣me be honest: We need your help today.

I also want to send you an autographed⁤ copy‌ of “Counterpunch,” which will give you a plan to fight back for our beloved ‍country.

Subscribe right⁣ now – The​ Western Journal stands for truth in this⁣ difficult‌ time.

Please stand with us ‍by subscribing today.

Floyd G. Brown
Founder of The Western Journal

The post Noah’s Ark Site on ⁤Mount Ararat Shows⁢ ‘Human ‌Activities’‌ Around Time ⁢of The Flood, Say ⁢Scientists appeared first ⁢on ⁤ The Western Journal.

What evidence does the recent analysis near Mount​ Ararat provide regarding the biblical flood and its timeline?

Wickedness.⁣ The⁤ story, which is recorded in‍ the Book of‌ Genesis, ⁢has been a subject ⁤of⁣ interest and debate for​ centuries. Scientists and archaeologists ⁣have ‌long sought evidence to support the account of the ‌biblical flood.

The ⁤recent analysis conducted by ⁣the Mount Ararat and Noah’s Ark Research Team has​ provided some‍ intriguing findings. According to the team, the site near Mount Ararat ⁤in Turkey shows evidence ​of human activity dating back to around 5500 to⁤ 3500​ BC, during‍ the Chalcolithic period. This period, also known as⁤ the Copper Age, predates ⁣the biblical account of the flood by thousands of years.

The presence of clayey materials, marine materials, and seafood at the⁢ site suggests that it was once an inhabited area. These findings indicate the possibility ⁤of‌ a community living in ⁤the region during the Chalcolithic period, ⁣which aligns ⁤with the timeframe of the biblical flood.

This discovery has sparked interest among believers who associate the site‍ with Noah’s Ark. They believe that the Durupinar terrain formation,⁤ located near the site, is the​ petrified ⁣remains of ⁢the ark’s resting place. However, geologists argue that Durupinar is a natural rock formation and not related to Noah’s Ark.

Dr. Salih Bayraktutan, a retired professor of geology and one of the original Turkish researchers ⁤of the Durupinar site, has been involved in studying the formation. His knowledge ‍and expertise have contributed to ⁤the understanding⁣ of the site’s geological features. However, his ⁤research supports the⁤ view that Durupinar is not the remains of Noah’s Ark.

While this new analysis⁣ of the ‌site near Mount Ararat​ provides interesting insights⁢ into​ the history of human activity in the region, it does⁣ not definitively prove or disprove the existence of Noah’s Ark. The ‍debate ‌surrounding the biblical ‍flood and its connection to archaeological evidence remains ongoing.

The significance of this research lies ​in the advancement of knowledge about the Chalcolithic period⁢ and the understanding of⁢ ancient ⁢civilizations in the region. ‍It sheds light on the ⁤human activities that⁤ took⁤ place thousands of​ years ago and enriches our understanding​ of human history.

As further studies and analysis continue, it is hoped that​ more conclusive evidence regarding the​ biblical flood and Noah’s Ark will⁣ emerge. Until then, the analysis of the site near Mount⁤ Ararat serves as another piece of the puzzle⁤ and contributes to⁣ the ongoing quest ‍to uncover the truth behind the⁤ biblical ‍account.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker