Obama alumni criticize Biden’s disorganized reelection campaign

Obama ​Campaign‍ Veterans Criticize⁢ Biden’s Reelection Effort

Several individuals involved with former President Barack Obama’s campaigns have come forward with criticism of President Joe Biden’s reelection ⁤effort.

Several team Obama veterans met in ‍late ​2023 in Chicago, Illinois, where ‍they discussed their successful⁤ 2012 reelection effort — and its notable differences from Biden’s 2024 campaign.

A Democratic operative in attendance ​characterized the⁢ feelings of the group. “The vibe was that the campaign didn’t have its s*** ‍together,”​ the Obama alumnus‍ told Politico.

“There wasn’t infrastructure in ⁢the states. There wasn’t a⁣ beefed-up campaign headquarters. And compared to where⁤ Obama‍ was​ in 2011,​ the campaign was fairly anemic,”‍ they added.

In ​a statement ⁢to Politico, Biden spokesman Kevin​ Munoz⁣ said, ⁣“We invite‍ everyone‍ concerned about the⁤ existential threat that Donald​ Trump⁢ and MAGA Republicans pose⁢ to our freedom and democracy to channel ​their energy ⁢toward organizing, donating and talking to their‌ friends about the stakes of this election and⁣ President Biden’s commitment​ to fighting these threats head on.”

Despite the criticism, ‌Biden’s campaign revealed Monday it raised more⁣ than $97 million in the fourth ⁣quarter ⁣of 2023. It also announced ‍it had $117⁣ million in cash⁢ on‍ hand, noting this is the‍ highest of any Democratic candidate in U.S. history. The campaign further pointed out the​ 2024 war chest ‌is more than the totality of ​primary spending on ads by ⁢GOP opponents in Iowa.

Even with ‍continued fundraising ‌success, the⁣ campaign hasn’t addressed areas of concern for Obama-era staffers and advisers.

One of the chief concerns for Biden’s ⁤operation ‌is⁣ a lack of understanding on how to run a successful ground game in swing states.

“The​ big issue⁢ I have⁣ is Biden never had ‍an⁤ organization before.‍ He didn’t have much in the⁢ Dem primary.⁤ Then the general was⁤ during Covid and no ground stuff was really ⁢done,” a former⁣ Obama battleground state ⁤director in⁢ 2012 said.

Another critique⁢ of ‌Biden’s⁢ effort was his hesitance to‍ move key ⁢White ⁢House officials to his campaign team⁤ early.

“There is a treasure trove of experience in that‌ White House. I mean, one​ of the ‌issues⁢ is it’s ⁣all in the White House,” former chief strategist⁣ to ⁤Obama David⁢ Axelrod said. ⁣“Probably some of it should be⁤ sitting over at ‍the ​campaign.”

However, ​others were defensive of the campaign’s current approach ⁤and trajectory.

Jim Messina, Obama’s reelection ⁤campaign⁣ manager, explained the strategy behind waiting to deploy certain⁤ infrastructure. “Your ‌average⁤ swing voter pays attention to ⁢politics ​four minutes a week ⁢until the few months leading​ up to November,” he explained.

“So ⁤the way they’re working to activate the⁢ base and ‌get out their message — and the stakes of making the right choice ⁤in the inevitable ​Biden/Trump rematch — to other groups is smart,” he added.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

⁢What⁢ are the specific concerns ‌about ⁣the ⁤lack of infrastructure in the Biden campaign highlighted by the Obama ‍campaign ⁣veterans?

Ncern highlighted by the Obama campaign ​veterans. One⁢ such concern is the lack of infrastructure in the states, which was ⁣a crucial ‍element in⁤ Obama’s⁣ successful reelection campaign. The absence of a beefed-up⁢ campaign headquarters and a ⁢relatively anemic campaign‌ compared to Obama’s efforts⁤ in ‍2011 have also been ⁣pointed out.

In response to these criticisms, Biden’s‍ spokesman, Kevin ‍Munoz, called on everyone concerned about the existential ⁤threat posed by⁤ Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans⁤ to focus their energy ⁣on organizing,‌ donating, ‌and talking to their friends ​about the stakes of this ‍election. ​Munoz emphasized President ⁢Biden’s commitment to fighting these threats head-on.

Despite the criticism, Biden’s campaign announced impressive fundraising numbers, raising over $97 million in​ the fourth quarter of⁣ 2023. Additionally, the campaign‍ revealed that‌ it currently has ⁤$117 million in cash on hand, making it the highest amount ever​ for any Democratic candidate in U.S. history. It is ‍worth noting that the campaign’s war chest ​for the 2024 election surpasses the total spending on ads by ‌GOP opponents in Iowa during the primary.

However, while the fundraising success is commendable, it ​is important for the campaign to address the concerns raised by the Obama campaign veterans. Without a strong ‌infrastructure and a robust campaign headquarters, the⁤ Biden campaign may face difficulties ⁣in effectively reaching voters and mobilizing support. It is crucial⁣ for the campaign to learn from the experiences of⁤ the Obama campaigns and make the necessary adjustments to ensure a successful‍ reelection​ effort.

As the 2024 election approaches,​ it is essential for the Biden campaign to take these⁢ criticisms⁣ seriously and work towards strengthening their campaign efforts.⁢ The ⁣stakes are high, ‍and the ​threats posed by Trump and his followers should ⁣not​ be underestimated. By addressing the concerns ⁤raised by the⁣ Obama campaign veterans and building a solid⁤ infrastructure,⁤ the Biden campaign can increase their chances of securing victory in⁣ the upcoming‍ election.

In conclusion, criticism from⁢ Obama campaign veterans about ‍President Biden’s reelection effort highlights areas of concern ​regarding the campaign’s infrastructure and overall preparedness. While the campaign has achieved significant fundraising success, ⁢it is important for them to address these concerns​ and learn from the successful strategies employed ⁤during Obama’s ​campaigns. By doing so,‌ the ‍Biden campaign can enhance ‍their chances of ‍securing victory and effectively combating the ⁤threats posed ⁤by Trump and his followers.