Priceless: Dem Rep Squirms, Sweats as He’s Forced to Watch His Own Past Comments About Hunter Pardon

In a recent interview on⁣ CNN,‍ Representative‍ Dan Goldman faced significant scrutiny from host Brianna keilar regarding his previous assertions that President Joe Biden would​ never​ pardon his son, Hunter ⁤Biden. During ⁤the ⁤interview, Keilar played a clip of ​Goldman confidently making this claim ‌during a⁣ july⁣ 2023 discussion, ‍prompting⁢ direct questions about⁤ how‌ he felt watching his earlier remarks in light of the ⁤current situation.

Goldman ⁣attempted to defend himself by arguing that the ⁢necessity for a pardon arose from the‌ collapse of Hunter’s plea deal, which ‍he suggested was the result of “Republican congressional intervention.” though, Keilar countered that​ Goldman’s original statement about the pardon came after that plea deal had already fallen apart. The exchange was‍ characterized ‍by Goldman appearing visibly uncomfortable as⁢ he struggled to provide satisfactory answers, with many observers noting his evasions‌ and‍ contradictions.

Critics pointed out that instead of Congressional meddling,⁢ it was judicial scrutiny that ultimately ⁤derailed Hunter‍ Biden’s plea agreement.​ The⁢ segment ‍highlighted the challenges Democrats face in defending ‌Biden⁢ amid ongoing controversies, illustrating the pressure placed on ⁢party representatives to justify their ​positions as public opinion shifts. Social media ‌reactions to the confrontation further exacerbated ⁣the narrative of Goldman being caught⁢ in a lie,⁤ reflecting a broader disdain for perceived dishonesty by political representatives.

This instance serves as a reminder of‍ the precarious position of political ⁢defenders, especially when past statements ​clash with current realities, echoing the ‌sentiment that even in pleasant media environments, political accountability ‌can‍ become a daunting task.


For a Democratic defender of President Joe Biden, a CNN interview should be Easy Street.

But things were different for New York Rep. Dan Goldman on Monday, when the network’s normally sympathetic Brianna Keilar brought Goldman’s own past comments about President Joe Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter, back to haunt him.

As the squirming Goldman showed, defending the indefensible makes even liberal Democrats sweat.

Check it out here:

As the transcript for Monday’s “CNN News Central” showed, Keiler framed her question around a July 2023 interview to ask how Goldman felt “watching yourself back then reassuring people that Biden was not going to issue a pardon for his son?”

When Goldman tried to respond that it was the collapse of Hunter Biden’s federal court plea deal that made the pardon necessary, Keiler reminded him that the comment in his interview came after that plea deal had imploded.

In short, it was a lie, and Goldman — after a deer-in-the-headlights look that was almost laughable — came back with another lie.

In a longer clip of the video on RealClearPolitics, Goldman’s panic was palpable as he piled on another lie, then another.

“After the plea fell through and it became clear about why it did, including Republican congresssional intervention in this case, which made this case very unique and very different from any other case, I think that we all, perhaps I should have as well, recognized that this is not the normal prosecution …,” he said.

“If Hunter Biden were not Hunter Biden, he would never be charged with these crimes.”

As Goldman has to know, it wasn’t “Republican congressional intervention” that spiked Hunter’s plea deal, it was a judge’s close questioning of the agreement’s provisions that actually ended up with the deal scuttled.

And it was not Hunter’s last name that singled him out for prosecution, it was his last name that protected him from prosecution — or even investigation — for the many years he acted as his father’s bag man in an international influence-peddling scheme that benefited the entire Biden family.

It was his last name that got him the sweetheart plea deal in the first place.

And social media users were watching:

Aside from the amusement value of watching Goldman squirm in the normally friendly confines of a CNN interview, the interview is instructive in that it shows how weak and dishonest the president has made his defenders appear.

Defending the indefensible is no walk on Easy Street, not even for a Democrat on CNN.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Sponsored Content
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker