DEI promotes mediocrity alongside racism
Engaging Paraphrase:
Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) may sound like noble concepts, but they come with two major problems.
The first problem lies in the inherent discrimination of DEI. It assumes that success is solely a result of exploitation and discrimination, painting certain groups as perpetual victims and others as villains, regardless of their actual circumstances. This distorted hierarchy even extends to white men, who are always cast as villains, regardless of their group’s performance.
This flawed philosophy is exemplified by the “Electeds of Color” holiday party thrown by Asian Boston Mayor Michelle Wu. Such discriminatory practices are clearly wrong, but DEI proponents argue that as long as you belong to a victimized group, you can never be in the wrong.
So, the first problem with DEI is its inherent racism.
The second problem, closely tied to the first, is mediocrity. If success is deemed sinful and failure virtuous because victimhood is glorified, then mediocrity becomes the safe middle ground where one can avoid being terrible at things and escape criticism for being good at them.
WATCH: The Ben Shapiro Show
This preference for racially diverse mediocrity over merit-based achievement is evident in academia. Institutions like Harvard and Chicago prioritize diversity over non-race-based merit, allowing individuals with questionable qualifications to hold positions of power. This misguided approach hinders progress and perpetuates mediocrity.
Even the White House is not immune to this flawed ideology. The pursuit of equity above all else has led to questionable decisions, such as the underwhelming tap dance performance of the “Nutcracker” at the White House. While tap dance has a rich history and cultural significance, the chosen routine failed to impress, highlighting the mediocrity that DEI can foster.
A bit of magic, wonder, and joy brought to you by the talented tappers of Dorrance Dance, performing their playful interpretation of The Nutcracker Suite.
Enjoy! 💕 pic.twitter.com/qXtCm4t37o
— Jill Biden (@FLOTUS) December 13, 2023
The choice of Dorrance Dance for this performance raises questions about the political motivations behind the selection. Michelle Dorrance, the group’s founder, has dedicated her work to “antiracism,” emphasizing the struggle against systemic racism and white supremacy. While acknowledging the importance of tap dance as a celebration of Black culture, Dorrance’s focus on race and privilege detracts from the art itself.
In a free country, quality should be the ultimate goal. The black tap artists who have made significant contributions to the art form have done more for racial harmony and black Americans than Dorrance ever will. Their incredible talent transcends race, proving that artistry knows no boundaries.
Unfortunately, when DEI becomes the primary objective, mediocrity often prevails.
How does the practice of admitting individuals to academic qualifications based solely on their race or ethnicity undermine the principles of hard work and meritocracy?
Academic qualifications to be admitted solely based on their race or ethnicity. This not only undermines the value of hard work and meritocracy but also diminishes the accomplishments of those who have earned their achievements through dedication and talent.
Furthermore, DEI initiatives often promote a culture of victimhood, where individuals are encouraged to see themselves as oppressed and disadvantaged. While it is important to acknowledge and address historical injustices, perpetuating a victim mentality only serves to disempower individuals and hinder their personal growth and success. By constantly reminding individuals of their victim status, DEI inadvertently limits their potential and discourages them from striving for excellence.
In addition to promoting mediocrity, DEI initiatives can create a hostile and divisive environment. By categorizing individuals into groups based on their race, ethnicity, or other characteristics, DEI inadvertently fosters an “us versus them” mentality. This not only stifles open and honest dialogue but also hinders the development of meaningful relationships and collaborations among people from different backgrounds.
It is essential to recognize that true diversity and inclusion are not achieved through discriminatory practices or the glorification of victimhood. Instead, it should be based on equal opportunities, fair evaluation processes, and a genuine appreciation for the unique perspectives and contributions individuals from diverse backgrounds bring to the table.
Rather than perpetuating a culture that emphasizes differences and promotes division, there should be a focus on fostering an inclusive environment that celebrates the individual and values their abilities, regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, or any other characteristic. This can be achieved by promoting equal access to education, employment, and advancement opportunities, while also actively challenging and addressing any biases or prejudices that may exist within society.
In conclusion, while the intentions behind DEI initiatives may be noble, they come with significant problems. The inherent discrimination and focus on victimhood not only undermine the principles of fairness and meritocracy but also perpetuate mediocrity and division. True diversity and inclusion can only be achieved through a commitment to equal opportunities, merit-based evaluation, and the celebration of individual abilities and contributions. It is time to move away from flawed philosophies and strive for a more inclusive and equitable society.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...