Olympics May Completely Ban Trans Competitors – Likely New President’s Top Priority
The article discusses Kirsty Coventry,a candidate for the presidency of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and a former Olympic swimmer,who has expressed her support for a complete ban on transgender athletes competing in women’s events. Coventry emphasizes the importance of protecting women’s sports, citing scientific research that indicates transgender women may possess physical advantages over cisgender women. She argues that this situation could jeopardize fair opportunities for female athletes. Coventry’s stance emerges from her experience in overseeing the Paris Olympics, where controversies surrounding athlete eligibility arose. As she campaigns for IOC leadership, her position on this contentious issue reflects a growing discourse in the U.S. around the participation of transgender athletes in competitive sports. The article suggests that the upcoming 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles could influence perceptions and policies regarding transgender competition in sports.
One of the candidates to lead the International Olympic Committee backs a blanket prohibition for so-called transgender athletes participating in events against members of the opposite sex, which is brutal news for any of them seeking to follow such a course in their quest to clinch the gold.
Kirsty Coventry, a decorated former Olympian from Zimbabwe and a member of the IOC executive board since 2018, is currently running to be the next president of the entity.
She favors a blanket ban on transgenderism at the Olympics, according to a report last month from U.K.’s The Telegraph.
“Protecting the female category and female sports is paramount — it’s a priority that we collectively come together,” Coventry said.
“There is more and more scientific research. We are not having a conversation about how it is detrimental to men’s sport. That, in itself, says we need to protect women’s sport,” she continued.
Coventry, who has won seven Olympic medals in swimming, including two gold medals, also claimed, “It is very clear that transgender women are more able in the female category, and can take away opportunities that should be equal for women.”
Coventry has witnessed firsthand the disaster that can emerge from allowing men to compete against women, particularly in sports with more physical contact.
She helped to preside over the Paris Olympics, where boxing athletes Lin Yu-ting and Imane Khelif won gold, even though they had previously been deemed ineligible for boxing against women by the International Boxing Association.
Coventry said that “lessons are always going to be learnt — Paris is definitely one of those times.”
“I don’t believe that this is something in hindsight that we could have predicted because these boxers had bouts against each other and there hadn’t been previous issues,” she claimed.
“When you have such a sensitive issue being put on the global stage you have to make sure that the athletes are being protected — that their rights are being heard — and that they are being protected on both sides,” Coventry added.
Though she may not be a conservative stalwart on this issue, at least she is willing to have a ban.
And the next location of the summer Olympics may not hurt her chances.
Los Angeles will welcome athletes for the summer games in 2028, and President Donald Trump, who broadly opposes men in women’s sports, will still be the commander-in-chief.
Whether or not the Olympics decides to go the way of common sense and basic biology, there is clearly some movement toward rationality on these matters here in the United States.
There is a lot of ground to be won back, but most Americans are at least holding the line against transgender insanity, especially in its more absurd expressions, like sending men into boxing rings to beat up on women.
Hopefully the Olympics comes to its senses, as well.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...