The federalist

Ohio Republican proposes bill to prohibit ranked-choice voting in statewide elections.


Following the lead ⁢of other Republican-led states, an Ohio legislator introduced​ legislation on Thursday‌ that would prohibit the use of ranked-choice voting ​for state and federal elections.

Under RCV,⁣ often dubbed “rigged-choice voting” ⁣by⁢ its critics, voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate receives more than 50 percent of first-choice votes in the first ⁢round of ⁤voting, the ⁣last-place finisher is eliminated, and his votes are reallocated to the voter’s ​second-choice candidate. This process continues until one candidate receives a majority‍ of votes.

Introduced by GOP Sen. Theresa Gavarone, SB 137 stipulates that “no election shall be ⁤conducted in this state using ranked choice⁤ voting or instant runoff ‌voting.” While the measure allows localities to ‌adopt RCV ⁤for their respective municipal elections, it includes an additional provision making said localities “ineligible⁣ to receive any‌ local government fund distributions from the ‌state.”

“Ranked choice voting, in its ⁢most basic form, distorts election outcomes. If⁢ implemented in Ohio, it​ would undo more than two centuries of‍ voters having the ability to cast their vote with one vote and one ⁤voice, and alter our elections⁤ to look similar to the‍ way⁤ it’s done in New York City ⁢and San ‍Francisco,” Gavarone said in a statement.

Gavarone was notably one of the main players ‌behind⁤ the introduction of ⁣the DATA Act,⁣ which was recently signed into law as part of the state’s biennial budget. That ‍measure is⁤ aimed at ⁤bringing transparency to Ohio’s ​voter data and elections.

Various U.S.​ municipalities that have ‍adopted ranked-choice voting have experienced confusing and ‍even inaccurate election outcomes. In ‍an Oakland school board ⁤race, for instance, “election officials announced — two months after the fact — that they got ‌the count ⁤wrong,” resulting in the “rightful winner… suing ⁣ for‌ his ‌seat.”​ After using RCV for a June‍ 20 ⁣primary election, officials in Arlington,‌ Virginia recently opted not to use the practice for‌ the city’s upcoming fall ‌elections, “pointing to confusion about the ​process”⁣ among voters and “concerns about whether outreach efforts were translating to diverse support for the new system.”

Alaska — ‌one of only two ‍states to implement ranked-choice voting so far — has also had its fair share of problems, such⁢ as⁢ election outcomes that contradict the will⁤ of voters. Last ​year, ⁤Democrat‌ Mary Peltola won ‍the state’s at-large congressional seat even though “nearly 60 ⁤percent of voters [cast] their ballots for a ⁢Republican.” RCV also played a ⁢major role in helping Alaska ​GOP ⁢Sen. Lisa Murkowski win reelection during the ‌2022‍ midterms.

Among ‍the states to have banned the use of⁢ ranked-choice voting in elections are Florida, Tennessee, South Dakota, Idaho, ⁣and Montana. Other states, ‌such as Oregon, are looking⁣ to adopt the use of RCV for their elections.


Shawn Fleetwood is a staff ⁣writer for ​The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. ‍He previously served as a state content writer for Convention ​of⁣ States Action and his work has⁢ been featured in ​numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics,⁢ RealClearHealth, and Conservative‌ Review. ‍Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood

Popular



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker