The epoch times

Experts claim that federal grant-giving departments have been taken over by the political left.

The Federal ‍Government’s ​Funding‌ of⁣ LGBT Causes: A Left-Wing Capture

According to experts, the ‍federal government’s financial ​support ​for ⁣transgenderism and other LGBT initiatives is ⁣a result of ​left-wing bureaucrats dominating federal⁢ grant-giving programs. “When you dig into⁤ who staffs federal agencies, they’re absolutely dominated by​ people on the left side of the political spectrum,” says ⁢David Ditch, senior budget policy analyst for The Heritage Foundation. This trend has ​persisted⁢ for​ a ‌long time and is expected to continue regardless of the next presidential election.

Related ⁤Stories

Mr. Ditch ⁣and‌ other researchers have analyzed federal grant ‍records, revealing a‍ pattern of LGBT activists embedded within federal agencies. These‌ activists have the power to decide which projects receive‍ funding and ‍which organizations, both ⁤in the United States and abroad, receive taxpayer money to advance ‍their agendas.

Examples of grants awarded ⁢in recent years include⁣ $65,000‌ for a “Queer Arts Festival”‌ in San Francisco,⁤ $2,315 to support “professional transgender‌ women makeup entrepreneurs” in Nepal, and​ $350,000 to translate an LGBT sex manual into Spanish at the ‍University of Washington.

From ‍Oct. 1, 2020, through Sept. 30, 2023, the federal ⁤government allocated ⁣over $4.1 billion in grants ⁣related to⁤ “LGBT” ⁤or “transgender” initiatives, ⁢as revealed by an investigation by The Epoch Times.‌ This ‌funding ⁤surge has occurred under President Joe‌ Biden, who has⁣ allowed LGBT⁤ activist groups to gain ‍even ‍more influence⁤ within the federal‍ bureaucracy.

“A lot of [former President Barack Obama’s] ‌ staffers felt that they needed to restrain some of their most extreme impulses,” explains Mr. Ditch. However, the Biden administration has shown no ​such restraint,​ leading to a further expansion of ⁤left-wing activism within the federal government.

David Ditch, senior budget⁤ policy analyst for The Heritage Foundation. ⁤(Courtesy of The Heritage Foundation)

Decision-makers in the Biden ‍administration are eager to provide grants to ideological activist organizations, says Mr. Ditch. ⁢As long as these⁢ organizations have access to substantial financial resources from American taxpayers, they will continue⁤ to promote their agenda.

Even during ‍the administration of former ​President Donald Trump, grants were‍ awarded to left-wing causes, highlighting the ⁤continuous stream⁣ of funding for political activism. This‍ taxpayer-funded support strengthens the​ political ⁣Left and its influence.

Grants specifically targeting transgender-related causes have seen exponential growth⁣ in recent years, according to federal records. From⁤ 2008 to 2020, ‌$184 million was allocated to projects involving transgender issues. However, from ‌2021 to Sep. 12, 2023, a staggering $1.2 billion was distributed⁤ for projects‌ related‌ to⁣ transgenderism, with at least $104 million directly supporting transgender initiatives.

Children⁤ cheer⁣ as drag performers dance at the Chattanooga Pride parade in Chattanooga, Tenn., on Oct. ​2, ​2022. (Jackson Elliott/The Epoch Times)

Left-wing ideological ​capture⁤ extends across almost every⁢ federal department, including USAID, NEH, DOE, HHS, DOS,​ and DOD, as revealed by a federal spending database.

The Biden administration’s requirement⁢ for⁤ DEI statements (Diversity,​ Equity, ‌and Inclusion) in grant applications⁣ further ⁣complicates tracking⁢ the exact⁤ amount of federal⁤ funding allocated ​to LGBT activism. However, researchers have meticulously‌ analyzed these ⁣statements to uncover the increasing expenditure on transgender​ medical research, ‍LGBT arts festivals, ⁤and activism.

The U.S. ‌Capitol building ⁢in ⁣Washington‍ on Sept.‍ 30, 2023. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

Grant opportunities are created by left-leaning governments,‌ and federal employees ⁤play a significant⁣ role in determining which organizations receive funding. The ​power wielded by these ‌employees is immense, and shifting control towards political ‍neutrality is ​a complex ‍task.

“The⁣ solution is not ⁢trying‍ to nudge the federal Leviathan a‌ tenth of a⁢ degree toward the right,” asserts Mr. Ditch. Instead,⁤ he⁤ suggests reducing the amount of money given to federal employees to distribute, thereby limiting their ⁣influence.

What measures can be taken to ensure a fair⁤ and unbiased⁣ process for awarding grants related to LGBT causes,​ in order to address concerns about transparency and accountability in the‍ federal grant system

​Ed for⁣ the same purpose, as reported by The Epoch Times.

This significant increase in⁢ funding for⁣ LGBT causes ⁢has ‌raised⁤ concerns ⁤among conservatives and ⁣those who​ believe⁢ that taxpayer money should not ⁤be used to advance a particular political or⁣ social agenda. ⁢Critics argue that these grants ‍are not based on merit or the needs of‍ the American people but rather on the ideological beliefs‌ of those ⁤in power.

“It’s fundamentally about who you know,‌ ​who you’re connected to, and what ideology you hold,” says⁣ ⁢Mr. Ditch.⁤ “There’s⁢ no competitive process where you get​ the best projects⁤ with the ⁢most innovation,‌ the most benefit for the taxpayer. It’s simply who has the best connections with the people who ​are doling out‍ the ⁤money.”

Furthermore, the‍ allocation of taxpayer funds to controversial and potentially objectionable​ projects raises concerns about the lack of transparency and accountability in ⁢the ​federal grant system. Taxpayers have a​ right to know how their money is being ⁤spent and whether it aligns ‌with their values and priorities.

While there is undoubtedly⁢ a need for government support and resources to address important issues affecting marginalized communities, there should be a fair and unbiased process in place for ​awarding grants. This process should prioritize the⁢ needs of⁣ the American people and ensure that⁢ taxpayer money is being used ⁢effectively and responsibly.

As the debate continues surrounding the federal government’s funding of LGBT causes, it is crucial to examine and evaluate the‌ underlying factors that ​contribute⁤ to this situation. Transparency, accountability, and a fair allocation process are key principles that‍ should be upheld‍ to ensure that ​taxpayer money is being used in the best interest of ⁣all Americans.

Efforts should be made to⁣ depoliticize the​ grant-giving process and reduce the​ influence‍ of‍ ideological activism within federal agencies. This can be‌ achieved through reforms that⁢ promote diversity of thought and‍ perspectives among decision-makers ‍and​ establish ⁢clear criteria‌ for grant selection⁣ based on merit and⁣ the public‍ interest.

Ultimately, the ⁤federal government’s funding of LGBT causes should be a reflection of the diverse needs ‌and​ concerns of the American people, rather than the outcome of‌ ideological dominance within the⁤ bureaucracy. A balanced and fair approach to grant allocation is ⁣necessary to ensure that taxpayer⁤ money‌ is used ​responsibly and effectively for the ‍betterment of‌ society as​ a whole.

By promoting⁢ transparency, ⁤accountability, and‌ a depoliticized grant ​process, the ⁢federal government can regain the trust⁤ of the American people⁤ and demonstrate its commitment to serving the public interest.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker