Washington Examiner

Ohio woman not charged for allegedly flushing stillborn fetus

An Ohio Grand Jury Clears Woman Accused ‍of Flushing Stillborn Fetus Down Toilet

An Ohio ⁣grand jury made a decision ⁢on Thursday ⁢not to press charges against Brittany Watts, a ⁢34-year-old woman from Warren, Ohio, who was accused of attempting to ⁤flush her stillborn fetus down the toilet. The Trumbull County⁣ grand jury chose not to indict her on charges related to felony abuse of a corpse, sparing her from a potential prison sentence ​of‌ up to five years and⁣ a $2,500‍ fine.

There⁣ was evidence to support the case against Watts, as she had made multiple visits to Mercy Health-St. Joseph’s Hospital in the days ‍leading up ‍to the miscarriage. A local judge ruled that there was probable cause to proceed with the⁣ case, based on the prosecution’s argument that Watts had tried to flush⁢ her 22-week-old nonviable⁤ fetus down the toilet. The‌ doctor had advised against⁢ inducing labor due to‌ the significant risk of death.

“Justice has been⁢ served,” said ‍Traci Timko, legal counsel for Watts. “The grand ‍jury’s decision vindicates Brittany after months of agony.”

Watts plans⁤ to use her ⁤experience to advocate for legislation that supports ‌women’s rights ‌and ensures that no other woman in Ohio has to prioritize healing from grief and trauma⁣ over fighting for her freedom and reputation.

National Attention and Support

Watts’s case gained national attention due⁣ to⁢ its implications in a post-Roe world. Following the grand jury’s announcement, around 150 supporters gathered​ outside‌ the courthouse for a “We Stand With⁢ Brittany!” protest.

“I want to thank my community — Warren, Ohio,” ⁣Watts⁢ expressed her gratitude to the supporters. “I‌ was born​ here, raised here, and I will continue to fight for justice here.”

What steps can be taken to provide better support and resources for women⁢ dealing ‍with stillbirths ⁣or⁤ miscarriages, as highlighted by Brittany Watts’s case

An ⁢Ohio‌ grand ⁢jury has decided ⁤not to press charges against Brittany ⁢Watts, a ‌34-year-old woman from ⁢Warren, Ohio,⁣ who was accused of ‌attempting to flush her stillborn fetus down the toilet. The Trumbull ‍County grand jury chose not to indict her on ‍charges‍ related to felony abuse of a corpse, thus sparing her from a potential⁤ prison sentence of up to‌ five years and a $2,500 fine.

There was evidence to support the case against Watts as she had made multiple⁣ visits to Mercy ​Health-St. Joseph’s Hospital ‌in the days leading up to the miscarriage.⁢ A​ local judge ruled​ that​ there was probable cause to proceed with the case based on the prosecution’s argument​ that Watts had tried to flush her 22-week-old nonviable ⁢fetus down⁤ the toilet. The doctor had advised against inducing labor due to the significant risk of death.

Traci Timko, ​legal counsel for Watts, stated, ⁣”Justice has been served. The grand jury’s decision vindicates Brittany after months of agony.”

Watts plans to use her⁢ experience to advocate for‍ legislation that supports women’s rights and⁤ ensures​ that​ no other woman in Ohio ​has ⁤to ⁤prioritize healing​ from grief ‍and trauma over fighting for her freedom and reputation.

Watts’s case gained national⁤ attention due to its implications in a ⁤post-Roe world. Following the grand jury’s announcement, around 150 supporters gathered outside the courthouse for a‍ “We Stand With Brittany!” ⁣protest.

“I⁣ want to thank my community — Warren, Ohio,” expressed Watts, expressing her gratitude to the supporters. “I was born here, ⁣raised⁤ here, and I will continue‍ to fight for justice here.”

This case has ‍sparked a⁢ broader conversation about ⁣the rights​ of women‌ in ​similar situations. It highlights the need for compassion, understanding, and access ​to proper healthcare for women experiencing stillbirths or miscarriages. The fact that Brittany Watts faced potential legal consequences in the midst of her personal tragedy⁢ highlights the complex intersection of reproductive rights and criminal justice.

Many advocates argue that ⁢criminalizing⁢ actions taken by women in these emotionally devastating moments does not serve ‌justice. Instead, they argue for providing support, resources, and adequate healthcare ​to women dealing​ with⁢ the loss of their unborn children.

Watts’s case ⁣also underscores‍ the need for greater public awareness and education surrounding stillbirths and miscarriages. It is crucial‍ to foster a society⁢ in which women feel comfortable seeking medical help and support during difficult times without fear of judgment or legal repercussions.

While the grand jury’s decision relieved ‍Brittany Watts from the ⁣immediate legal consequences, ‍the emotional toll and lasting‌ trauma from this⁣ experience ⁢will undoubtedly remain. It is hoped that through her advocacy efforts, she can​ make a meaningful impact on the lives​ of women in similar situations and bring positive change to laws and policies surrounding reproductive rights in Ohio and‌ beyond.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker