Politicized Vatican Nativity Scene Sparks Backlash Against Pope Francis: ‘There Are No Words’

The article discusses Pope⁤ Francis’s recent actions that some ‍view as ⁢politicizing the Roman‍ Catholic Church, particularly‍ during the Christmas season.It highlights the inauguration of a nativity scene in the Vatican, where the baby Jesus is depicted lying‍ on a keffiyeh—an emblem ‍associated with Palestinian resistance to Israel.This feat has angered many,as it contrasts sharply ​with the traditional image of Jesus as ⁢a‍ Jewish figure,and is ‌seen as endorsing a ‍specific political narrative,especially amid ongoing ⁤conflicts involving⁤ Israel and⁤ palestine.

Critics argue that Pope Francis is using the sacred festivity of Christmas to make political statements. They ⁤also express⁣ that his ⁤call for peace and remembrance of those suffering ‌from war in Bethlehem reflects a bias that fails to adequately ⁤address the complexities⁣ of the‌ situation, including the ​actions of Hamas.

The backlash is compounded by commentary on​ the Pope’s past statements ‍and actions regarding Israel and⁣ terrorism, ⁢leading ⁢many Catholics and Christians to feel that he is misappropriating religious symbolism for political ends.​ The episode raises broader questions about the role of‌ the Church⁤ in contemporary geopolitical issues and the appropriateness of using nativity scenes—central‍ to Christian‌ faith—to ‍make ‍ideological statements. Many believe that such actions detract from ‌the essential message of peace⁢ during⁤ Christmas, leading to widespread condemnation among believers.


If Pope Francis hasn’t given you enough reasons to believe that the Roman Catholic Church, under his guidance, has become a deeply politicized institution, he’s certainly trying to pile on a few more this Christmas.

Yes, the birth of Jesus Christ, Lord and Savior, should be one of those things that only gets insanely political in one of those Unitarian Universalist congregations where the officiants declare that He may have been an enby, or something — not in an institution that derives at least some of its authority from the fact it traces its lineage back to St. Peter, the first pontiff and the rock that Christ built his earthly church upon.

This requires, of course, a certain level of decorum and tradition — even if you’re the artist formerly known as Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who, as Pope Francis, has decided that Roman Catholicism should concern itself more with modern geopolitical controversies.

So naturally, we have the current pontiff attending the inauguration of a nativity scene in the Vatican presented by Palestinian officials in which the baby Jesus was lying on a keffiyeh, the scarf that’s become the universal symbol of Palestinian resistance to Israel.

Bethlehem, where the Savior was born, is now under the control of the Palestinian Authority.

Yes, that’s right: Why not swaddle a Jewish Messiah who was killed to atone for man’s sins in the symbol of a movement that killed 1,200 innocent Jews on Oct. 7 alone?

Just in case you didn’t get the message via the scarf, Pope Francis made sure you did via his words.

According to The Times of Israel, the wheelchair-bound pope used his remarks at the event to exhort believers to “remember the brothers and sisters, who, right there [in Bethlehem] and in other parts of the world, are suffering from the tragedy of war.”

“Enough war, enough violence!” he exclaimed, also condemning the commercial trade of arms. This presumably included the arms the Jewish state is using to protect itself from the terrorists who invaded their country last year and are now playing the victims.

“The keffiyeh-draped cradle, which will be displayed in the Paul VI Hall, is one of a series of nativity scenes collectively titled ‘Nativity of Bethlehem 2024,’ designed by artists Johny Andonia and Faten Nastas Mitwasi, both Palestinians from Bethlehem, according to Vatican News,” the Times of Israel reported, noting it wasn’t “the main nativity scene displayed in St. Peter’s Square.”

Yes, one would hope not. It’s still ugly enough, particularly given that last month, Pope Francis called for an investigation to see whether Israel’s war against Hamas “fits into the technical definition” of genocide.

His attitude toward the terrorist organization, however, has been considerably more, um, lenient.

“The pope has met frequently with family members of those taken hostage, and has repeatedly called for their release,” the Times of Israel noted. “A letter he wrote to Middle Eastern Catholics on the first anniversary of the attack, however, never mentioned Hamas by name, or made explicit reference to its atrocities, including the hostages. The letter also quoted passages from the Gospel of John that have historically been used to fuel religious anti-Semitism.”

One might think that these are things that the man who sits, at least metaphorically, upon the Chair of Saint Peter might want to comment on. Apparently not, and now we have a display with the baby Jesus upon a keffiyeh in the Vatican. You do the math.

In 1961, Pope John XXIII published an encyclical titled “Mater et Magistra,” which translates to “Mother and Teacher.” It was a bit more political than that, putting the church squarely on the side of social justice movements sweeping the world at the time. While the phrase wasn’t coined by him, Catholic William F. Buckley’s National Review famously popularized a bon mot in response to the document: “Mater, si; magistra, no.” In other words, the Church may indeed be mother, but it sometimes fails as a teacher and can be tuned out, in a way.

I’m a former Catholic turned Protestant, so I don’t really have a dog in this fight, so to speak. However, this goes a bit beyond the kind of thing a Catholic can just tune out, safe in the knowledge that 2,000 years of church history can properly cover over a pope unwilling to condemn Hamas but who believes Israel should be investigated for genocide and then attends an event celebrating a nativity scene in which baby Jesus lays upon a keffiyeh.

Others, Catholic and not, found the act similarly shameful:

One of the commenters put it perfectly: “Jesus wanted to bring the world together, not further drive it apart. This is where the term ‘sacrilege’ comes from: the act of treating something sacred with disrespect or violation. This from the Pope?”

Yes, it is. And all Christians — Catholic, Protestant and Orthodox alike — should condemn it loudly and not stop until the pope officially condemns what this abhorrent “nativity scene” stands for. “There are no words to describe how much of an unholy desecration this is,” indeed.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker