The federalist

Police shooting of Ta’Kiya Young highlights unnecessary danger created by suspects.

Many high-profile police incidents could be prevented if the suspect didn’t escalate the situation through noncompliance or physical resistance.⁢ Despite claims by corporate media, suspects escalate most of these situations, not the police. The latest example occurred on Aug. ⁣24 near Columbus, Ohio, when Ta’Kiya Young was fatally shot by a ⁢Blendon‍ Township police officer in a Kroger parking lot.

Escalation and Tragedy

Just prior ⁢to the shooting, two ​officers were already in the parking lot ‍responding to an unrelated call. A Kroger employee approached them and accused Young of stealing bottles of liquor, pointing to Young as she climbed into her‌ Lexus sedan that was illegally parked ‌ in a handicapped spot ‌and missing a ​license plate. The officers confronted Young while⁣ she was sitting in ⁢her vehicle, and things escalated quickly after Young repeatedly refused to exit her car, and instead drove ⁢forward while a police officer was standing directly in front of ⁢her⁤ vehicle —⁣ plowing into him and lifting both his feet off the⁢ ground.

The officer fired a single shot ‌through⁤ the windshield. Young ⁢was pregnant, and her unborn baby did not survive. A detailed explanation and video of the incident is⁢ available here.

It should go without saying that if a police officer is standing in ⁤front⁤ of your vehicle with‍ his firearm drawn, ⁢you should not plow into him — even if you are innocent.​ It’s just a simple ​truism. Ta’Kiya Young’s decision in that ⁢moment unquestionably resulted in⁢ her death.

The Role of Police Tactics

Critics of this advice will suggest ⁢the officer shouldn’t have ⁢blocked her vehicle ‌with his body.⁢ But as retired Sheriff ‍Russ Martin explained for Forbes, the two officers were conducting what ⁣police commonly refer to as “contact and cover.” Because officers are vulnerable when approaching someone sitting in a car, they are trained to ​use one officer⁢ for “contact,” or conversing with the driver, and a second officer for “cover.”⁣ In this scenario, the officer in front of ​the car was performing the “cover” function, apparently getting a better vantage point to keep an eye on what the suspect was doing inside the vehicle.

Furthermore, if the officer hadn’t stood in front of Young’s car, she would have fled the scene. At that point, the officers would have had two options: ⁣a high-speed chase or just ⁢letting her go. The latter is​ the type of soft-on-crime approach​ to policing that encourages things like shoplifting. If⁣ alleged criminals can‍ avoid arrest simply by refusing to comply, there⁤ is no point in calling the ⁣police in the first place. This ‍is precisely what is happening in cities across the ​nation ‍that have all but decriminalized things such as petty theft, resulting in skyrocketing rates of criminality. Others might⁣ claim the officers could have‍ used a patrol car to block Young’s‌ vehicle, but that didn’t appear to be an option⁢ based on​ how this unfolded. The whole‌ ordeal lasted less than a minute.

Alternative Scenarios

A column by Amelia Robinson at The Columbus Dispatch suggested Young could have been⁢ tracked to her house, but law enforcement cannot let suspected criminals flee‌ the scene of a crime for obvious reasons. Alternatively, Robinson wondered if Young’s car could have been disabled, presumably suggesting that as Young sped away, the two officers ⁣should​ have emptied their pistol magazines trying to shoot out Young’s ⁤tires. In other words, the lives of innocent bystanders should have been put at risk because Young ‌couldn’t be bothered to follow basic instructions. Bullets can ricochet off pavement and ‍metal, and‌ who knows if other shoppers‌ would have ⁢been in the flight path of those bullets.‌

But let’s be honest, would Robinson — or ⁢the rest of media activists who reflexively go ‌after law enforcement or misrepresent their⁢ actions any time officers use deadly force — have applauded the officers if a ‍pregnant black⁤ woman drove ​through a Kroger parking lot under a hail of gunfire ‍from two⁤ police officers? I really doubt it. Robinson and others like her would have a ⁤different set of ​complaints if the ⁤officers did anything except allow Young to drive off into the sunset.

We can all agree this was a terrible situation, made even worse because Young was pregnant, but she was⁢ a grossly negligent parent ‍that day. She endangered her baby by refusing ⁣to exit her vehicle.⁤ If the ⁣officer‌ had not ⁤been standing in front of her car,⁤ she would have sped away⁢ and possibly caused a high-speed chase, putting her baby in danger and anyone⁢ else who happened to be in her path. There is no scenario‍ in‍ which Young can be alleviated of responsibility.

Sean Walton, ⁣the ⁣attorney hired by Young’s family, claimed Young was “unarmed.” Walton could be competing with Ben Crump for the country’s most dishonest ambulance chaser who earns a living by stoking racial animosity.‌ Walton must have been busy jogging behind ⁢an ambulance when a terrorist in France murdered 86 people by running ‌them over with a truck. Vehicles become weapons the moment they are weaponized.

Media Bias and ‍Selective⁣ Outrage

The media do not care about this woman or her baby,⁣ nor do they care about preventing these tragedies in the ⁢future. If‌ they did, they would offer the only ⁣advice that is guaranteed to reduce the number of these incidents,‍ and it goes⁢ something like this: The time to argue with⁣ police is not in‌ the street.‌ If you believe you are wrongly accused of a ‌crime, you ​will be provided an opportunity to⁤ make your case without‌ putting yourself and others in danger. This is not a “conservative”​ position — it’s common sense.

Could someone dig⁢ up a story where a⁣ suspect fully complied and‍ was still killed? Sure, but ⁣those incidents⁣ are extraordinarily rare. No honest person would ​suggest⁢ they be used as the basis for advising citizens who are stopped by police. In⁣ fact, even if an officer’s response⁤ to noncompliance is excessive, the suspect still deserves criticism for being noncompliant.

Something else we learned from this‌ shooting is that the media were distraught over the death of Young’s unborn baby not because​ they think unborn babies have intrinsic value, but because the death of her baby provided⁢ political fodder. Absent political benefit, the media couldn’t care less about her unborn child. If ⁣Young had decided on a whim that⁣ she no longer wanted her child and therefore ​had the baby killed at⁣ an abortion facility, the media would have enthusiastically applauded her decision to exercise her imaginary right to​ take her​ child’s life.

Democrats have largely ignored decades ⁣of staggering loss of ⁤black life ‍attributable ‍to black-on-black murder in our cities,⁤ and they yawn ‌as more black babies are aborted than born in New York City. They ignore these things because​ the left assigns value to the lives‌ of⁣ black Americans based solely on political expediency, and their editorial decisions are crafted for the express purpose of dividing people by⁤ race.

This shooting will be no different. ⁢Rabid ideologues aren’t capable of anything else.




" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker