Peter Doocy confronts John Kirby on illegal immigration, questioning why they are facilitating the process
Fox News Reporter Challenges National Security Council Director on Biden Administration’s Lawsuit Against Texas
Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy didn’t hold back when questioning John Kirby, the National Security Council’s strategic communications director, about the Biden administration’s lawsuit against Texas. Doocy’s inquiries came after the Supreme Court authorized Biden’s Border Patrol to remove razor wire placed along the border by Texas officials in an effort to slow down illegal immigration.
Doocy directly asked Kirby, “Why are you guys making it easier for people to enter the country illegally?” Kirby, on the defensive, responded, ”I don’t believe we are. Why do you think we are?”
Doocy then pointed out that the administration sued to remove the razor wire installed by Texas officials. The exchange was captured on video, which you can watch below:
John Kirby: “[B]ut keep going.”
Doocy: “Well, you won in court. So, now what? The Border Patrol union president is saying the Supreme Court’s decision is going to undoubtedly encourage more illegal immigration. Do you guys know better than the Border Patrol union?”
Kirby: “The… pic.twitter.com/drid5M4rN4
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) January 23, 2024
Kirby argued that the razor wire had to be removed to allow Border Patrol agents to effectively perform their duties. However, Doocy persisted, questioning whether the administration knew better than the Border Patrol union, which believed that the Supreme Court’s decision would encourage more illegal immigration.
Doocy then asked, “Does razor wire work?” Kirby responded, “Does it work for the Border Patrol to allow them to have the access they need to be able to better process people that are trying to get across the border? I don’t think so, and that’s why we asked for it to be removed.” Another video capturing this exchange can be seen below:
Doocy: “But what is the President’s plan? This is happening just weeks after 300,000 people came to this country, over the southern border illegally. The razor wire — officials down there think was keeping some of them out. And you guys just sued and won to remove it.”
Kirby:… pic.twitter.com/FTgCEmSv7Z
— Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) January 23, 2024
Doocy persisted, questioning the president’s plan and highlighting the recent surge of illegal immigration. Kirby maintained that the administration’s goal was to provide Border Patrol agents with the necessary access to carry out their duties effectively.
Representative Lance Gooden (R-TX) supported Doocy’s perspective, stating, “Texas used razor wire to secure the border. The Biden Admin then sent a cease & desist order. Arizona used shipping containers to secure the border. The Biden Admin then sued Arizona. Joe Biden is actively fighting against efforts to secure the border.”
Texas used razor wire to secure the border.
The Biden Admin then sent a cease & desist order.Arizona used shipping containers to secure the border.
The Biden Admin then sued Arizona.Joe Biden is actively fighting against efforts to secure the border.
— Lance Gooden (@Lancegooden) January 19, 2024
Does the Biden administration’s decision to remove razor wire contradict the efforts made by Texas officials in addressing illegal immigration and protecting communities?
For an effective border security strategy?” Doocy pressed further, asking if the administration believed that removing the razor wire would make it easier for people to enter the country illegally.
Kirby reiterated that the decision to remove the razor wire was based on the needs of the Border Patrol agents. He explained that the razor wire hindered their ability to respond effectively to potential threats and to provide humanitarian assistance to migrants in need.
Doocy countered by mentioning that Texas officials had installed the razor wire in the first place to address the issue of illegal immigration and to protect their communities. He questioned whether the Biden administration’s actions contradicted the efforts made by Texas.
Kirby defended the administration’s position, stating that their approach prioritized a comprehensive immigration policy rather than relying solely on physical barriers. He emphasized that their goal was to address the root causes of migration and to provide appropriate legal channels for individuals seeking to enter the country.
The exchange between Doocy and Kirby highlights the ongoing debate surrounding immigration policies under the Biden administration. It underscores differing opinions on how to address the challenges posed by illegal immigration, with Doocy questioning the administration’s decision and referencing concerns raised by the Border Patrol union.
The Biden administration’s decision to sue Texas over the removal of razor wire demonstrates their stance on the issue. They prioritize a more humanitarian and comprehensive approach to immigration, aiming to address the factors that drive individuals to cross the border illegally.
While Doocy’s questioning reflects the opinion shared by some critics of the administration’s policies, it is crucial to note that this is just one perspective. The ongoing immigration crisis requires a multifaceted approach, taking into account both security concerns and humanitarian considerations.
The exchange between Doocy and Kirby serves as a reminder of the importance of open dialogue and scrutiny in matters of national security and immigration. As reporters, it is their duty to ask tough questions, challenge assumptions, and hold officials accountable. It is through these dialogues that the public can gain a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding immigration and national security.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
