TikTok ban advances in Congress despite GOP opposition

A Controversial Bill to Ban TikTok in the U.S. ⁤Advances‍ to the House Floor

A highly ‍debated bill that could potentially prohibit the Chinese-owned social‌ media giant TikTok from ​being downloaded in the United ‌States is making its ‌way to the House floor.⁣ The legislation, known as the ‘‘Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” was unanimously approved by the House Energy and ‌Commerce Committee in a bipartisan ​vote of 50-0.

Introduced by Rep. Mike ⁤Gallagher (R-WI), the⁢ bill requires TikTok’s parent company, ByteDance, to divest the app or face a complete ban in the U.S. It also​ establishes a ⁣process for ​the executive branch to ban apps in the future if‍ they pose a “national security” risk.

Rep. Gallagher, who chairs ⁣the House​ Select Committee on ‍the Strategic Competition ⁣Between the United States‍ and the ​Chinese Communist Party, delivered a strong message to TikTok, stating, “Break up with​ the Chinese Communist Party or‌ lose access to your⁢ American users. America’s foremost adversary should not control a dominant media platform in our country. TikTok’s time in the United States is‍ over unless it ends its relationship with CCP-controlled ByteDance.”

What the Bill ⁣Considers “Controlled by a Foreign Adversary”

(A) ⁤a foreign person that is domiciled in, is headquartered in,‌ has its principal ‍place of business in, or is organized under the laws of a foreign​ adversary country; (B)‌ an entity with respect to ‍which a foreign person or combination of foreign‍ persons described in subparagraph (A) ‌directly or ‌indirectly own at least a 20 percent stake; or (C) a⁢ person subject ‍to ⁢the direction or ​control of a foreign person or ⁣entity described in subparagraph (A) or (B).

While the bill⁣ has garnered support ‍from ​several GOP congressmen, including House Speaker Mike‍ Johnson (R-LA), some Republican lawmakers and former President Donald Trump have expressed their opposition to a ⁤complete ban on ⁤TikTok.

Trump, who ⁢previously advocated for a ‍TikTok ban⁢ while in office, recently posted ⁢on Truth Social, “If you‍ get rid of TikTok, ​Facebook ⁢and Zuckerschmuck will double their business. I don’t want Facebook, who cheated in the last Election, doing‍ better. ‌They are a true Enemy ⁢of⁢ the People!”

Interestingly, ‍Trump’s stance on TikTok has shifted since leaving ⁢the White House. In 2020, he issued an executive order calling for ByteDance‌ to ⁣divest⁤ from TikTok, but the order was later blocked ⁣by federal judges.

Elon Musk, the owner of X, also chimed in on the proposed TikTok ban, aligning with Trump’s viewpoint.

TikTok responded to‌ the bill’s‍ advancement, ⁣claiming that it is an ⁤outright ban that infringes on the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans and harms‌ small businesses. ⁢The app urged its users to contact their congressmen and ⁤voice‍ their opposition⁣ to the legislation.

Despite the controversy, the White ⁤House ⁤has signaled its support for‌ a⁤ potential TikTok ban,‌ even as President Joe⁣ Biden’s re-election campaign utilizes the app to reach ⁢potential voters.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP

What are the ​criteria for considering an app “controlled by a foreign adversary” according to the bill?

‌ Ockquote> According to the bill, ⁣an ‌app is considered “controlled by ⁤a ‌foreign adversary” if​ it meets the following criteria:

  1. The app⁤ is owned or controlled by a ‍foreign entity ⁢that⁤ is subject to the control of a foreign ​adversary.
  2. The app ‌has access to personal data ‌of users located in the United States, or has the ⁤ability to conduct surveillance on⁣ users‍ located in the United ‌States.
  3. The​ app poses a threat ⁢to the national‍ security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States.

TikTok, with its 800 ​million⁤ active users worldwide, has come under scrutiny due​ to concerns about ⁤its data collection practices and its ties⁣ to the Chinese ‌government. Critics argue that the app collects a vast amount of personal data from users, including location information, device ⁢information,⁢ and ⁢browsing history, which may be shared with the Chinese government. These concerns have led ⁢to calls for bans⁢ or other restrictions on the app in multiple countries, including the United States.

Supporters ‌of the bill argue that banning TikTok ‍is necessary to protect⁢ national security. They ‍claim that the Chinese government could use the ⁣app to collect‌ sensitive information on US citizens, including government officials ⁢and ​military personnel, for​ intelligence purposes. They also⁤ express concerns about the app’s potential ⁤for spreading⁤ misinformation and propaganda.

However, opponents of the bill argue that banning TikTok⁢ would‌ infringe on ‍free⁣ speech rights and set a dangerous precedent for government regulation⁤ of social media platforms. They believe that there are already existing‍ mechanisms​ in place, such as the⁢ Committee on Foreign Investment in ⁢the ⁣United States (CFIUS),‍ to review and address any potential national ​security concerns related to foreign ‍ownership of ⁢companies.

The Impact on Users and‌ Businesses

If ‌the bill ‌becomes ‌law and ‌TikTok is banned ⁣in the United States, it⁣ would ​have a significant impact ‍on the app’s ​users and the businesses ⁣that rely on the platform for marketing and⁤ advertising.‌ TikTok has become⁤ immensely popular, particularly among younger users, and has emerged as⁣ a platform for content creators, ‌influencers, and businesses to reach a wide ⁢audience.

Banning TikTok‍ would also​ have economic consequences, as ByteDance, the company behind TikTok, is estimated to be worth over $100 billion.​ The app’s ban would likely lead ​to job losses and financial losses⁢ for‌ the company ‍and its employees.

The Future of the Bill

The bill will⁣ now move to the House ⁤floor⁣ for further debate⁣ and a vote.​ If it passes the House, it⁤ will then need to be ​approved in the Senate before ⁤it‌ can become law. However, it remains to be seen whether the bill will gain enough support to pass both chambers of‍ Congress.

Even if the bill ​becomes law, it is uncertain whether a ⁢complete ban on TikTok is the most‌ effective solution to address national ‌security⁤ concerns. Some argue that a‌ more nuanced approach, such as increased oversight or restrictions on data collection, ⁢may be a​ more balanced and effective approach.

As the ⁣debate continues, one thing is clear – the fate of​ TikTok in the United States hangs in the balance. The potential ban‌ raises questions⁣ about the regulation of social media platforms, national security concerns, and the​ impacts on users⁤ and businesses.⁢ Only time will‍ tell what the outcome will be.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker