Op-Ed: How Lawmakers Can Cut Costs for Consumers, Small Businesses by Loosening Visa’s Financial Grip
This text discusses a upcoming Senate hearing about legislation aimed at addressing the monopolistic practices of credit card companies, primarily Visa and Mastercard. It highlights the detrimental effects of their dominance on small businesses and consumers, particularly through rising “swipe fees” which burden both groups.
Key points include:
1. **Monopolistic Practices**: Visa has developed strategies to maintain dominance, stifling competition and innovation in the payments industry. This has led to Visa and Mastercard controlling nearly 75% of the credit card market.
2. **Impact on Small Businesses**: Small businesses face increasing swipe fees, which are a significant operating expense, often second only to labor costs. In 2023, these fees amounted to $135 billion, marking a $10 billion increase from the previous year.
3. **Consumer Burden**: Higher swipe fees also lead to increased prices for consumers. In the past year, it is estimated that Americans paid an additional $1,102 due to rising costs associated with these fees.
4. **Legislative Response**: The proposed Credit Card Competition Act aims to promote competition by requiring large banks to offer a second processing network alongside Visa and Mastercard. This could lead to substantial savings for both businesses and consumers—estimated at around $16 billion annually.
5. **Call to Action**: The author urges lawmakers to pass this legislation during the upcoming Senate session, emphasizing the need for competition to foster a fairer marketplace and reduce costs for everyone involved.
the piece makes a strong case for reform to break the control that Visa and Mastercard have over the credit card market, advocating for policies that support competition and lower fees.
The 2024 election cycle is behind us, and lawmakers can get back to getting work done on behalf of the American people.
Given the biggest factors of the presidential race were the economy and inflation, Congress has a mandate during the lame duck session to address consumer costs. An upcoming Senate hearing on bipartisan legislation that rehabs the payments arena is a golden opportunity to bring the issue to the forefront and deliver for the American people.
Stronger alternatives in the credit card industry are sorely needed. Visa and other large corporate powerhouses have established a monopoly-like presence in the payments arena, granting the company total control over the fees it charges small businesses.
As reported in The Wall Street Journal, as e-commerce exploded in the 2010s and Americans moved away from using cash, Visa designed a series of strategies to prevent financial and tech companies from encroaching on its turf. Practices like aligning incentives with Apple, strong-arming Paypal, and undercutting Chase Bank are some of the many examples.
Not only has Visa’s actions hindered innovation, but they’ve also enabled the company to capture more and more of the credit and debit card market . In fact, Visa and Mastercard — the second largest card issuer and Visa’s closest competitor — now account for nearly three-quarters of all credit card purchases.
Because of its dominance in the payments arena, Visa has been able to rake in profits through exorbitant fees with minimal pushback. One prime example is credit card “swipe fees.”
“Swipe fees” are a transaction tax that gets levied on small businesses each time a customer taps, inserts, or swipes a credit card. While they were initially introduced to offset the cost of processing a transaction, technological advancements in the payments sector have significantly lowered the cost of doing business.
The kicker? Despite these lower costs, “swipe fees” have continued to rise.
In 2023, major credit card networks like Visa swiped $135 billion from small businesses. And that’s a $10 billion increase compared to the year before. For many small businesses, “swipe fees” are often the second highest operating expense behind labor costs.
And it’s not just merchants feeling the burn — American consumers are bearing the brunt, as well. These extra costs often translate to higher prices at checkout. Last year alone, Americans paid an additional $1,102 thanks to the growing expenses associated with “swipe fees.”
Recognizing the burden on both businesses and consumers, the U.S. Department of Justice recently filed an antitrust lawsuit against Visa alleging it illegally monopolized the debit card market. Officials claim Visa set the U.S. payments system years behind the rest of the world.
Enter the Credit Card Competition Act. The measure — which was co-sponsored by a bipartisan coalition of lawmakers including soon-to-be Vice President J.D. Vance — would curb Visa’s unchecked power by promoting competition in the credit card industry.
The legislation mandates that large banks with over $100 billion in assets include a second processing network — in addition to Visa and Mastercard — on the credit cards they issue to consumers. Doing so would pressure credit card networks to lower their “swipe fees” to compete for a merchant’s business, driving down costs in the process.
If passed, businesses and consumers are expected to save $16 billion annually. It’s a no-brainer for lawmakers looking to support a fairer marketplace and reduce costs for hard working Americans.
Competition is the cornerstone of a healthy economy. But the unrestrained dominance of power players like Visa silences both businesses and consumers. Federal lawmakers should keep this in mind and pass the Credit Card Competition Act during this year’s lame duck session.
The views expressed in this opinion article are those of their author and are not necessarily either d or endorsed by the owners of this website. If you are interested in contributing an Op-Ed to The Western Journal, you can learn about our submission guidelines and process here.
Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
Now loading...