Ryan Khojasteh: A Progressive Prosecutor Ready to Bring Real Safety to San Francisco
San Francisco district attorney candidate Ryan Khojasteh (LinkedIn)
A former prosecutor for San Francisco’s recalled district attorney, Chesa Boudin, is stepping up to take on his old boss. Meet Ryan Khojasteh, a 30-year-old progressive who recently entered the race with a promise to deliver “real safety” to a city grappling with crime spikes, homelessness, and drug overdoses.
Khojasteh, a former public defender, stood by Boudin during the recall that removed him from office. Now, he works for Alameda County’s progressive district attorney Pamela Price, who, like Boudin, received support from liberal billionaire George Soros and is facing her own recall campaign.
Running for the top prosecutor’s job in a city known for its progressive politics, Khojasteh will test the Bay Area’s appetite for electing a left-wing district attorney once again. With concerns about open-air drug use, fentanyl dealing, and overall safety on the rise among San Franciscans, Khojasteh’s campaign website highlights the city’s crime problems and challenges the idea of arresting drug users.
While Khojasteh has yet to unveil a detailed platform, he has expressed support for unionizing prosecutors, expanding assistance for victims, and seeking longer jail sentences for criminals who seriously harm their victims. He believes in finding a balance between accountability and rehabilitation for a better approach to public safety.
A Moderate Opponent and a Track Record of Progress
Khojasteh’s opponent, Brooke Jenkins, is a moderate Democrat who has taken a more aggressive stance on prosecution and achieved a higher conviction rate than her predecessors. However, crime rates have not significantly decreased under her leadership. Jenkins fired Khojasteh after replacing Boudin.
For the past year, Khojasteh has been working for Oakland D.A. Pamela Price, who has faced criticism for the surge in crime and lawlessness in her jurisdiction. In his role, Khojasteh has been involved in referring criminal defendants to rehabilitation programs, handling victim restitution, and prosecuting parole and post-release violations.
Despite positioning himself as a middle ground between Boudin and Jenkins, Khojasteh has long been active in San Francisco’s left-wing circles. In 2018, he even challenged former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi from the left, advocating for a rehabilitative approach to criminal justice that included the decriminalization of drug use.
Khojasteh has also shown support for his current boss, Pamela Price, by making donations to her campaign amid mounting efforts to recall her due to concerns about Oakland’s crime wave.
A Controversial Connection and Opposition
Through his political Facebook page, Khojasteh helped raise funds for the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund, a group with alleged funding ties to Hamas according to NGO Monitor. While he publicly condemned Hamas after their terrorist attacks on Israel, he also expressed criticism of Israel’s response, raising questions about moral considerations.
San Franciscan Richie Greenberg, who led the successful recall of Boudin, has already launched a “Reject Ryan” website to oppose Khojasteh’s candidacy. Greenberg argues that San Franciscans have had enough of “Restorative Justice prosecutors” who actively work against criminal accountability.
How will the upcoming election for San Francisco district attorney shape the city’s criminal justice system and impact the lives of its residents
Ireless Advocate for Criminal Justice Reform
As Khojasteh prepares to face other candidates in the race for San Francisco district attorney, one notable opponent stands out: Nancy Tung. Tung, a former prosecutor herself, is seen as a more moderate candidate in comparison to Khojasteh. However, she is not without her own progressive ideas for criminal justice reform. Tung has focused on advocating for more community involvement and creating preventive programs to keep at-risk individuals from engaging in criminal activity in the first place.
Both candidates share a common goal of addressing the root causes of crime rather than solely focusing on incarceration. However, they differ in their approaches. Khojasteh emphasizes his experience as a public defender, arguing that it gives him a unique perspective into the flaws and failures of the system. He believes in diverting non-violent offenders away from jails and towards community-based alternatives that promote education, job training, and mental health support.
In contrast, Tung highlights her experience as a prosecutor and asserts that she has a deep understanding of the challenges faced by law enforcement in tackling crime effectively. She aims to implement stricter sentencing for repeat offenders and expand the use of specialized courts to address underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior, such as drug addiction and mental health problems.
The Role of a Progressive Prosecutor
Progressive prosecutors like Khojasteh argue that traditional methods of law enforcement have disproportionately affected marginalized communities and perpetuated a cycle of incarceration without addressing the underlying issues that lead to crime. They believe in transforming the criminal justice system to prioritize rehabilitation, restorative justice, and community-based solutions.
However, critics argue that a focus on progressive policies may come at the expense of public safety. They fear that a shift away from traditional forms of punishment and an emphasis on rehabilitation and diversion programs will lead to a rise in crime rates. These concerns have been amplified in San Francisco, where the city has witnessed an increase in property crimes, drug-related offenses, and acts of violence in recent years.
A Crucial Decision for San Francisco
The upcoming election for San Francisco district attorney is undoubtedly a crucial one. With crime rates on the rise and public safety concerns at the forefront, the choice between candidates like Khojasteh and Tung will not only determine the direction of the city’s criminal justice system but also shape the lives of its residents.
As voters assess the candidates’ platforms and consider the pros and cons of different approaches to public safety, weighing the need for accountability and punishment against the potential for rehabilitation and societal healing will be of utmost importance. Ultimately, the decision will lie in the hands of San Francisco’s residents, who will determine the path towards a safer and more just city.
Now loading...