Conservative News Daily

‘Barbenheimer’ Boosts Summer Box Office, Fails to Rescue Movie Industry

Numbers ⁢Are In: ‘Barbenheimer’ Lifts Summer Box Office ‍but Not Enough to Save Movie Industry

Well, here’s a shocker: A pseudo-event involving‍ two wildly disparate movies that happened to be opening on the same date ‌couldn’t ‍save Hollywood from another ⁤summer ‍of lackluster sequels and woke-tastic programming.

Although, if you were to look at the raw numbers, you might be misled.

Axios reported Saturday⁣ that the industry has seen $6.5⁣ billion⁣ in ⁤domestic ticket sales. ⁤According to industry publication Deadline, $4 billion ‌of that came during the traditional summer moviegoing months.

The year-to-date total is up 25‌ percent over 2022; while pandemic restrictions have eased and more people feel comfortable going back to the theater, last year was still within the return-to-normalcy window. Looking ⁢at those numbers, you might think that Hollywood execs would‌ be more thrilled than if they woke up tomorrow ‌morning and it turned out #MeToo was all just a dream, but Harvey ​Weinstein was still powerless and in prison.

However, there’s one dreadful neologism that should explain why the summer movie results are​ still terrible while sounding terrific: “Barbenheimer.”

As Axios noted, without the box-office overperformance of⁣ two heavily hyped unlikely successes released on the same ‌day — the⁤ Skittles-hued political landmine ⁤“Barbie” and the reflective Christopher Nolan biopic “Oppenheimer” — “the summer box office is a horror show.”

Those two films, which have grossed roughly $900 million in North America, represent 22⁢ percent of the box-office take this summer, Deadline reported. Without those two anchors, the ⁤summer was a sea of disappointments.

“Pricey misfires included⁤ ‘The Flash’ ​($268 million worldwide) ​and ‘Indiana Jones’ ($381 ⁣million). Even Tom Cruise ⁤couldn’t deliver as ‘Mission:⁢ Impossible – Dead Reckoning Part 1′ pulled‌ in $552 million, the series’ lowest since ‘Mission: Impossible III’ in 2006,” Axios noted.

And then, after Americans were marked safe from ⁤the “Barbenheimer” pseudo-event, the rising tide didn’t lift all ships. Most of the late summer releases fizzled, too — most ⁤notably the‍ DC Comics film “Blue Beetle,” which took home just $84 million in two weeks.

Not‍ that this ‌is a surprise — estimates in ‌July had “Blue Beetle” losing up to $200 million at the box office ‍and needing at least $250 million in receipts to turn a profit.⁣ It was a sobering reminder that the overperformance of “Barbie” and ⁣“Oppenheimer” can’t wallpaper over ‌those “pricey misfires.”

A good number of those bombs, it’s worth ⁢noting,‌ were dripping with⁣ a slathered-on coat of wokeness. For instance, “Blue Beetle” was marketed as the‍ first major superhero film to feature a Latino lead.

In an approving review for RogerEbert.com, Robert Daniels noted with some degree of approval that​ the villain played⁣ by Susan Sarandon⁢ “is hardly configured; it doesn’t take much guessing to know they’re a metaphor for the⁤ past and present ills of white-American imperialism” ⁣and that the ⁢film’s “political invocations, such ⁤as an ‌allusion to the School of‌ the Americas ⁤(a major topic ⁤to cover in a big-budget film) and a harrowing scene of a raid upon the ‍Reyes​ home, while overwrought in its use of slow⁢ motion, humanizes ⁤endangered emigrant families, are daring subplots to‍ add.”

Well, that dare didn’t quite pay off, now, did it?

“The Flash,” meanwhile, was the​ first superhero film with a​ star who identified in real life (not the film’s universe) as nonbinary, using “they”/”them” pronouns. Actor Ezra ‍Miller’s myriad legal​ struggles (also in real life)⁣ — combined with a convoluted plot involving time travel and two different versions of Batman and ‍Superman, among other weirdnesses — kept audiences away from⁣ the cinema for that one.

Pixar’s woke tale ‍“Elemental” also flopped (sample ​review: “When‍ a significant part of the conflict in​ a cartoon about talking elemental beings turns on urban infrastructure problems, building code violations, and city bureaucracy, something has gone off the rails”), as did the latest Disney⁢ live-action remake that existed for ⁢no reason but to racially swap the lead: “The Little Mermaid,” with Halle Bailey as Ariel, came in under $300 million, according to IndieWire — not enough to recoup​ costs for an expensive production.

It’s also worth noting that non-woke films also flopped. “Fast X” — which, I’m assuming from my desultory knowledge of‌ “Fast⁢ and⁢ Furious” iterations, includes lots of loud CGI cars doing impossible things and innumerable invocations of the word “family,” not really “Democracy⁤ Now!” territory — underperformed, as did “Transformers:⁤ Rise of the Beast” and “Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.‍ 3.”

The last one was Disney-produced, so perhaps the politically inclined could blame it on that company’s image problems. “Fast X” was⁣ put out by Universal and “Transformers” by Paramount, however, ⁣so that excuse ‌doesn’t hold for those duds.

But, perhaps the surest sign the times are ⁢a-changin’ in Hollywood ⁣was the biggest positive surprise of the summer, at least⁣ from ‌a purely monetary standpoint: “Sound of Freedom,” the independently produced‌ drama about child sex-trafficking, grossed over $180 million and was ‍a​ shock blockbuster — in spite of a hue and cry from the liberal media, which ⁢declared it a QAnon dog whistle, ‍inter alia.

And then there’s the storm on the horizon: the writers/actors strike that has paralyzed Hollywood and ⁤almost all non-independent productions. “The spring⁣ movies will wind up becoming ‌the summer movies next year,” one insider told Deadline, a prediction the outlet said was laden “with doom and gloom.”

So, is it wokeness, sequelitis or changed post-pandemic movie habits‍ that contributed to non-“Barbenheimer” disappointments?

Yes, yes and yes, probably.

It’s difficult to point to a single cause other than the fact Hollywood is​ an ossified agitprop machine that still believes that if it churns it out, you have‍ to watch it,⁤ no matter how much it costs or whether it conflicts with your worldview. Everyone else is seeing it, so why aren’t you? You’re going to ‌miss‍ out on the discussion. Don’t be the one who isn’t talking about [insert blockbuster here]. Don’t you want to be up on​ pop culture?

Well, as it turns out, no. People aren’t seeing everything pushed in our faces anymore, and Hollywood’s grandiose budgets and⁣ inattention to half of America’s sociopolitical and religious beliefs suddenly‍ seem unsustainable.

Of course, they never were sustainable‍ in the first place, and they can’t just​ pull a “Barbenheimer” ‌every year to make up the ⁤difference.

(“Coming as soon as we resolve this pesky strike: ‘Feynken,’ the same-day release of a biopic ‌of quirky,​ bongo-playing Manhattan Project physicist Richard Feynman, and the ‘Barbie’ sequel ‘Ken!’” Yeah, I don’t see that working again, either.)

Ah well. This all couldn’t have happened to a better ‍bunch‌ of people.

The post‍ Numbers Are In: ‘Barbenheimer’ Lifts Summer Box Office but Not Enough to Save Movie Industry appeared first on The Western Journal.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker