Polling Guru Nate Silver Says Trump 10-Point Advantage, Other Pollsters Cheating Like Crazy

The text discusses a political analysis by Nate Silver regarding the upcoming electoral race, ⁤particularly focusing on the chances of Republican candidate Donald Trump compared to Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. Silver⁤ estimates that Trump has a 10% higher likelihood of winning the Electoral College, suggesting a slight lead ⁤for Trump in the current polling data, with a rough estimation of a‌ 55-45 split⁣ in Trump’s favor. He expresses skepticism about the reliability of last-minute polls, claiming that many pollsters manipulate their results to appear in line with their⁤ expectations, a practice known as “herding.”

Silver emphasizes that despite the ‍seeming edge⁢ for Trump, the overall race remains‌ very close, positing it as‍ a ‍nearly 50-50 contest. He offers‌ detailed predictions⁣ for various swing states, noting that while Trump may have a​ stronger lead in ​states like Arizona and Georgia, the overall dynamics suggest a tied race in most places. He mentions the importance of voters participating in the election and reflects on the evolving ⁢political landscape over time. This election, unlike previous ones, has a very⁣ tight competition according to his modeling, contrasting with ⁣forecasts from prior years that⁢ significantly favored one candidate⁤ over another.


Polling data expert Nate Silver predicted that Republican Donald Trump has a 10 percent greater chance than Democrat Kamala Harris of winning the Electoral College vote in Tuesday’s election.

On his “Risky Business” podcast with co-host Maria Konnikova posted Wednesday, he revealed that he does not put too much weight in polls coming out during the last week of the campaign, alleging many pollsters cheat to obtain their desired numbers.

He prefaced his overall forecast saying, “It’s still approximately a 50-50 race.”

“It’s basically 55-45 Trump or 54-45, with a small chance of a tie,” Silver explained with regards to the Electoral College vote. 

“It’s been a little weird. I mean look, it’s gradually drifted to Trump over a fairly long period now. Two out of every three days Harris has lost ground in the forecast since roughly early October,” he said.

WARNING: The following video contains vulgar language that may offend some readers. 

In his online forecast update published on Friday, Silver wrote that the race had tightened in his model, slightly.

“Good update for Harris with some strong polling for her in the Blue Wall states. Not much sign of a last-minute swing in the race,” he wrote, predicting Trump has a 53.8 percent chance of winning the Electoral College to Harris’ 45.8 percent, according to his modeling.

During his podcast, Silver said, “I don’t think we’re going to learn very much in this last week of the polling. In fact, I kind of trust pollsters less.”

“They all, every time a pollster [says], ‘Oh, every state is just +1, every single state’s a tie,’ No! You’re f***ing herding! You’re cheating,” he argued. 

Herding involves polling firms adjusting their results to other pollsters’ findings so as to not be too much of an outlier, according to the American Association for Public Opinion Research.

The danger is that all the firms then end up collectively biasing their results in a way that does not match reality among the voting public.

“Your numbers aren’t all going to come out at exactly 1-point leads when you’re sampling 800 people over dozens of surveys. You are lying! You’re putting your f***ing finger on the scale!” Silver asserted. “I will not name names, but some pollsters are really bad about this.”

“If a pollster never publishes any numbers that surprise you, then it has no value,” Silver contended. 

With that preface, he noted that the presidential candidates appear to be within one percentage point or less of each other in the swing states, with Arizona being an outlier, where Trump has taken an over 2-point lead.

Trump also appears to have a similarly stronger lead in Georgia, where the Real Clear Polling average has him up 2.6 percent.

Overall Silver reiterated that the race is essentially a tie and encouraged everyone to get out and vote.

In 2020, Silver’s model strongly favored Joe Biden to defeat Trump giving the Democrat an 89 percent chance.

However, in 2016 he also predicted Hillary Clinton would beat Trump, giving her a 71.4 percent chance to his 28.6 percent.

Silver did not think the Republican would likely win the Blue Wall states of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, nor North Carolina or Florida.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker